• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Bet selections for columns made very simple

Started by Tamino, Jan 18, 11:15 AM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

blueman

Quote from: Tamino on Jan 22, 06:10 PM 2016


The First  and secind column combined   give you 14 BLACK, while Column  1 and 3 give combined  14  Reds. Do not bet any of those color separate.  That`  not needed. You got already 14 of one color  and 10 of the other as  a hedge.

Very interesting and easy to play, I have to try. I believe in your knowledge :thumbsup:

RouletteGhost

See attached photo

most here play european so this is a euro test for Taminos recommendation of:

if last decision was black bet columns 1 and 2, if last decision was red bet columns 1 and 3

the results

wins- 115
losses- 63

I did not bet 0, and when 0 came i waited for new trigger after before betting again

result flat betting 185 spins- minus 11 units. would i sit for 185 spins? no

the good news - max loss in a row was 3. Therefore if I personally was playing hit and run I WOULD use a negative progression HIT AND RUN for 2 to 3 units and move on. NOT SAYING for any of you to do that...but on american and euro wheel max loss I typically see with this consecutively is 3 in a row, and it is seldom, not very often do I see 3 in a row loss with this. So I would wait for one virtual loss and then bet with a progression for a few units then stop, no long term play
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

blueman

I like this system. Can I play with positive Charles Guetting progression?

celescliff

Made an earlier test on this for 100 spins.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: celescliff on Jan 28, 12:18 PM 2016
Made an earlier test on this for 100 spins.

Every spin?
Progression?
Thanks
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

celescliff

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 28, 12:33 PM 2016
Every spin?
Progression?
Thanks

Yes, I played every spin with 1, 2, 4 progression (IIRC) on this. Except when 0, I waited one spin before continue.

RouletteGhost

1 2 4 every single spin or just up on a loss?

Thanks!
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

celescliff

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 28, 12:44 PM 2016
1 2 4 every signle spin or up on a loss?

Up on a loss. 1 unit as base.  :thumbsup:

thelaw

Quote from: celescliff on Jan 28, 12:18 PM 2016
Made an earlier test on this for 100 spins.

This is the usual pattern that Ignatus sees with his charts as well. First few look good, then it tanks......

Usually takes about 10 of them to see a failure on average.

Great work-much appreciated! :thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

Tamino

thelaw,


Don`t act so uppity.  As  any  experienced player  knows full well  that when EC  are involved  the principle of diminishing  probability becomes apparent..


You must be an amateur by making statements  like the one above  The idea  for  this bet selection was offered by  an experienced roulette player.











































































































































































thelaw

Quote from: Tamino on Jan 28, 04:03 PM 2016
thelaw,


Don`t act so uppity.  As  any  experienced player  knows full well  that when EC  are involved  the principle of diminishing  probability becomes apparent..


You must be an amateur by making statements  like the one above  The idea  for  this bet selection was offered by  an experienced roulette player.

First off Tamino............I understand that you apparently want to start something with me..........I appreciate the initiative, but find someone else to bother..........i'm busy.

Second, I understand that you might be sensitive about the possibility that your posted method might fail............don't worry........it happens to everyone. God knows I've posted my share of failed methods.

Third, take a moment and look at the end of my response.............which ends on a positive note of "great work-much appreciated". I was simply making a point about single positive charts, which we've seen many times, not trying to diminish Celescliff's hard work, which I appreciate.

Next time, take a moment to read the entire response before posting accusations. :thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

Tamino

  BASTA.




No more comments with that amateu.

thelaw

You sir.......are a monster!!!

RouletteGhost

what id like to do is refine this

Id like to heard a good money management for this

if black bet 1 and 2, if red bet 1 and 3

any ideas?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Tamino

The answer might be found in the chapter " breaking the bank at  flat stakes" page 110

link:://:.archive.org/stream/montecarloanecdo00bethiala



This  might coincide with the recommendation  for the  column method  of flat betting..



For recreational purposes only.
PLAY AT YOUR OWN RISK.

-