• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The SLAP strategy

Started by atlantis, Dec 30, 02:52 PM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

atlantis

Here I reiterate the GLAT system so you can apply to the SLAP 2 if you like this safer type of progression:

Quote

The ORIGINAL GLAT system single doz
========================
Each line I will call a set of W/L's.


1.  W   Ends set.  If at a new profit, reset to 1 unit else stay at same bet size and start a new set.


2. LW   Ends Set.  If at a new profit, reset to 1 unit else stay at same bet size and start a new set.


3. LLW   Ends set.  Neutral set.  No bet size change.  Start a new set.


4.  LLLW  Ends set.  -1  Very small loss, so start a new set at same bet size.


5.  LLLLW  Ends set.  -2  Getting into losses, so play next set at +1 unit added to bet size.


6.  LLLLL...W  The 1st W ends set.  Number of L's = 5 or more.  This will keep bet sizes from escalating when we hit our sleeping dozen.  As soon as we have a Win it ends this set and we increase our bet size by +1 unit for next set.

These 6 sets should cover every possibility.  Sets 1 & 2 are our winning sets.

If you find yourself betting a large bet size and you have a few wins in a row, you might consider decreasing your bet size but not all the way back to 1 rather than staying at the same level just in case you're about to go into another losing series.

Remember, Risk vs Reward.  Decision time.


The ORIGINAL GLAT system single doz (here applied to the lines/DS)
========================

Each line I will call a set of W/L's.

Base unit=0.5u

Start @ 1 x 0.5 unit on each of 2 lines.

1.  W   Ends set.  If at a new profit, reset to 1 x 0.5 unit on each line else stay at same bet size and start a new set.

2. LW   Ends Set.  If at a new profit, reset to 1 x 0.5 unit on each line else stay at same bet size and start a new set.

3. LLW   Ends set.  Neutral set.  No bet size change.  Start a new set.

4. 5. and 6. are as above. (except increase by +0.5 instead of 1 where indicated)

*****The following is only a suggested change to consider****

4b. LLL  Ends set with loss.  Increase bet by 0.5 units on each line.  Wait for a VIRTUAL WIN before starting a new set. (This was GLC idea)

This will eliminate all losses of more than 3 in a row.
It doesn't mean we won't start our next set with 3 more Losses after our Virtual Win.
 

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

atlantis

Hi Normy,

Re: The import button and subsequent file requester dialog.

I cannot seem to locate or load a normal spinfile that is in .txt format on my desktop.
Also if file is located elsewhere I can get to correct folder of a file - but contents of folder not displayed in the import dialog in order to select the wanted file...

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

atlantis

Quote from: atlantis on Jan 08, 10:59 AM 2015
Hi Normy,

Re: The import button and subsequent file requester dialog.

I cannot seem to locate or load a normal spinfile that is in .txt format on my desktop.
Also if file is located elsewhere I can get to correct folder of a file - but contents of folder not displayed in the import dialog in order to select the wanted file...

What am I doing wrong?

Thanks,
A.

Ahh.. I figured it out alternative way - just 'select all' the spins in the text file and copy+paste into the import sheet (after clearing it first) into the first cell. Worked good.
And would have been a nice winning session too! :)
Quite easy really.

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

Rewster88

Still someone playing this? Or is MrJ right in post 31? Lol

GLC

Mr. J's always right, eventually.

A couple might still be testing some of the latest ideas.

Sometimes Atlantis takes a few days to come back.  He's usually testing a new tweak to see if it's worth presenting.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Realplayer26

Quote from: MrJ on Dec 31, 03:43 PM 2014
Funny thing about the boards......lets SAY, this holds up pretty well and we are all patting each other on the back.

In three months, they'll be very few additional posts, nobody talking about it anymore, few people playing it and members sitting around waiting for the next best thing. Not trying to sound like mister negative but I have seen it go down like this hundreds of times in the past.

Ken
Ok are many ideas which are very near to some good soluttion, this idea of Atlantis is very similar to some bias play method, which bias players use 20 if not 50 years :) with quite good success. But main problem in Atlantis method is that he use lyout on the table , which is really not have relationship with game. What is relationship between numbers 1-2-3-4-5-6 ? Any, but he use them as some stable group. The same as others lines on table.

Groups must be created by some principes which are in game, say order in which numbers comes.

Other moment is that analysing of all he do in front. Mus be done oposite - from the end, so have order of numbers and we analyse all numbers as last our winers and look if that winer give us plus or not. And what must be system /rule of betting that most numbers will give us plus.

Now is all without logick , say as in initial variant - to wait 3 hits then try to bet, simple question if to look from the end - why then wait theese 3 hits ? If we want to look how all goes we simply can colect 1000 numbers and analyse them without any bettings, so find teoretical soluttion.

So all we can calculate mathematically, we not need to do any test - have idea write function/program and have soluttion...
Solution are always, you only must find it.

RFMAXX

still testing my tweak. works so far, but sometime it needs long tracking.
my tweak is simple.
i am using the wheel layout. so 32-15-19-4-21-2 is DS 1 and so on.
i stop when a ds hit 4 times in the last 11 spins.
if there is more than 1 ds with 3 hits, i ignore the rest and bet only the
first completed ds. 12341212566 bet: only ds 1.
and i only bet the numbers from the ds, that dont hit. so its a 3 to 4 numbers bet.
three times. then start retracking. progression: 24 steps.

another tweak: bet all ds with 3 hits and only the numbers that dont show.

another tweak: choose the ds like in the first example and then bet the ds plus the ds before and after that. so 1 - 2 - 6 and only the numbers that dont show.

a lot of testing :) will report.

Realplayer26

Quotei am using the wheel layout. so 32-15-19-4-21-2 is DS 1 and so on.

That is slightly better than table layout, but still - why group start at 32, not on 0, or 15, or 26 or 19 ?
Where is logick artificially to make boarders of groups ?

On wheel are numbers - there are  no groups, so are no logick when we operate categories as group.

Quotei stop when a ds hit 4 times in the last 11 spins.
So if some number hit and hit - you simply will stop betting on it and will look how others continuoe wining on it ?
Solution are always, you only must find it.

stuggie

I like this strategy and think it may have some merit. I have attached 2000000 results i downloaded from some german casino which iv been using(pen and paper style) to test strategies. they may be of use to someone who is capable of testing properly

Stuggie

nottophammer

Quote from: agesta on Dec 31, 12:58 AM 2014
Hi!
I have tested this system in 23 sessions.
Result:
I had to restart the tracking 12 times
I  played with bets 11 sessions
I won all 11!!!
It returned 28 units!
It usually got a hit on the first or second spin one time on the last spin.
Very very nice so far!!!

Cheers Agesta

still using this Agesta
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

agesta

Hi!
I am still playing this with alright results,and  i am trying to connect this system with the system Dane´s JAW OF THE THIRDS
to make it strong together.

agesta

atlantis

Hi,

Due to busy time - haven't tested much but I can tell you that I'm no longer using the tracker; have gone back to the original SLAP system + 11 result string rules. That is to say betting the lines that hit only 3 times over 11 spins. Basically it's the methodology of the first 6 pages of this topic - and I like using the GLC idea of separate progressions for the lines.
I will see if anything can be developed from this...

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

nottophammer

thanks for reply Agesta
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

SamNL

It's been some time I've responded on this forum.

But I have to say that I've been following this thread with great interest.

At the moment I'm playing it the original way that's described on the first page just like Atlantis is doing it.
I'm playing it on a rolling basis. So every time I win I delete all the spins until I have 3 repeats of the DS that won. Same goes for 4 hits on a DS before 11 spins. Deleting all prior spins until I have 3 repeats withing 11 spins. Progression that I am using is the idea that GLC came up with. The individual lines progression. For now I'm just trial running this. Just to see how it goes. I'll try to report on my progress.

EDIT:

First test result: +14
Start
795
End
809

Just fun chips for now.

SamNL

Begin
809
End
826

+17 units

Total: +31 units

I reset the progression on every line when I break even or get a +1.

-