Turbo Denzie or is it Denzie Turbo

[maestro]

@cht...what happen with fractals are you going to explain more about it or that was it...<not that i understood previous ones>

[RouletteGhost]

I don't think anyone should discuss mr j. He uses a terrible no good forum as a platform to only bash others

It's sad

Let him be

[Steve]

Yes its a waste of time. You could not mention him for a year and he'd still be there attacking you.  Cant say Im not glad to watch gf crash. Mike dug his own hole.

Turbo, come back to the light. You will still have fair criticism, but at least you wont have to deal with trolls.

[DoctorSudoku]

But there's hardly any common numbers between columns and all the main groups running perpendicular, hence less dependency.

Gilius-Falkor,
That is why I made my original columns comment specifically in regard to the US double zero wheel.

Many people who are knowledgeable about the distribution of numbers on the double zero wheel will know what I am alluding to.

[cht]

@cht...what happen with fractals are you going to explain more about it or that was it...<not that i understood previous ones>

About fractals, lets take red/black and the outcomes are plotted as a line graph, red=+1, black=-1

Assume for some reason you know the larger fractal points up(net red), then there's the smaller fractal that forms which points down(net black).

Since you know about this larger net red fractal, then it makes sense to start betting red at the apex of this smaller net black fractal with the expectation that the larger net red fractal will form eventually.

Hope this short explanation helps.

[maestro]

Hope this short explanation helps

no..

when say <assume> and< for some reason> does not help...+1,-1 is just red hit or black what about zero...and how do i know what will hit more

[cht]

no..

when say <assume> and< for some reason> does not help...+1,-1 is just red hit or black what about zero...and how do i know what will hit more

I use 'assume for some reason' because I'm aware you don't know about fractal formations.

Look, I've a long background in fx learnt speculation with that asset that is fractal in nature. All I did was to upload roulette outcomes onto my fx charts which I constructed on excel, bet the way I would as if they were fx trades.

Ofc in the translation from one asset to another there's the challenge to calibrate it to replicate the original fx setup.

Now this fractal explanation above is a short description of how fractal plays the role to determine betselection. Just the concept. The details is immense, yes immense both in technicalities as well as the practical aspect.

Some readers who are familiar with fx and writing codes might pick up useful pointers from what I've posted to try do the same. I know of 1 regular member on here who did . it gives him a new perspective to ponder.

[RouletteGhost]

Yes its a waste of time. You could not mention him for a year and he'd still be there attacking you.  Cant say Im not glad to watch gf crash. Mike dug his own hole.

Turbo, come back to the light. You will still have fair criticism, but at least you wont have to deal with trolls.

To use a forum to bash another isn't worth it

The energy that your body converts from the calories we eat which then causes the fingers to type on the keyboard isn't worth it

Especially for a tool like J

[MoneyT101]

Hedging doesn't work if bets have a negative expectation.

But at least your description of the method was fairly clear, so at least members can test it.

Depends on how you look at it!

i don't know if hedging is the correct word.

Let's say a session is 7 spins.  From 1 to 7 spins I need to make a profit or break even.  If I'm playing for a repeat and the repeat comes most likely I made my money if I was playing splits.  At the same time if I was hedging playing dozens to cover any losses on splits I also make money or break even by the end of the 7 spins.

That's the idea, playing multiple games at the same time.  AT CERTAIN POINTS EACH GAME WINS!  With different payouts and the effect is breaking even or profit!

Some people have figured this out..advanced Method(Dyksexlic, reddwarf/rrbb, Priyanka)and Che which played more of a trigger game and less layers.

[RouletteGhost]

Priyanka admired his teachings were not a holy grail

You people are delusional

[maestro]

I use 'assume for some reason' because I'm aware you don't know about fractal formations

once again<like i did in school> i think i will skip lessons..thanks for your time

[DoctorSudoku]

American wheel or not, columns are another legitimate zoom feature.

And if you care to leave the comfort of the table layout, you could add a plethora of other significant zoom features to you preferred complications.

But the peculiar distribution of the column numbers on the US double zero wheel does justify paying special (i.e. extra or greater) attention to the columns (vis-a-vis, say, a competing zoom feature like the dozens).

[RouletteGhost]

Yes the 00 wheel distribution of the columns allows you to potentially "play the wheel" using columns on American wheels.

[Bayes]

Let's try one more time, but using Dozens instead of Red and Black...
Which Dozen will "repeat" I wonder..?

Spin 1: 3...

I predict 63% chance that it will be Dozen 3 that will repeat next!

Spin 2: 31...

I predict 89% chance that it will be Dozen 3 or Dozen 1 that will repeat next.

Dozen 3 and Dozen 1 both have a single appearance and need only one more appearance to be awarded the repeat (89% chance).
Dozen 2, on the other hand, requires two appearance to overtake Dozens 3 and 1 to get the repeat award instead (only 11% chance).

Any clearer?

falkor, I don't know how you arrived at these probabilities, can you explain?

[falkor2k15]

falkor, I don't know how you arrived at these probabilities, can you explain?

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15938.msg155266#msg155266