The Holy Grail! (For Red/Black)

[Compa]

Ok Compa, we get the picture about you hating RNG but by the posts everyone is having the same results wether they are on live or rng, it's all random mate.

We? Who are We? And NO, its NOT Random. that's why You play the Best System you've ever seen in your Life mate. I know why it works but You don't. RNG is NOT Roulette get that into your Heads.

And where is the Results?? The only Results i have seen is my own Results of 3000 spins.

/Compa

[F_LAT_INO]

What really intrigues me abhout this method is this;

---Will also ask what is so special about -3-6-9-12-15-18-21-24-27-30-33-36
that it should behave different then       -2-5-8-11-14-17-20-23-26-29-32-35--
or for that matter                                    -1-4-7-10-13-16-19-22-25-28-31-34

In my humble opinion there is nothing special,mistery or magics involved.
Am attaching a session where am applaying same Compas method
on the same basis with numbers in column 2----4-reds--8 blacks
and the results are evidently even little better----and if you try it same with the column
1-6-reds--6-blacks---you will get the similar results.
Appreciate Compas idea about this bet which could turn into something very special,
but do not agree that this should work cause some numbers are connected more with
each other then other numbers,as they are all equally connected at the end.

[Compa]

What really intrigues me abhout this method is this;

---Will also ask what is so special about -3-6-9-12-15-18-21-24-27-30-33-36
that it should behave different then       -2-5-8-11-14-17-20-23-26-29-32-35--
or for that matter                                    -1-4-7-10-13-16-19-22-25-28-31-34

In my humble opinion there is nothing special,mistery or magics involved.
Am attaching a session where am applaying same Compas method
on the same basis with numbers in column 2----4-reds--8 blacks
and the results are evidently even little better----and if you try it same with the column
1-6-reds--6-blacks---you will get the similar results.
Appreciate Compas idea about this bet which could turn into something very special,
but do not agree that this should work cause some numbers are connected more with
each other then other numbers,as they are all equally connected at the end.

If You Read the previous Posts You will notice that most of the posters(if not all) are surprised by the consistent Behaviour of this method. Even some old experienced players that goes way back with me. In my Section there is noneed for arguing against or with. Or any competitive attitudes at all. Then you're at the wrong spot.
So,You do what you think is Best.  I am absolutely not interested in your attempt to prove that i am wrong or whatever.

You don't know absolutely nothing about these Numbers or the REASON why I picked them. Or why this is the Best RouletteMethod Ever Posted on the Entire Internet for FREE. And I'm not going to explain it either. So if you have your own method that take the ass off the Casinos, Fine with me.  But if You want to argue. or having a problem with competitive behaviour, Go elsewhere. So I tell you only once. One more irreevant post and you're out Companéro.

/Compa

[Hermes]

superman how could be RNGs random? What is manipulated by software cannot be random only pseudo. WWW.RANDOM.ORG is atmospheric random, almost random! It is the nearest you can come to random. Much better than RX roulette testings! I do lot of tests on ORG but I still feel the difference between live wheel and the second perfect atmospheric random.
Nobody can copy god and never will. The humanity today's love to copy Satan because it is easy, no challenges, just down hill.
Superman you are still not superman, be patient, you have to learn a lot.
I like all Compa's contributions to forum. Sophisticated entries.
Thanks Hermes

[Hermes]

Compa you are wrong about F LAT INO! He didn't offended you, only said his opinion, and all opinions, if not aggressive, should be welcome because are constructive. Competition is healthy because it pushes us to grow further, not retire. The stupid Rockefeller hated competitions and destroyed all. The same do mighty corporations (Microsoft) in present time. Sick ideas are growing faster than cancer.
Hermes

[Hermes]

keel's idea is the last stage of Leveller (1-2-4-8). But I wouldn't go to step4 - to bet 8 units until in win. Too much!
1-2-4 is enough, and than bet the 4 units until total  breakeven or better than before. With patience it will come.
I see greedy is now regular? Ha, ha, ha...   
Hermes

[F_LAT_INO]

Compa you are wrong about F LAT INO! He didn't offended you, only said his opinion, and all opinions, if not aggressive, should be welcome because are constructive. Competition is healthy because it pushes us to grow further, not retire. The regular Rockefeller hated competitions and destroyed all. The same do mighty corporations (Microsoft) in present time. Sick ideas are growing faster than cancer.
Hermes

Thanks Hermes,
Was just going to say something like that,but you said it instead.
When I post a method I usually plead for a further improvement and explain my believes why the method could work.Compa continuously refuses to do so--why should the numbers
from the third column behave better then these in second column,on the same basis.
If I knew that i wouldn't ask,and if you posted method,dear Compa,you are kind of obligated to unswer some questions.Nobody is arguing or being competitive,just politely ask question.

[Compa]

Since I consider Hermes as one of the very relevant Players, and one of the biggest contributors,  and since i am honored of that he pays attention and even post in my section. I am open for your reply Tino. (he save your butt mate;)

However Guys, I am going to do a "Sticky" about this, but let me spell it out right now.

These are the Rules in my Section:

1.Anyone is Free to Post a method that he/she considering good etc.

2.No One is alloved to "Hammer" a Method.(You will be embarked to the Purgatory in 30 secs)

Why? (see 2a)

2a) Because this is a Section where one either catch up with the post, or dont.

3.  It is abolutey alloved to Question a method! But in a competent and in a constructive(!) way
 
4. I Do not want to hear Why is this, why is that , bla bla, in a subjective way. (very often)

5. The issue is to Beat Roulette, so dont expect any mercy considering Questions, Opinions, etc.
though i am all open for your statements,

This My Section. Stay or Leave. Nothing personal whatsoever.

6.The Stay and gain! Maybe one of my Probuddys will post, ie: Lanky (hasnt lost a BR in 5 yrs) or maybe RONJO, the roulette Wizard (Yes its actually true) the greatest--^^

Just keep up the respect, the courtesy and stay out of competitive behaviour with fellowmembers.

7  So together we maybe we can beat Roulette!

Best Regards!

[Iggy]

To those who question Compa's method:

There is an old saying that goes as follows - " Don't look a gift horse in the mouth ".

iggy

[ScoobyDoo]

Dear Friends,

I think we need to get back on topic.

I don't know what your test results have been but mine have shown a propensity for multiple wins in a row. With that in mind, I have used an up-as-you-win method and have had great success with it.

If you're having multiple wins in a row then use the 1-2-4 up-as-you-win progression

Scooby Doo

[Hermes]

You are right iggi, when you get a horse for free bring him to dentist and pay for fixing his teeth, but that's more expensive than buy a new one! Better accept gifts only from within, they are also for free and last for ever.
I am happy that Compa and F LAT INO dug the tomahawk deep into the earth and smoke together hashish peace pipe.
I tested just for curiosity which one of the other 2 ECs are similar to Red an Black and I got this: Black- High - Odd; Red - Low - Even. Try it the same way on the other 2 ECs to see if I hit the target.
Scooby it is too steep, better would be 1-2-3 or 1-1-2-2-3-3.
Hermes

[Compa]

Aha! Nice reflection on the EC;s! Ill check it out;)

Cheers!

[GLC]

Fellow Seekers,

I don't mean to hi-jack Compa's method, so if there's anything improper about this post, Victor, please move it to the appropriate place.

I have been playing with phenominal results the following tweaked Holy Grail for R/B.

Play the bet selection exactly as Compa's original explanation.  I don't know why this works with the 12 #'s he has given us as betting triggers but they do seem to work.  I haven't tested any other #'s.  It could be that any 12 #'s would work just as well.  But for now it's the 3rd column.  My betting sequence is 1-3-7-15.  While waiting for a trigger, I play similar to what Compa recommended, but I bet 3 units on 1-18 EC and 2 units on the 3rd dozen. I never change the bet placement on this 3/2 bet. As all of you know if you land on any number other than 0/00 or 19-24, you win 1 unit.

If you lose the 1-3-7-15 sequence, you increase to 2-6-14-30 until you win your 26 units back.  If you lose a 2-6-14-30 sequence, increase to 4-12-28-60 and play this sequence until you recover any lost units.  If you lose at this level, you can either stay at 4-12-28-60 until you recover lost units or reach a stop loss, say 350 units; or you can even go to 8-16-32-64.  Decide for yourself based on your testing and risk tolerance.

If you lose on the 3/2 unit bet,  go to 6/4 for 3 wins.  This will recover the 5 units lost plus 1.  Drop back to 3/2.  If you lose 6/4 before 3 wins, go to 12/8 until you have recovered all lost units.  If you lose at 12/8 before full recovery, go to 24/16, then 48/32.  If you win 4 or 5 times in a row on any of these levels you will have fully recovered all lost units and be back at your base betting level.

I have a win target of 80 units per session or a loss of 350 units.  You should probably have 2 or 3 back-up banks to play this for real money.  I have already played 5 sessions on Ladbrokes 0/00 play for free game.  I have won all 5 sessions which = +400 units.  Most of them were so easy that it was surprising.  Also, it doesn't take many spins at all because you are betting on every spin.

The interesting thing about combining these two systems is that when you are playing the Holy Grail R/B system you often times hit some of the losing #'s for the 3/2 system.  The two systems meld together quite well, I think.

I have gotten up to betting 48/32 a couple of times, but never lost at that level.  I haven't gone beyond the 2-6-14-30 level on the R/B bets, but I'm sure that'll happen eventually.

Give it a try.  I think that you'll be surprised at how easy it is to play and how profitable it is in a short period of time.  It definitely looks like it will stay well ahead of any losses on a really bad session.

Cheers,

George

P.S.  I always bet the R/B system.  If I'm betting 6/4 on the other system, I continue to bet that with the R/B simultaneously.  If I'm at the 3/2 level when a R/B trigger shows, I quit playing the 3/2 until I have no more bets to place on the R/B system.  If I have the opportunity to bet R and B at the same time, I use differential betting until one of them hits.  This saves units if the 0/00 hits.

[keel44]

To GLC

    I have tried your twists on this system, and I won 100 units.  The only concern is that 2/3 bet.  I had to go up to 32/48.  This dwarfs the measly 1 unit I had on the R/B method.  The R/B grail method is the main bet here, not the 2/3 bet.  We need to be on more equal terms.  The way I understand it, the 2/3 bet is just to pass the time until you get a trigger.

If we want to truly take advantage of the R/B method, we need a more subtle bet to pass the time...........but your idea did indeed work, and worked very well.


KEEL

[warrior]

well it was raining money at my local casino thanks for your methed compa.