37 back to basics

[6th-sense]

Hell even put out your biased wheel numbers in it’ll show you the same results

I think that some of us have more comprehension than you give credit for

[Nimo]

Trolling again ..I pretty much realise that you have your own agenda and it’s you that’s not comprehending

As I say use ayks tracker it’s there for you and anyone to confirm what I’m saying

Just another thread

Just another day

Just another contradictory troll

Thank you for your input with this thread 6th-sense.  To those that understand what you are saying that's the correct road. 

As for The General, I'm not going to waste my time posting to him anymore.  This forum doesn't have an ignore feature that I could find.  He isn't worth the effort.  If he posts in regards to anything I now post I'll always reply Turbo KTF, he's too thick to understand anything anyone says anyway.

[The General]

Hell even put out your biased wheel numbers in it’ll show you the same results

I think that some of us have more comprehension than you give credit for

Are you winning with the method?

[Joe]

I thought there was no random In your view? You already said that in the other threads

You are contradicting yourself

Well I'm not trying to defend the general, but don't think he's contradicting himself. What I think he means is if you take any wheel from a casino then you will find it isn't completely random, but this isn't the same as taking spins from any wheel (or an RNG) and and applying the stats to any other wheel. So I think he's saying that the game is random, but particular wheels are not. He's saying that if you want to beat roulette you have to study the particular wheel you intend to play; you can't just take stats which could have been generated by a formula or taken from an RNG, because they won't necessarily apply to the particular wheel you have in mind, and if they do, the wheel wouldn't be worth playing because it would be too random.

[Mako]

Thank you for your input with this thread 6th-sense.  To those that understand what you are saying that's the correct road. 

As for The General, I'm not going to waste my time posting to him anymore.  This forum doesn't have an ignore feature that I could find.  He isn't worth the effort.  If he posts in regards to anything I now post I'll always reply Turbo KTF, he's too thick to understand anything anyone says anyway.

Same.  I hope he's doing well, have no reason to wish for his misfortune, despite him being awfully condescending and holier-than-thou to people on the board...some of whom are making 10x what he does from Roulette on an annual basis.

LOTT is not some excuse a few clowns used to explain their AP winnings years ago...it has nothing to do with that. 

It's simply a cute name system players gave the absolute irrefutable certainty that in every 37 spins you will have roughly 24 numbers arrive, with roughly 12 of them repeating, and roughly 12 remaning unhit.

Are you winning with the method?

It would blow you and Steve away to know there are a half dozen people on the board right now, two of which are in this very thread, who are making well into six figures a year as "system" players...(and one approaching seven figures...). And much of how they play the game comes from the basis of the concepts being shared here.

If you can't accept that, that's ok, we're not forcing anyone to believe anything.  But if you can't participate in a constructive way beyond the arguments you've already expressed multiple times, then remain silent.

[6th-sense]

Well I'm not trying to defend the general, but don't think he's contradicting himself. What I think he means is if you take any wheel from a casino then you will find it isn't completely random, but this isn't the same as taking spins from any wheel (or an RNG) and and applying the stats to any other wheel. So I think he's saying that the game is random, but particular wheels are not. He's saying that if you want to beat roulette you have to study the particular wheel you intend to play; you can't just take stats which could have been generated by a formula or taken from an RNG, because they won't necessarily apply to the particular wheel you have in mind, and if they do, the wheel wouldn't be worth playing because it would be too random.

Complete respect for you joe ...use Rng spins also in what I’m saying
Will show the same results

[Nimo]

Same.  I hope he's doing well, have no reason to wish for his misfortune, despite him being awfully condescending and holier-than-thou to people on the board...some of whom are making 10x what he does from Roulette on an annual basis.

LOTT is not some excuse a few clowns used to explain their AP winnings years ago...it has nothing to do with that. 

It's simply a cute name system players gave the absolute irrefutable certainty that in every 37 spins you will have roughly 24 numbers arrive, with roughly 12 of them repeating, and roughly 12 remaning unhit.

It would blow you and Steve away to know there are a half dozen people on the board right now, two of which are in this very thread, who are making well into six figures a year as "system" players...(and one approaching seven figures...). And much of how they play the game comes from the basis of the concepts being shared here.

If you can't accept that, that's ok, we're not forcing anyone to believe anything.  But if you can't participate in a constructive way beyond the arguments you've already expressed multiple times, then remain silent.

He doesn't realize the gift the right in front if him, all he would think is gif, not gift.

[Joe]

Complete respect for you joe ...use Rng spins also in what I’m saying
Will show the same results

Needless to say, I don't agree with him.  You don't need to analyse every wheel before playing it; there are some "universals" which apply regardless of the particular wheel. That doesn't mean it's easy to win though.

[6th-sense]

Same.  I hope he's doing well, have no reason to wish for his misfortune, despite him being awfully condescending and holier-than-thou to people on the board...some of whom are making 10x what he does from Roulette on an annual basis.

LOTT is not some excuse a few clowns used to explain their AP winnings years ago...it has nothing to do with that. 

It's simply a cute name system players gave the absolute irrefutable certainty that in every 37 spins you will have roughly 24 numbers arrive, with roughly 12 of them repeating, and roughly 12 remaning unhit.

It would blow you and Steve away to know there are a half dozen people on the board right now, two of which are in this very thread, who are making well into six figures a year as "system" players...(and one approaching seven figures...). And much of how they play the game comes from the basis of the concepts being shared here.

If you can't accept that, that's ok, we're not forcing anyone to believe anything.  But if you can't participate in a constructive way beyond the arguments you've already expressed multiple times, then remain silent.

It isn’t all about Lott the rolling tracker is an example ..

There’s more to the game than repeats..

There are also the unhits and unique..

[6th-sense]

Needless to say, I don't agree with him.  You don't need to analyse every wheel before playing it; there are some "universals" which apply regardless of the particular wheel. That doesn't mean it's easy to win though.

You are right of course you only need to analyse the spin cycle

[The General]

If the LOTT tracker works, then careful analysis will tell you that there's nothing there that you can exploit.

If you disagree, then perhaps you can provide an example?

[RouletteGhost]

If you disagree, then perhaps you can provide an example?

Now remember folks, years and years of winning sheets showing what he just requested will not be good enough

So move along and don’t entertain it

[The General]

Now remember folks, years and years of winning sheets showing what he just requested will not be good enough

What years and years of testing?

Just curious, why is it that nobody can seem to win with the LOTT,KFC, GUT on the MPR game?

[Madi]

What years and years of testing?

Just curious, why is it that nobody can seem to win with the LOTT,KFC, GUT on the MPR game?

Mpr is lower class facility. Player like inventor of  GUT dont water the pumpkin , they play in real wheel, real field. Thats why u dont see it here.

[The General]

Mpr is lower class facility.

Why do you suppose it is that none of the LOT players can beat it?

Again, the law of the third indicates that you can't win on the 37 pocket wheel because the house payout is short, and furthermore it indicates that for it to win consistently the player would need to play on a wheel that has only 35 or fewer pockets, at which point simply guessing numbers would be just as effective for winning.