37 back to basics

[Herby]

Is a game of Roulette not just 0x v 1x then 0x v 1x+>1x

Hi Notto,
v ... should this be a logical "OR" ?

[nottophammer]

For the General V= Fcuck off
The rest V= versus 0x v 1x

[nottophammer]

exactly what Winkel shows here, 0x's versus, extra pocket/s or not just study how non-hits can come and that applies to you General

[Herby]

For comparison, one of my simulations

[The General]

[Bigbroben]

Are we playing russian roulette with our atmosphere, General?

[Mako]

Are we playing russian roulette with our atmosphere, General?

One of the best lines I've ever read on the forum was Junscissorhands telling PassionRuletta that he should go play "RussianRuletta" instead of trying to sell systems...

[Blueprint]

One of the best lines I've ever read on the forum was Junscissorhands telling PassionRuletta that he should go play "RussianRuletta" instead of trying to sell systems...

And now junscissorhands going around selling systems... comical.

[bigmoney]

does a  dealer change have any impact on the  37 spin cycle ?

[Steve]

Ill translate generals chart. It means the other charts show irrelevant data - irrelevant to anything that may change odds. He was joining in.

Remember if odds dont change, the payout is still short

[Steve]

Instead of complain about caleb, why not test whether or not a method he criticizes changes accuracy of predictions? I don't mean test 22 spins. I mean a proper test.

[6th-sense]

As it happens, this man, Junscissorhands, said that I did not know anything and that he sold my knowledge and he did it before me and I'm sure he keeps doing it, but I'm not going to judge him because anyone is free to sell or do what you want with what you know, but logically I will not be studying for 12 years and then give all my knowledge.
I know what I have and what I do and nowadays there are many more things that people believe in and I do not care what they think, you can laugh, say bad things about me or what you want, I know what I have and with whom I will share it without any kind of business, since those people with me also share.
But I can assure you that everything that is about dyksexlic is something that has nothing to do with what is spoken or people understand, it is a process and not an event.

We have made peace and progress Sergio but this post is completely English and not how you usually come across so clearly....did u actually type this?

Junscissor hands has indeed sold his system I know this

But so what ..he also gave u
Credit for the incomplete bet u thought was. Right

And some of that knowledge was from me

He did not glean his knowledge from u
Rather u gleaned part knowledge
From me ....no difference...so ease. Up on the moral issue

[Bigbroben]

I did notice too the higher english level...

[Nimo]

Ill translate generals chart. It means the other charts show irrelevant data - irrelevant to anything that may change odds. He was joining in.

Remember if odds dont change, the payout is still short

So in say 61 spins, the payout being -2.7 on a single zero wheel.  After 61 spins at at -2.7 per spin the payout would be -$164.70, With a progression making the payout multiplying the negativity to the point where it's hopeless

What if a system, made an average of $50.36 per spin profit and does this not every time, but more than enough times to profit handsomely.  Let's even assign values.  At $50.36 profit per spin multiplied by 61 spins, that's a profit of $3072. 

3072/164.7=18.65 or roughly 5% of all games played

I would need to win once every 18.65 (5%) times to break even.  Anything more than that is pure profit.  This is important.  This is what a lot of people don't understand including Steve and The General.  Even with their so called roulette experience.  The above is math too, It's the aspect most so called roulette gurus don't fully appreciate, yet it's the key to profiting in the long run.

[luckyfella]

So in say 61 spins, the payout being -2.7 on a single zero wheel.  After 61 spins at at -2.7 per spin the payout would be -$164.70, With a progression making the payout multiplying the negativity to the point where it's hopeless

What if a system, made an average of $50.36 per spin profit and does this not every time, but more than enough times to profit handsomely.  Let's even assign values.  At $50.36 profit per spin multiplied by 61 spins, that's a profit of $3072. 

3072/164.7=18.65 or roughly 5% of all games played

I would need to win once every 18.65 (5%) times to break even.  Anything more than that is pure profit.  This is important.  This is what a lot of people don't understand including Steve and The General.  Even with their so called roulette experience.  The above is math too, It's the aspect most so called roulette gurus don't fully appreciate, yet it's the key to profiting in the long run.

Because they don't understand, because they are not even aware of how to look at systems profitability, because they don't mention this important $ aspect, their guru status is plain nonsense

Btw I play for $, not just McD combo meal