The SLAP strategy

[buffalowizard]

This is the testing zone after all, so thought I would do some 'streaming'
This lil booty just doesn't wanna bust. I am waiting for 10 and then betting from there on. If it did get to 16 with no win, then I'd suck it in and carry on perhaps with a double stake for a couple of streams, seeing as 1 loss is rare. This is because 2 losses in a row must be rarer than a very rare thing

3   4   1   2   2   4   4   2   6   1 >   5   4 w   
1   3   6   1   3   6   4   5   5   5 >   1   6   3   6 w   
5   1   2   4   2   2   6   3   5   3 >   2 w   
1   1   1   5   1   retrack
4   4   6   6   4   2   4   retrack
2   5   2   1   4   3   3   6   3   5 >   2    2 w   
4   3   4   4   5   6   2   2   4   retrack
4   6   3   3   4   6   4   1   4   retrack
1   3   3   1   2   6   5   3   5   2 >   3 w   
4   5   1   3   1   4   5   1   6   5 >   2   1 w   
6   1   3   2   3   2   4   6   2   1 >   2 w   
1   4   5   5   6   1   6   3   5   5  retrack
4   4   4   1   4   retrack
1   2   6   6   1   3   5   3   1   6 >   1 w   
6   3   2   5   1   1   1   5   2   2 >   5   2 w
4   4   3   4   4   retrack
1   6   1   6   5   3   1   1   retrack
3   2   1   4   4   5   3   1   6   2    2 >   2 w   Had to go from 11 due to no qualifiers here.

[MrJ]

Funny thing about the boards......lets SAY, this holds up pretty well and we are all patting each other on the back.

In three months, they'll be very few additional posts, nobody talking about it anymore, few people playing it and members sitting around waiting for the next best thing. Not trying to sound like mister negative but I have seen it go down like this hundreds of times in the past.

Ken

[buffalowizard]

That's right Ken,

Usually a single loss is enough to put off 99% of viewers!

[RouletteGhost]

At times we will be betting more than 1 DS correct? If there are 2 or 3 qualifier

[atlantis]

Hi Buffalowizard,

Yes those are exactly the sorts of results I'm getting.

You wrote:

This is because 2 losses in a row must be rarer than a very rare thing

That really made me guffaw! 

@RouletteGhost

This works on airball. Virtual bets today on it no real money

Great stuff RG!

@MrJ
Cheers Ken for the warning. Hope you are wrong though Anyhow, I do know what you mean

A.

[RouletteGhost]

Using this example from buffalo wizard

1   3   6   1   3   6   4   5   5   5 >   1   6   3   6 w 

thats means we will bet DS 1 and DS 6?

Or just DS 6? If so, why? Thanks

[buffalowizard]

Using this example from buffalo wizard

1   3   6   1   3   6   4   5   5   5 >   1   6   3   6 w

thats means we will bet DS 1 and DS 6?

Or just DS 6? If so, why? Thanks

5 is the only qualifier, then 1 qualifies, followed straight after by 6. So then it becomes a 3 line bet - same as an EC. It then becomes a 4 line bet when 3 shows up, then wins straight after with the 4th hit on 6. A tricky stream, but still before 16.

[buffalowizard]

Be good to get some kind of progression chart for each eventuality, as they show up. I can't get my head around increasing DS bets

[buffalowizard]

Some further testing - interesting results

6   6   3   4   5   6   6   retrack
5   3   4   1   2   1   6   6   1   2 >   1 w   
5   1   3   2   2   5   5   3   4   6 >   1   6   1   4   2   1 w (holy mackerel, almost loss #1, but no it held
4   3   5   3   3   5   2   1   6   3 retrack
1   1   6   3   6   2   6   2   3   6 retrack
3   6   2   2   1   4   2   2   retrack
6   1   6   4   5   5   5   1   3   5 retrack
2   2   2   4   6   3   6   4   6   5 >   2 w   
6   4   2   6   2   4   6   1   6   retrack
5   2   3   6   2   3   2   1   3   5 >   2 w   
2   5   5   5   3   3   3   1   5   5 retrack
1   6   2   3   5   2   1   1   2   2 retrack
3   3   4   4   2   6   5   6   1   4 >   1   3   4 w   
5   3   3   5   6   2   4   2   1   4    5 >   6   6   4   5 w   tracked from 11 due to no qulaifiers
6   6   6   3   3   2   3   6   retrack
1   2   5   1   5   6   4   4   2   6    5 >   3   1   4   3   3    2 Loss! First one I've seen, the question is, how much -£ would that put you in?
2   6   3   5   3   5   3   4   4   5 >   6   1   2   1   3 w   
2   6   4   2   6   6   6   retrack

[Chris555p]

@Atlantis - Thanks for the clarification and have a great new year.

[atlantis]

5 is the only qualifier, then 1 qualifies, followed straight after by 6. So then it becomes a 3 line bet - same as an EC. It then becomes a 4 line bet when 3 shows up, then wins straight after with the 4th hit on 6. A tricky stream, but still before 16.

Hi BW. Yes it was a tricky one. They can happen but if you had set your entry point to AFTER 11 instead of AFTER 10 spins then

bet 1: 2x1=2 L    -2
bet 2: 3x1=3 L    -5
bet 3: 4x3=6 W   +1

Its not so bad. 4 qualifiers - doesn't happen too much- and the win comes after 3 rounds of betting at spin 14.
However - If that bet had lost then its -17u.
In that instance maybe its better to abandon string for safety and retrack after the win occurs?? Then again surely the win cannot be far away?

Thanks for posting your results,
A.

[ddarko]

As this requires a progression could Lanky's Divisor be adapted/used for this ?

gl

[atlantis]

Some further testing - interesting results

6   6   3   4   5   6   6   retrack
5   3   4   1   2   1   6   6   1   2 >   1 w   
5   1   3   2   2   5   5   3   4   6 >   1   6   1   4   2   1 w (holy mackerel, almost loss #1, but no it held
4   3   5   3   3   5   2   1   6   3 retrack
1   1   6   3   6   2   6   2   3   6 retrack
3   6   2   2   1   4   2   2   retrack
6   1   6   4   5   5   5   1   3   5 retrack
2   2   2   4   6   3   6   4   6   5 >   2 w   
6   4   2   6   2   4   6   1   6   retrack
5   2   3   6   2   3   2   1   3   5 >   2 w   
2   5   5   5   3   3   3   1   5   5 retrack
1   6   2   3   5   2   1   1   2   2 retrack
3   3   4   4   2   6   5   6   1   4 >   1   3   4 w   
5   3   3   5   6   2   4   2   1   4    5 >   6   6   4   5 w   tracked from 11 due to no qulaifiers
6   6   6   3   3   2   3   6   retrack
1   2   5   1   5   6   4   4   2   6    5 >   3   1   4   3   3    2 Loss! First one I've seen, the question is, how much -£ would that put you in?
2   6   3   5   3   5   3   4   4   5 >   6   1   2   1   3 w   
2   6   4   2   6   6   6   retrack

Hi BW,

Looks like the inevitable cracks are starting to appear!?

Yes it is first loser I've seen and would cost -34 (corrected)

The betting would be stopped on Spin 16 - so no further bet after the qualifying line 3.

1  2   5   1   5   6   4   4   2   6    5q >   3   1q   4q   3   3q  (16 spins reached here)

bet1= 1x1 L1  = -1
bet2= 1x1 L1  = -2
bet3= 2x2 L4  = -7
bet4= 3x3 L9  = -16
bet5= 3x6 L18 = -34

A.

[buffalowizard]

Still an extremely solid method well worth more testing

-34 on a a single recorded progression loss?

That's just over 5 steps of a marty for goodness sake and how common are they?!

[RouletteGhost]

Way more then 30 units made before that?