The Non-Random Master Strategy

[falkor2k15]

I'll run a few tests based on what you are describing, but I'm anything but optimistic that your kind of thinking will yield any bias. All the WL outcomes and AP types seem grid-locked 50/50 regardless of entry points.

[RayManZ]

Or maybe it's the other way around.

If an AP wins there is a greater change that the next AP also wins.

[falkor2k15]

Or maybe it's the other way around.

If an AP wins there is a greater change that the next AP also wins.

But that's different... you mean playing for multiple APs within the 9 spin cycle, but Priyanka's LW combos are based on only 1 AP per 9 spins (we retrack each time after first win). We are meant to take the LW combinations and figure out some simple apples and pears solution just from that. For multiple APs within 9 spins I already have a solution, but it's more complex.

[falkor2k15]

Test failed...

[RayManZ]

i have no clue what you just tested...

[falkor2k15]

i have no clue what you just tested...

AP1/16: 1,2,3 not played, i.e. 0 chips placed (missed out/virtual)
The rest of mechanical rules are the same: retrack after 1 win or 9 spins/clash.

[RayManZ]

try this:

only play after a AP loss. After a win reset. So does not matter what AP loss. We need a loss first. On deadlock reset ofcourse.

[falkor2k15]

Failed...

[falkor2k15]

Hold on... there's a bug... I need to retrack after any clash since 1 AP is always formed straight after.   Will re-attempt the tests soon.

[falkor2k15]

They still failed even with appropriate retracking...

[falkor2k15]

I'VE SOLVED IT!!!! It was staring me in the face all along... uses one of Priyanka's other main concepts. It's even compatible with the multiple AP solution, which also uses that concept - yet I never thought about applying it to the single AP method. Together they should result in nice edge! In fact, this is very similar to the complex methods I discovered - but in microcosm.   

[falkor2k15]

Anyway, we wouldn't use this in the master strategy, but it's good to know all the same... too interesting to pass up on.

[MoneyT101]

I only play the first two bets from vdw....if lose first one i play second.  after that i wait for it to finish 9 to start up or reset after a win.


RayManz, your saying to wait for first Loss then start playing.  If a W then reset.  hmmmmm I can see that working

Falkor, is that what you tested it?

[RouletteGhost]

I'VE SOLVED IT!!!! It was staring me in the face all along... uses one of Priyanka's other main concepts. It's even compatible with the multiple AP solution, which also uses that concept - yet I never thought about applying it to the single AP method. Together they should result in nice edge! In fact, this is very similar to the complex methods I discovered - but in microcosm.   

An edge?

[jdbookers]

Hello everyone, Im new to the forum, and aren't really sure where to post my question. I have studied lots of statistics posted by other on high number spins (1 million and above), which has great data, but the data never mentions the frequency of each sequence. For example it will mention the frequency of a B/R max occurrence of 22 times over a 12 million spin count, or similar stats on each regularly desired data points. But I have not been able to find any data on how often the other frequencies occur. You could estimate statistically using math but Ive always found that the RNG spin tests always vary enough to make a difference. Im looking to get data on how many times each successive frequency occurs. Example - straight betting -over 12million spins, how many times did a 3 sequence occur, a 4 sequence occur, a 5 sequence occur, etc. Does anyone have any idea what direction i could possibly find this information.

Thanks