ATTENTION ! Street system that passed 10.000 spins!

[Tomla021]

link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=18110.0

[Colbster]

Type in Eggleston or Eggleston Betting Method.  The link that Tomla has provided is to the 2.0 version, which is an improvement over the first in terms of bet selection.  However, the math is more clearly explained in my original post.

You are completely correct about the flat bet being possible, and that will most likely be the foundation of 3.0 when I get around to solidifying it.  As you will see after reading the explanation, our expectation will be a little over +3 units every 37 spins on a European table, even after losing out to the 0.  Better than +1 in 38 spins on an American wheel, and +5.xx on a no-zero table.  The math is right, I just lack the coding ability to do large-scale testing.  I have been free-handing it the whole time.

[amk]

I may have posted the link incorrectly. 

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3608.msg32538#msg32538

seems to get me there with no problem.  I started playing my original method, and with amazing results, as are chronicled in the original thread.  I took my small bankroll to nearly 10 times my starting amount and then made a critical error that killed me:  I hit the 50 euro button instead of the 0.50 euro and blew my bankroll in one bad spin.  400 euro out the window!  Now, I don't have any extra money to start with again, so I have gone back to playing around with other systems, looking for a better bet selection method to tie in with my staking method.  If I can find a better bet selection, I could theoretically turn a modest edge into an amazing edge and be that much better off.

I posted my original method, as well as a version 2.0, in hopes of getting honest feedback and improvement on my method.  I am as convinced as ever or the mathematical edge it provides, but I know that it could still be improved on.  My money management/progression, for instance, seems to be the weak point, so I spend time playing around with different concepts while the money is still imaginary.  When the money is real again, I look forward to having a solid plan that will overcome what the felt throws at me.

Even when I do play real money, I will still spend time here playing with theory.  I actually came to roulette as a way to help me go to sleep at night, as my mind runs numbers when I try to sleep.  I didn't expect to play with real money, or to find a way to beat roulette.  My method seems to have just found me.  When I know it works, I will bot it and go back to playing with variations to keep my mind active.  I don't feel that I need to defend my work to anyone - they read it and agree or disagree.  The facts speak for themselves, and it allows me to put the work out there for public consumption without any fear of embarrassment. 

I hope that link works and you find my numbers as exciting as I do.

Best wishes!

Great post Colbster,

Man, can't believe you hit that 50 button.............!

I hope you just started over again, should work right................

[Blood Angel]

I have been free-handing it the whole time.

Hi Colbster,
A very interesting post...In regards to the above comment  do you know how many spins you have done and what your plus is on your starting bankroll?
Thank you.

[Colbster]

Real money, I took 40 euros to a little over 400 before losing it on the wrong unit bet. That took me a couple weeks of a session or two daily.  Grand  total, I expect I have done 50 to 100k spins between my various methods, split between play and real money. I'm not a session recorder, but I am comfortably up in the long term.

[woods101]

...er...you mean VIP don't you?

[ophis]

This system is now coded inside of Multi Systems Tracker.

[hamsup_sotong]

nice work ophis 

cheers hamsup

[jarabo002]

Thank you very much for your system Mr. Roulette Explorer and for your work Mr. Ophis.

[Chrisbis]

I took my small bankroll to nearly 10 times my starting amount and then made a critical error that killed me:  I hit the 50 euro button instead of the 0.50 euro and blew my bankroll in one bad spin.  400 euro out the window!  Now, I don't have any extra money to start with again,

You can now go about your business knowing your not the only one who has done this 'critical error'!
Happened to me yesterday. Cry!

 

[Normy2000]

Yep, it append!     

[figjams95]

Roulette Explorer, you mentioned in your post that "turbo Genius" has posted systems that have passed 15,000 spins and still "won"...do you know where they are posted or what they were, etc...
New member looking for something with a reasonable expectation of some wins/profits if possible...
Peter

[iggiv]

link:://turbogenius.webs.com/

beware though, there are NO WINNERS there

[figjams95]

iggiv, do u play roulette at all and if so, how do u play (if u don't mind me asking)...

Peter

[Turner]

This is right up my street. Ive been a wee bit obsessed with sectors performing in the law of the third as a single entity, meaning.....0,32 is group 1: 15, 19 is group2 etc. As a single entity, they act with LOTT.
0,0 is 2 hits in group one. 15,19 is also 2 hits in group 2 etc.

All the streets make 12 groups of 3, and over 12 spins some show some double some treble.

I have been trying this idea but not on the sleepers, but on hits of 2 or more.

It has had some success, but still trying different bets. I really like the "revert to 1 chip each tome you are in profit"

If a double appears, I bet on it along with the other repeats. If a double (which I may have 3 chips on at this stage) goes back to 1 hit, I take it off and add a chip to the others. Similar to RE's idea but kinda in reverse. It reminds me of the D'Alembert system where you recoup your losses over a marked period ie. investing in doubles (or sleepers in the other idea) until they come out.

More testing needed