Roulette Method of the Year is?

[esoito]

@ Chrisbis
"Its not about ranking Es."

Of course it's about ranking!!!

How else can a verdict be reached in deciding "The Roulette Method of the Year"?

There remains also the potential for public humiliation.

Like I say -- not happy.



[As an aside I thought much of what you wrote in the rest of your post was very sound and positive...still love ya!]

[chrisbis]

It is now in the formate that POSTING STATS are being used yes, but I assumed,

the whole idea was about recognition, not who came first, who second, who third,

but more.............. F lat Ino.... & Ophis............did a great Job with the Promised............

and ......................XXVV kept up the whole Matrix thingy mer-bob going......................

and .....................Katti/Drog/Proof/Others provided the forum with some in-depth, thought provoking systems, whilst everyone was searching for a Jack or Queen or Two!!

That the sort of mentions I assumed we would be getting.

(Not to forget GLC)


Every member has a favourite.

A favourite post they read,
A favourite Topic they always dive straight into when they log on
A favourite member who they like to e=read the latest info from
A favourite moment in the year (Roulette Forum.cc year that is)

So you would rather, no-one mentions their favourites would U, no "measurement" of the effort= no-one can get upset....................is that how you view it Esoito?

[flukey luke]

Don't forget that there are loads of people who probably read this forum without ever posting. So speaking for myself,  I would not take it personal if I did not get voted for anything.
We all contribute in our own way. It takes a lot of different personalities to make a great forum.  It would be a shame for everybody involved if people stopped posting ideas because they felt a bit left out. I am sure all of us who voice our opinions have our fans and hecklers out there, LoL.

As far as the comp goes, it is fair to say that Flat and Ophis have spent a lot of time with fellow members trying to help them understand the CONSTANT WINNING METHOD and do indeed deserve some special praise.

Let's not let personal feelings get in the way of creating an even better forum which can all help turn us into better players.  

[WannaWin]

It is worthwhile to do some form or another of system testing. Just to have published a method does not mean there is a guarantee. There are never guarantees and that is implicit.

For what the author is concerned to get feedback and tweaks to improve the system originally published is his gain.

To user Esoito: feel free not to publish the systems, but I do not believe you do it for the right reasons. Avoiding publishing a method because it gets tested in the forum can not be the right reason.

We really have to put things in perspective. Roulette is a game with negative expectancy which is expected to lose in the long term. I can honestly say there is no shame in publishing as all systems are subject to a matched field at -2.7% expectation.

There is only community gains to post a method for further examination and tweaking. It can start or branch into something good for others as it has happened in the past.

Greetings.
WannaWin

[esoito]

Just to be clear:  I'm all in favour of public recognition and public thanks to the Roulette Method posters.

I'm just not in favour at all of ranking them into winners/non-winners.

In stating that I'm simpy addressing some of the phrases already used in this discussion such as:

"...who will win the "System of the Year..."

"...and winner system should be selected by Voting ..."

"The winning system gets..."

...and so on...

But, on reflection, I've no objection to a contest for those that want to be in it.

But at the moment they are not being asked.

Suggestion 1:

ASK the roulette Method posters FIRST if they want to be entered into the contest.

If yes, then fine. Carry on.

If no, then that's OK. They don't want to be in the contest and their wishes must be respected.


At the moment nobody seems to have thought of extending the courtesy of ASKING them first...

[A3on]

And now we have the solution for it.
I agree with Esoito, the roulette method poster should be informed first.

[esoito]

Suggestion 2:

1 Announce the contest.

2  INVITE those that want to be in it to give their permission for their Method/system to be entered into the contest.

In that way only those that want to be in it enter the contest with their eyes open.

[VLS]

Suggestion 2:

1 Announce the contest.

2  INVITE those that want to be in it to give their permission for their Method/system to be entered into the contest.

In that way only those that want to be in it enter the contest with their eyes open.

Fair enough!



P.S. This thread is all about suggestions. Thread  starter suggested VOTING, and I literally said: "I would like to see more..."

We are just suggesting, friendly

[albalaha]

In my perception, it is not a contest or competition but merely recognition of the best effort. The proposed "method of the year" should be tested upon 10 different sessions having 100 spins each and the best performing system can be conferred this title and made sticky for entire year till next year a new method takes over. Simple.

[Ron]

The last two people have voted for a PERSON and not a method.   LoL.   My vote would have to go to the Vortex System by Hermes.   It has worked for me flawlessly and I am greatly appreciative of him posting it. 

could you plz give me a link for vortex system? thanks a lot. 

[GLC]

In my perception, it is not a contest or competition but merely recognition of the best effort. The proposed "method of the year" should be tested upon 10 different sessions having 100 spins each and the best performing system can be conferred this title and made sticky for entire year till next year a new method takes over. Simple.

I add my vote to this method of selecting a system.

I don't think the system author should nominate the system.

As a matter of fact, the system author should have nothing to with the process except they should have veto rights if they don't want their system nominated.  I can't imagine this could be an option, but someone might not want their system considered.

[reincarnation]

It would be great, if the forum can have some sort of "voting" system where in the members can vote for the system that they consider the best.

[Ron]

Voting system would be great!!!

[A3on]

could you plz give me a link for vortex system? thanks a lot. 

link:://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/vortex-roulette-system/

[chrisbis]

My Roulette Method of the Year goes to:-





Everyone who took the time, effort and energy to Log-in, Read, Post, Log-out.

Well done chaps, on what can only be described as an awesome Year.
(past 4 months for me)

Happy New Year To All members (and yes U 2 VIP/Jordan), and to all our visiting guests.

See U all in 2011. A year when Victor has a momentous date with number destiny!!!
(it has nothing to do with the Tipping TooL either!)



Don't forget to bring the coal lump through the front door just after midnight and welcome the New Year into Ur home wherever that maybe.
Oh, and maybe a wee dram of Ur favourite tipple with ye too. CHEERS!!



And since I was stopped today in a breath test road check- all clear BTW, please, please,
do not even think of DRINKING, AND DRIVING - EVER. (it is so not worth it)