A must read for all the ppl that are searching for a CWB

[RouletteExplorer]

I have an anouncement to make that it is the biggest and most important anouncement that has ever been made in a Roulette Forum.

We all know and remember the W.3.M site.

Most of you know that I was the person that never beleaved in the concept of the CWB and that I had exposed Charles in his own forum.(some of you know the story)

I really don t know if Charles ever had the ACTF bet.I really don t know if he is a scam or not,eventhogh he scammed all those ppl.

But what I  know Is that a CWB really exists ,because I have found it.

The funny and strange thing is that all the clues that Charles had posted in his site about the ACTF bet ,were the clues that made me find the bet.

Let me explain what I mean.
I found a bet (formula)according to the clue”trap the runs and the changes” that was not a consistent winner but it wasn t a consistent loser either!
This thing made me a HUGE impresssion,because nothing can survive after 3.000 spins by FLAT BETTING!
The tests I did were 30 sesssions of 100 spins each.(as Charles adviced)
The results were very close to 0 in every end of the 100 spins(bets)
I had ofcource some sessions ended up  like +15 or even +40 but I also had some of them ended up like -1 or -15.
But in the end of the total 3.000 bets ,the result were close to 0.
Then I also remembered that Charles had said that if we would find a bet that doesn t win but doesn t lose either ,that we must find a bet inside that bet in order to engineer and CWB.
It took me 2 days to find it .
This was the BASE bet ,that that when I added it to the main bet ,I had a CWB.

I really don t know if Charles had made those clues from his a$$ in order to scam the ppl .
But it seems very strange that all those SPECIFIC clues were fitting in my bet.
I haven t played the bet in a casino yet.
I am waitting tomorrow that I will get payed from my job in order to have the BR.
I hope that a carrier of a pro roulette played has started for me.

After my expirience with the CWB ,I advice all of you to stop  searching the maths of roulette ,because we all know that the game can t be beaten by that way.

Don t send me any Pms ,because this was my last post in the forum.
The last time I said that it was my last post ,I was telling the truth,and I would not post anything ,BUT I thought that this post  is a vital read of all the ppl that still beleave in CWBs.

Good luck.

[Robeenhuut]

I have an anouncement to make that it is the biggest and most important anouncement that has ever been made in a Roulette Forum.

We all know and remember the W.3.M site.

Most of you know that I was the person that never beleaved in the concept of the consistent winning bet and that I had exposed Charles Scammer in his own forum.(some of you know the story)

I really don't know if Charles Scammer ever had the ACTF bet.I really don't know if he is a scam or not,eventhogh he scammed all those people.

But what I  know Is that a consistent winning bet really exists ,because I have found it.

The funny and strange thing is that all the clues that Charles Scammer had posted in his site about the ACTF bet ,were the clues that made me find the bet.

Let me explain what I mean.
I found a bet (formula)according to the clue”trap the runs and the changes” that was not a consistent winner but it wasn t a consistent loser either!
This thing made me a HUGE impresssion,because nothing can survive after 3.000 spins by FLAT BETTING!
The tests I did were 30 sesssions of 100 spins each.(as Charles Scammer adviced)
The results were very close to 0 in every end of the 100 spins(bets)
I had ofcource some sessions ended up  like +15 or even +40 but I also had some of them ended up like -1 or -15.
But in the end of the total 3.000 bets ,the result were close to 0.
Then I also remembered that Charles Scammer had said that if we would find a bet that doesn't win but doesn't lose either ,that we must find a bet inside that bet in order to engineer and consistent winning bet.
It took me 2 days to find it .
This was the BASE bet ,that that when I added it to the main bet ,I had a consistent winning bet.

I really don't know if Charles Scammer had made those clues from his a$$ in order to scam the people .
But it seems very strange that all those SPECIFIC clues were fitting in my bet.
I haven t played the bet in a casino yet.
I am waitting tomorrow that I will get payed from my job in order to have the BR.
I hope that a carrier of a pro roulette played has started for me.

After my experience with the consistent winning bet ,I advice all of you to stop  searching the maths of roulette ,because we all know that the game can t be beaten by that way.

don't send me any Pms ,because this was my last post in the forum.
The last time I said that it was my last post ,I was telling the truth,and I would not post anything ,BUT I thought that this post  is a vital read of all the people that still beleave in consistent winning bets.

Good luck.

Hello RE

Thanks for letting me win a bet that you would be back despite your hurt feelings last time. And we will of course stop playing because you have THE ONLY method that works and unfortunately we will never see it.
Maybe you will reconsider 

Regards

[F_LAT_INO]

---Bet you be back as usual,if anything but to tell us how
    wrong you were regarding the bet.

[Chrisbis]

R.E. 's 1st post on here is as bad as saying this....................

"I have a consistent winning bet.............and I will tell U what it is, as soon as I am paid from my job"

What is the point.

Just tell Us man.

I'm sick to death of people coming here with utter nonsense posts, and then not wanting to say any more on the subject.

R.E.'s best/better/finest strategy, would have been to guide us all to this mystical land,
instead of casting Us adrift into the 'Sea of Useless Knowledge'

I for one hope he doesn't come back and gloat any further on this topic.

Hey, wasn't this the very same man, who used to come here, and denigrate everyone's systems and routines, as not ever been able to work!?! Isn't this the same man.

Doesn't that tell U something?

Its a shame really, because JUST occasionally, Jordan HAS come up with useful, purposeful posts, like his Streets thread, that exploded onto forum few months ago.

But now we are back to the OLD Jordan.............the Negative one.

The one who is all:- "I have something U can not share in"

Nightmare!

[ego]

I have been around for many, many years regarding roulette forums and this post is common.
You see many times does who say they find the ultimate selection and will never get back.
Or you have does that just move around in circuls prommising the ultimate bet witch never at the end will see daylight.

Nothing new - old and boring.
Sometimes they get back with a new user name or they give up or just change there place to hang around.

[Skakus]

Viper always was a twit, but this takes the cake, really!

[Blood Angel]

You've had so many " great" bets I'm not sure anyone cares any more.

[MAX]

Good luck.

Regards
Max

[woods101]

DNFTT.

[monaco]

I found a bet (formula)according to the clue”trap the runs and the changes” that was not a consistent winner but it wasn t a consistent loser either!
This thing made me a HUGE impresssion,because nothing can survive after 3.000 spins by FLAT BETTING!
The tests I did were 30 sesssions of 100 spins each.(as Charles scammer adviced)
The results were very close to 0 in every end of the 100 spins(bets)
I had ofcource some sessions ended up  like +15 or even +40 but I also had some of them ended up like -1 or -15.
But in the end of the total 3.000 bets ,the result were close to 0.

I can gather that there is a whole history in forums that i am not completely aware of - different names/characters seem to pop up under different guises, i've seen it mentioned many times the whole CEH/w3m scam thing but don't really get what it was all about.

Can anyone give a quick resume of the whole story? In a nutshell, did he say he had a flatbetting winning method, then started charging people only to disappear?

* more generally, if anyone can help, a flatbetting method such as RE's posted above would require what kind of progression to get the most out of it? (that is to say, a flatbet that does not fluctuate much + or - over 2000/3000 spins..)

[F_LAT_INO]

* more generally, if anyone can help, a flatbetting method such as RE's posted above would require what kind of progression to get the most out of it? (that is to say, a flatbet that does not fluctuate much + or - over 2000/3000 spins..)



---Probably 99% of the members are seeking the same thing.

[monaco]

* more generally, if anyone can help, a flatbetting method such as RE's posted above would require what kind of progression to get the most out of it? (that is to say, a flatbet that does not fluctuate much + or - over 2000/3000 spins..)



---Probably 99% of the members are seeking the same thing.

i don't mean what would the flatbet method be,

i mean, if you already had the flatbet method that was stable over 3000 spins as suggested by RE, what progression would you apply to it to maximise its profit? d'Alembert? Labby? 6 point divisor? Up & Pull? Parlay?

[hanshuckebein]

in my opinion this would depend on the bet itself.

still, if I had such a flatbet-winner, I would not use a progression but increase my betting units instead.

cheers

hans

[monaco]

in my opinion this would depend on the bet itself.

still, if I had such a flatbet-winner, I would not use a progression but increase my betting units instead.

cheers

hans

Thanks Hans

but if the flatbet doesn't actually win, it just 'doesn't lose' as RE stated, you would need to add in a progression to get anything out of it wouldn't you? Say it just hovers around +/- 10 units for thousands of spins..

[kingsroulette]

No bet can predict future outcome with even slightest accuracy hence no bet can be consistant winner.