@ turbo

[cht]

Cht, The later and i already explained that myself. What's your point, exactly?

My main point is this -

repeater or hot number players build their system based on frequency distribution of 37 cycles.

This means the frequency distribution probability is relevant to their game.

More than that is this basic understanding of repeaters or hot numbers as understood by the repeater/hot numbers system player.
This definition is important so that all participants are on the same page to make your comments relevant.

This counter-argument of the probability of individual spins, is correct in itself, is not directly relevant to repeaters system making this thread a disjointed banter.

[Steve]

If thats their approach then it's the same fallacy as expecting a balance in numbers. It doesn't work.

This counter-argument of the probability of individual spins, is correct in itself, is not directly relevant to repeaters system

You're neglecting the 1 in 37 odds applies to individual spins, which make up groups of spins.

[cht]

If thats their approach then it's the same fallacy as expecting a balance in numbers. It doesn't work.

You're neglecting the 1 in 37 odds applies to individual spins, which make up groups of spins.

Repeaters system players base their model exploiting frequency distribution probability.

This frequency distribution is derived from the individual spin model of 37 pockets.

This does not inversely mean they ignore the probability of individual spins, as you suggest.

[MoneyT101]

Andre try to wrap your head around this since you keep asking questions about it....

Dozens will be the easiest way to explain it... There are 27 possible combinations for a dozen within 3 spins. 

21 have a repeat and only 6 don’t have a repeat.

Repeats
111
112
113
121
131
122
133
222
221
223
212
232
211
233
333
331
332
313
323
311
322

No repeat
123
132
213
231
312
321

Now what are the chances with straights? Turbo show them those zeroes hahaha

So Steve chances of getting a repeat within 37 spins far outweighs chances of getting all 37 numbers.  A repeater method can win just needs to be built on the concept.

Dyksexlic tried to prove this like a decade ago... you still arguing with ppl about it 😂

[MoneyT101]

Dyksexlic posted this in the old forum

Imagine I have a big bag of 37 numbered balls (each ball has a different number from 0 to 36 printed on it). I cant see the balls in the bag. They are 'randomly' mixed up.

I place my hand in the bag to pick a ball, then write the number down on a sheet of paper. I then place the ball back in the bag, then shake the bag up and mix up the 37 numbers, then place my hand back in the bag and pick another ball, again write the number down on the paper and place the ball back in the bag, and so on...

I keep on picking numbers in this way until I have a list of 38 numbers on my sheet of paper..

When I look at the list of 38 numbers on the paper, I find to my surprise that they are all different numbers EXCEPT one which is written down TWICE.

No matter how many times I repeat the experiment, I always end up with a list of 38 numbers on my sheet of paper with (at least) one number written down TWICE. ALWAYS the same, 36 numbers written down once, and one number written down twice..
(consecutively or not)

I discovered that ALL roulette RNGs (Random Number Generators) MUST follow this repeating number principle. This suddenly took away any UNCERTAINTY associated with placing a bet on roulette.I had done it ! I had BEATEN roulette..

[cht]

Another 5consecutive winning games just for you. luck streak looks pretty good.

The attachment graphs didn't appear. Here it is again.

ok that's all the time I have. take a look at 6th-sense thread if anyone is interested .

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=20411.0

[Steve]

Repeaters system players base their model exploiting frequency distribution probability.

Big words, but in what context?

Do you mean the expected frequency that numbers will be distributed?

That doesnt help at all either. Its classic misunderstanding, similar to "there will be a balance".

Still you repeaters guys havent explained one valid theory that can be used to change odds. And if you dont change odds, you've changed nothing.

[cht]

Big words, but in what context?

Do you mean the expected frequency that numbers will be distributed?

That doesnt help at all either. Its classic misunderstanding, similar to "there will be a balance".

Still you repeaters guys havent explained one valid theory that can be used to change odds. And if you dont change odds, you've changed nothing.

You have a valid complain that TG has not revealed how he exploits hotties.

[Steve]

I'm not asking TG at the moment, I'm asking you. Remember you gave your so-called proof here. If you cant explain how the principle is valid, and I've explained how it is not valid, you may as well have posted nothing.

[jekhb76]

Just a question to All.

Q.
How many repeats Have you seen Max out before one turned into a tripple ?
And Max spins that this happend?
Thanks.

[cht]

I'm not asking TG at the moment, I'm asking you. Remember you gave your so-called proof here. If you cant explain how the principle is valid, and I've explained how it is not valid, you may as well have posted nothing.

Oh my mistake.

I have answered your question a few times already.
I will not go further then what I have posted on forum.
If anyone is interested, they can read more from 6-th sense thread - the link I posted above.
All I will say is some members have made good bank playing repeaters with real money.

[Roulettebeater]

Dyksexlic posted this in the old forum

! I had BEATEN roulette..

You had beaten your ar**!

[cht]

I'm not asking TG at the moment, I'm asking you. Remember you gave your so-called proof here. If you cant explain how the principle is valid, and I've explained how it is not valid, you may as well have posted nothing.

About the graphs, Gandhi asked earlier so I obliged him. No worries I wont post that again.

[jekhb76]

The more i think about Steve, the More i get the feeling that Steve is acting the way he does is maybe hoping that TG or anyone else Will reveil there HG on this Forum  i can't find Any other logical way to explain why he acts like he does.
This won't happen Steve, even with bashing everyone everyday, we are Smart enough not to do that.

[Roulettebeater]

Jek

Turbo has no HG to offer, all what he has is losing system that based on a fallacy