#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => General Discussion => Topic started by: ozon on Sep 30, 02:08 PM 2015

Title: The theoretical question.
Post by: ozon on Sep 30, 02:08 PM 2015
Theoretically, if using Rng and waiting for a trigger when the first 20 spins, we have the advantage of an event of 10 bets (12 reds-2 blacks), we begin betting on black.
Using safebreaks after 4 losers in wait for the virtual win, which also gives us the advantage over variance, and using Labby with stoplose 1,000 units, while playing profit target 1 unit.
Are we able to lose, and why.
I Know That kind of trigger is fallacy, but Taking the advantage of 10 losers in the beginning, reducing the variance to 40% using safebreaks and using Labby with big BR maybe we can survive the worst sessions from hell which know.
We know that can happen, that it will be only 25 hits in the first 100 spins.
Is this strategy is able to survive  and  why  not?
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: ddarko on Sep 30, 02:34 PM 2015
I would say it wouldn't survive because you need one thousand winning sessions (1X1000=$1000) to
cover one loss (1X1000=$1000)

That is a shed load of winning sessions to cover just one loss.

O0
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Sep 30, 02:38 PM 2015
Depends who you ask

RNG can be funny

Lots of respected members say it is not rigged, though
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: ozon on Sep 30, 02:51 PM 2015
I know that this is 1000 triggers, but safety is included in this method, the question is whether this strategy can withstand the worst variance. Because if it is able to withstand a loss once in a few thousand, it does not matter.
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: denzie on Sep 30, 03:14 PM 2015
Nope, that will bust. Never use 1000u to win 1u.
Another question : if one of the ec is 42%( 42/3/55)... and we start flatbet the 42 side....what's gonna happen you think? Let's take RNG too...much faster

Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: denzie on Sep 30, 03:27 PM 2015
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 30, 02:38 PM 2015
Depends who you ask

Lots of respected members say it is not rigged, though

Don't get it twisted Sparky... choose your casino wisely. Cuz there are probably more rigged ones out there then trustworthy ones
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: ozon on Sep 30, 03:37 PM 2015
This kind of strategy from the first post, can function with stoplose -60 units, in 98% do not go above so my question whether the 1000 unit bankrol can withstand the worst, I do not have any software to simulate ,that my questions.
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Sep 30, 03:53 PM 2015
when u play rng roulette it doesnt matter how u ll bet , when its time to loose , u ll lose! !
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Sep 30, 03:58 PM 2015
Quote from: petespin on Sep 30, 03:53 PM 2015
when u play rng roulette it doesnt matter how u ll bet , when its time to loose , u ll lose! !

Armageddon may be upon us

I agree with pete spin here
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Sep 30, 04:05 PM 2015
speaking seriously guys there is not rng roulette in fact but only a software which can read your actions and adjusting accordingly , its that simple , dont be fooled ! u will never find NOT  rigged online roulette and games aswell , just do an experiment , let your account inactive for some time ,and then play any game u want u, ll win becoz they want to show u that good things are coming , simply to allure u!!
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Sep 30, 04:13 PM 2015
all i can say its that iam glad that we find something to agree with RG !!
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: ddarko on Sep 30, 04:38 PM 2015
Petespin & RG agreeing ? Yikes......

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY (link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0GFRcFm-aY)

O0
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 05:20 AM 2015
again, no jokes, the end of the world is coming, before icebergs melt in antarctica, this is going to happen,  seems to me is so close !! read the bible guys !
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 09:39 AM 2015
i guess , no religious here!! ^-^
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 09:42 AM 2015
Quote from: petespin on Oct 01, 05:20 AM 2015
again, no jokes, the end of the world is coming, before icebergs melt in antarctica, this is going to happen,  seems to me is so close !! read the bible guys !

United states backing syrian rebels who may be terrorists. Russia now bombing the rebels. May start WW3
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 09:51 AM 2015
now iam talking serious , GOD said ' i keep the ice for the day of my fury' , well i dont know if its the right translation in english, i hope it makes sense .. think the icebergs melt so fast , anyway its not like u think about ww3 , it will not like this, this is a GOD S war , not between humans , its the good against evil ..... propably naturally catastrophe , HE SAID 'noone knows the day and the time even the son[jesus]'   ..........armagedon
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 10:02 AM 2015
Lets hope in heaven they have player advantage roulette
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 10:04 AM 2015
who told u that u ll go into heaven? there is and hell aswell.... :smile:
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 10:07 AM 2015
Quote from: petespin on Oct 01, 10:04 AM 2015
who told u that u ll go into heaven? there is and hell aswell.... :smile:

Yea well. I dont believe in that

I believe when we die our consiousness decides where it wants to go. Bashar my friend, bashar
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 10:17 AM 2015
there is just one thing to point out ,becoz here its big discussion ,and for something very serious for our lives , well rg like the millions out there u re wrong about what life and death is , and remember there is only ONE truth ,reality, try and find out it , unfortunatelly from when u  and all the others go to school u start learn incorrect things,about how life can be , anyway never is too late to satrt looking for the truth .
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 10:22 AM 2015
Quote from: petespin on Oct 01, 10:17 AM 2015
there is just one thing to point out ,becoz here its big discussion ,and for something very serious for our lives , well rg like the millions out there u re wrong about what life and death is , and remember there is only ONE truth ,reality, try and find out it , unfortunatelly from when u  and all the others go to school u start learn incorrect things,about how life can be , anyway never is too late to satrt looking for the truth .

How do you or anyone for that matter claim to KNOW 100 percent? You cant. Impossible

Science is now finding out paralel realities and universes exist....think about that

I hope if thats true rouletteghost in parallel reality is making millions
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 10:26 AM 2015
i suggest u not to mention  about parrarel universe and all these , and try to find the evdence if what science ,religion, claim are true or not ,the time is up...
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 10:28 AM 2015
Quote from: petespin on Oct 01, 10:26 AM 2015
i suggest u not to mention  about parrarel universe and all these , and try to find the evdence if what science ,religion, claim are true or not ,the time is up...

Science can prove parallel universes it cannot prove heaven. Thats where im coming from.
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 10:42 AM 2015
ok lets talk about what science says about my favor theme, time travel , i cant remeber her name ,she is physicist, well she said that ther is something [ a superior force?] that dont allowed to travel in time , now u ll say that are all theories , but and pararell universes its nothing more than a theory, probably there are other dimensions unknown to us till now  , but not pararel realitities ....
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 10:51 AM 2015
Quote from: petespin on Oct 01, 10:42 AM 2015
ok lets talk about what science says about my favor theme, time travel , i cant remeber her name ,she is physicist, well she said that ther is something [ a superior force?] that dont allowed to travel in time , now u ll say that are all theories , but and pararell universes its nothing more than a theory, probably there are other dimensions unknown to us till now  , but not pararel realitities ....

Who knows. As a race we r young and we dont know anything. So much we cant understand yet.

Anyway this is too off topic. Should be moved to off topic section
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: denzie on Oct 01, 11:00 AM 2015
Better answer my question ^^
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: petespin on Oct 01, 11:01 AM 2015
yeah its like another american physicist said that we are like the ants that live under a highways bridge ,they[ants] can never  climbe on the top of the bridge , he is so right .....comparing the endless universe with our small planet!!
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 11:03 AM 2015
Quote from: denzie on Oct 01, 11:00 AM 2015
Better answer my question ^^
?
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: denzie on Oct 01, 11:04 AM 2015
Quote from: denzie on Sep 30, 03:14 PM 2015
Nope, that will bust. Never use 1000u to win 1u.
Another question : if one of the ec is 42%( 42/3/55)... and we start flatbet the 42 side....what's gonna happen you think? Let's take RNG too...much faster

This one
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 01, 11:09 AM 2015
Quote from: denzie on Oct 01, 11:04 AM 2015
This one

I dont know. Math says your balance should go up
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: denzie on Oct 01, 11:11 AM 2015
 ;)
Title: Re: The theoretical question.
Post by: Turner on Oct 01, 11:22 AM 2015
RG is right
Set up a seperate topic on time travel. I would gladly contribute. It doesnt belong here