****8 on 1****

[Johnlegend]

JL, quick question in play

I will list out a few results, in dozen format, and need you to clarifie something plz


13231 ok first Trigger but can you use the last 1 as the first one in the next block, like this

132312231 Is this two Triggers ? or do you only use the highlighted number 1 once ?

thanks for your help 

Yes Twister that is valid. I've had treble triggers that string together one after the other. I've seen as many as four 4 Gaps like that

[Twisteruk]

Yes Twister that is valid. I've had treble triggers that string together one after the other. I've seen as many as four 4 Gaps like that

Thats great to read. I wasnt sure so I wasnt playing them just incase

So if you were playing 3 Triggers it could look like this ?

1223133212321333 now bet against dozen 1

[Twisteruk]

Yes Atlantis this is correct. Hey its good to have you and Twister back on my thread. 20 months ago our dream team created the Matrix concept. That led to interelated thoughts outside of a matrix. And is to some degree responsible for the ideas of late. With FIVE and now 8 ON 1...

Yes I agree 

[Johnlegend]

that's great to read. I wasn't sure so I wasn't playing them just incase

So if you were playing 3 Triggers it could look like this ?

1223133212321333 now bet against dozen 1

That's correct Twister.

[superman]

Attached 8 on 1 versus the 10,300 BVNZ real money spins I have on file, using JLs' original rules

EDIT:

173 - W  Prog 1 Cash 1 Peak 0 BetAgainst (dc)

spin number - W/L Progression, Bank, Peak reached, obvious!

[ashwinsinha]

hey i read in comments this takes hell of a spin to get the triggers man.... i only play live dealer and it is about 1 spin every minute 

[Twisteruk]

.

[Twisteruk]

hey i read in comments this takes hell of a spin to get the triggers man.... I only play live dealer and it is about 1 spin every minute 

You would have to play it as a side bet not ure main bet as 60 spins an hour is sloooooooooow !

[Skakus]

Attached 8 on 1 versus the 10,300 BVNZ real money spins I have on file, using JLs' original rules

EDIT:

173 - W  Prog 1 Cash 1 Peak 0 BetAgainst (dc)

spin number - W/L Progression, Bank, Peak reached, obvious!

So after 10,209 spins you are up 153 units and 1 single loss will cost 242 units? 

And to achieve this you had to move the rng 9993 times without a bet on the dozens? 

This would mean if putting 1c on the zero to move the rng or alternatively playing another game to move the rng and if you're lucky lose at a rate of -2.7% x 9993 = -269 units? 



Oh dear, not for me thanks. 




This youtube video accurately sums up "8 on 1" for me... count them, I think there's 8 knights...


Holy Grail - Killer Bunny

[Twisteruk]

JL, tried the zero wheel but its too expensive. I lost 1 Unit getting to my bet trigger though I did get it back by bettin slightly more and winning

Im now +6 Units all wins have come on the first bet

Im gonna go back to the No Zero wheel as its free to move the rng there

At least this way we can compare ure results to the NZ wheel 

[Turner]

So after 10,209 spins you are up 153 units and 1 single loss will cost 242 units? 

And to achieve this you had to move the rng 9993 times without a bet on the dozens? 

This would mean if putting 1c on the zero to move the rng or alternatively playing another game to move the rng and if you're lucky lose at a rate of -2.7% x 9993 = -269 units? 



Oh dear, not for me thanks. 




This youtube video accurately sums up "8 on 1" for me...


Holy Grail - Killer Bunny

i must admit...unless Ive gravely misunderstood this.....im with Skakus...and declare this a kind of madness. Totally removed from what gambling and roulette is about

[Johnlegend]

JL, tried the zero wheel but its too expensive. I lost 1 Unit getting to my bet trigger though I did get it back by bettin slightly more and winning

I'm now +6 Units all wins have come on the first bet

I'm gonna go back to the No Zero wheel as its free to move the rng there

At least this way we can compare your results to the NZ wheel 

That's good Twister, you are well and truly back. I like it when you are in this frame of mind. It livens up the forum and gets things moving. Yes we shall compare. I expect big things from 8 ON 1.

[Johnlegend]

So after 10,209 spins you are up 153 units and 1 single loss will cost 242 units? 

And to achieve this you had to move the rng 9993 times without a bet on the dozens? 

This would mean if putting 1c on the zero to move the rng or alternatively playing another game to move the rng and if you're lucky lose at a rate of -2.7% x 9993 = -269 units? 



Oh dear, not for me thanks. 




This youtube video accurately sums up "8 on 1" for me... count them, I think there's 8 knights...


Holy Grail - Killer Bunny

Skakus, if your thinking is that 8 ON 1 can't be for you because its too slow. You now realise why 99.9% of the human race think this game is unbeatable. A grail like method can't be rushed. I've been trying to get that across for over two years on this forum. Methods that are close to unbeatable exist. 8 ON 1 is one of them. But the price random asks of you is extreme PATIENCE. I once read you saying, when you were doing the challenge alongside me on Bayes RNG. I wish I had a method like JL that never lost.

Yet when once such method is handed to you on a plate you brush it off. Because its not some speedy gonzales intstant gold dropper. Its not going to be for most, I already know that. But when one day I've taken BV to breaking point. You won't have to ask me what I used, just keep that in mind.

[Johnlegend]

i must admit...unless I've gravely misunderstood this.....I'm with Skakus...and declare this a kind of madness. Totally removed from what gambling and roulette is about

In other words Turner you don't like winning. I would rather wait to win, than rush to lose. that's my motto. And time will show how that works. You want fast methods you have them by the truck load. But theyll never be unbreakable, not even close.

[Skakus]

>>> speedy gonzales intstant gold dropper!

LOL! Thanks for the name JL. Can I have dibs on it for my next system?