****8 on 1****

[Johnlegend]

I've found it so hard to get a Treble Trigger I just play with Two Triggers

Exactly, I've done this too, betting against there being 7. Honestly people played in short bursts this thing will go a long time without loss. If Superman can only find one loss on an unofficial RNG in 32,000 spins. COME ON what do you people want?
.

[Twisteruk]

And just to put that in context ALL my 19 Wins have come from playing 2 Triggers

IF I had been playing 3 I still would never of had a bet as ALL wins have been on the FIRST BET !

[Twisteruk]

Latest Update +24pts Playing 2 Triggers

All 24 Bets Won First Time

[superman]

You are saying 3 dozens all produced TREBLE TRIGGERS simultaneously??

Nope, I'm saying 2 have at the same time not all 3. You may of not had this yet but you may at some point so I/we need to know what to do when it occurs.

[Johnlegend]

Nope, I'm saying 2 have at the same time not all 3. You may of not had this yet but you may at some point so I/we need to know what to do when it occurs.

A VOID Superman, we cannot entertain twin qualifiers. As we are using one progression at a time. So in the rare instance this occurs we let it go.

[Johnlegend]

Latest Update +24pts Playing 2 Triggers

All 24 Bets Won First Time

Twister that is a phenomenon in itself. 24 wins on the first bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just finished my first real session at BV in over a week. And I am back on track moving in the right direction again. I had 3 games of 8 on 1, Using double triggers. I won two on the first bet and one on the second bet. I also had 3 games of Five with the same result. BV single zero just can't string many of these 4 GAPS together. Played in short bursts. Its scary to think how far 8 ON 1 could go before it even catches SEVEN 4 GAPS.

[ignatus]

Sorry for my bad english, but I don't understand your explanation? Can you please explain so I can understand? Just wait for a dozen not being hit for 4 times then start betting or what? What is a "trigger" ? I don't get it at all. This system is old? Wait for a dozen not being hit for 7 times then start betting etc, i read it before?

[superman]

A VOID Superman. we cannot entertain twin qualifiers

So cancel both, would you not run with one of them, 1st to start etc? you would have to as you wouldn't know the next one was coming, so what you are saying is

DA whatever
DB 3,4,1,1,4
DC 4,3,2,4,4

C is ready to be bet on but as B has started to produce triggers you would ignore C now? but at what point would you scratch either, if one already had a 4 gap and then another had a 4 gap, scratch there or if one has 2 4 gaps and another starts?

[Johnlegend]

Sorry for my bad English, but I don't understand your explanation? Can you please explain so I can understand? Just wait for a dozen not being hit for 4 times then start betting or what? What is a "trigger" ? I don't get it at all. This system is old? Wait for a dozen not being hit for 7 times then start betting etc, i read it before?

The thinking might be old Ignatus. The possibilities are very enticing. Look below at the example of what would trigger a bet. In its strictest form we go after 3 consecutive 4 GAPS. Lately I have been going after 2. Because random is struggling so hard to even put three of these together. Although scrutinizing static results and trackers. Shows EIGHT consecutive 4 GAPS and beyond could occur. The reality is that the vast majority of the time, 6 is the best it can do. I am now 345/0 with 8 ON 1. Having never been taken beyond FIVE CONSECUTIVE 4 GAPS. Live or BV single zero.

DOZEN 2
04
03
03
04
04-----BET TRIGGER
02
01
04? ?We now oppose this by betting on DOZEN 1 and DOZEN 3

[Johnlegend]

So cancel both, would you not run with one of them, 1st to start etc? you would have to as you wouldn't know the next one was coming, so what you are saying is

DA whatever
DB 3,4,1,1,4
DC 4,3,2,4,4

C is ready to be bet on but as B has started to produce triggers you would ignore C now? but at what point would you scratch either, if one already had a 4 gap and then another had a 4 gap, scratch there or if one has 2 4 gaps and another starts?

Okay im with you now Superman. In that scenario, we go and stay with the first to qualify. Ive had this once.

[Twisteruk]

Okay I'm with you now Superman. In that scenario, we go and stay with the first to qualify. I've had this once.

That was my thinking also 

[Twisteruk]

Twister that is a phenomenon in itself. 24 wins on the first bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I just finished my first real session at BV in over a week. And I am back on track moving in the right direction again. I had 3 games of 8 on 1, Using double triggers. I won two on the first bet and one on the second bet. I also had 3 games of Five with the same result. BV single zero just can't string many of these 4 GAPS together. Played in short bursts. Its scary to think how far 8 ON 1 could go before it even catches SEVEN 4 GAPS.

Im happy with it 

The amazin thing is IF I had been playin with 3 Triggers I still would NOT of even had a Bet !!

[Johnlegend]

I'm happy with it 

The amazin thing is IF I had been playing with 3 Triggers I still would NOT of even had a Bet !!

This is the reality of short burst play Twister. I truly believe played in that fashion you could go YEARS before you run into that nasty 8 or even 7. Im known for getting excited about the methods I believe in. But im telling everyone straight. This is one to seriously get over the top about. forget the 242 units risk. The time involved. Do you want to really win or not?? Thats the only question that matters. Ive seen guys blow 2 grand on methods that were always going to lose. And thats why if you find something this powerful at 1/8 of that risk. You should give it a serious look.

I know there will be members on this forum who will not even do that. And 3 years from now theyll still be crying about house edge and how we cant overcome it. This will definately be the last method I place on any forum. Im done now. The only thing left is for the openminded to get it on. And the sceptics to sneer at me, but at the same time. Watch what happens on BV over the next 3 years.

[Twisteruk]

This is the reality of short burst play Twister. I truly believe played in that fashion you could go YEARS before you run into that nasty 8 or even 7. I'm known for getting excited about the methods I believe in. But I'm telling everyone straight. This is one to seriously get over the top about. forget the 242 units risk. The time involved. Do you want to really win or not?? that's the only question that matters. I've seen guys blow 2 grand on methods that were always going to lose. And that's why if you find something this powerful at 1/8 of that risk. You should give it a serious look.

I know there will be members on this forum who will not even do that. And 3 years from now theyll still be crying about house edge and how we can't overcome it. This will definately be the last method I place on any forum. I'm done now. The only thing left is for the openminded to get it on. And the sceptics to sneer at me, but at the same time. Watch what happens on BV over the next 3 years.

Well I tend to agree 

Im not playing any other Method just this as I find this suits me fine and its not as slow as ppl make out
I find a Unit comes every 3 or 4 minutes when you put BV on auto spin. You have to pay attention but I like that 

[atlantis]

 

I'm with twister and JL all the way. Don't pass this up - it has great potential.

A.