• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

****8 on 1****

Started by Johnlegend, Oct 20, 09:17 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Robeenhuut

Quote from: Skakus on Oct 28, 05:42 PM 2012

Yes, 8 on 1 made it through the two 32000 spins files but there were only 251 bets placed ovwe 170 games through the whole 62,669 logged spins (which is still a decent result).

But that averages out to 1 bet every 250 spins, which is way off your average of 1 bet every 60-80 spins (I noticed this anomally was glazed over by all proponents).

So I’m pretty sure superman’s bot is not playing the game properly (sorry Neal) and if that’s true then the test result is void. Pity.

Ask Twister how often he gets a bet, I’ll wager it’s a lot less than once every 250 spins.

I suspected superman's test was flawed and questioned it in reply 169, then also asked for your verification in post 178 but was completely ignored. Oh well, well and truly swept under the carpet now.  ;D

Yeah. The results are flawed. There are some games that take less than 20 spins ;D


Matt

superman

QuoteSo I’m pretty sure superman’s bot is not playing the game properly (sorry Neal) and if that’s true then the test result is void. Pity

Possible, but I don't know why, as far as I can tell it does what it's supposed to do, I also wonder how they were getting much more bets in shorter spin frames.

BUT Danny, if you would like to crunch some stats, if you get the txt file for the BVNZ 10300 spins and then go to the start of this thread where I posted a gap file and check those gaps against the BVNZ results to see if it did actually bet at the correct time, you will only need to do 1 or 2, maybe 3 bets, I don't have the time or inclination currently, but that would tell you if the bot was wrong I think.

EDIT: the gap post may be on the ***** FIVE ***** thread
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Twisteruk

 Update:

Games played 180

Games Won 180

+180pts
   
Its Set In Stone =)

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Oct 29, 03:48 PM 2012
Update:

Games played 180

Games Won 180

+180pts
   
Nice work Twister I'm 400/0 now. Had one step 4 bet today live. It held.

donik7777

Hello John!
How many did you win in 1, 2, and 3 steps?
Best regards.

donik7777

John why you dont use other gaps f.e. 5,6,7,8 GAPs
or in 4 gaps some majic?

Johnlegend

Quote from: donik7777 on Oct 30, 10:24 PM 2012
John why you don't use other gaps f.e. 5,6,7,8 GAPs
or in 4 gaps some majic?
Its possible Donik7777 but people complain this is too slow. That would be even slower. Although this is something where a bot would come in useful. Because I don't have the data for confidence. But 7 or 8 times 6 seems unlikely too.

More interesting would be to see how 2 and 3 GAPS hold up. That would greatly speed turnover. But I have no documented data. With THE ZONE I started recording from 4. That's why I saw what never happened in my results easily. Although its only recently I realized it could be a strong method in itself when proofing FIVE.

Twisteruk

Update:

Games played 202

Games Won 202

+202pts
Its Set In Stone =)

Turner

Quote from: Twisteruk on Oct 31, 06:35 AM 2012
Update:

Games played 202

Games Won 202

+202pts
Just out of interest Twist, can u put 202 wins into  "spins" and "hours at the table/screen". Ballpark guestimate is fine.
Cheers mate
Turner

Twisteruk

No idea mate

I did start keepin spin info at the start but stopped and my days play is broken into so many pieces ive no idea how much time has passed lol

Suffice to say it can take 20 spins for a bet and sometimes 80 or 90 but that is not so slow as am on BVNZ turbo spins
Its Set In Stone =)

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Oct 31, 06:35 AM 2012
Update:

Games played 202

Games Won 202

+202pts
Nice work Twister you are slowly catching up with me I'm now 410/0 Haven't been past step.3 for a while now. What you are doing is really impressing me. After someone reported seeing an 11 on BVNZ. I thought you wouldn't even make 150 wins. Keep going maybe a few others will realize a method to beat random, doesn't have to look like a degree in math.

kevint3

Twister--

Are you playing this within ***Five**** or strictly 8 on 1??

Good work by the way

Twisteruk

Quote from: kevint3 on Oct 31, 07:07 PM 2012
Twister--

Are you playing this within ***Five**** or strictly 8 on 1??

Good work by the way

Just 8 on 1  :thumbsup:
Its Set In Stone =)

Twisteruk

Update:

Games played 232

Games Won 232

+232pts
Its Set In Stone =)

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Nov 01, 11:28 AM 2012
Update:

Games played 232

Games Won 232

+232pts
Great work Twister. I never thought you could do this on BVNZ. What progression are you using, a 4 step against seeing six 4 GAPS. Or a 5 step against seeing 7 4 GAPS. If you make 500 I will play BVNZ next year. I like the idea of free spins. Again great stuff, you've really taken to this one Twister.


-