Should the member 'Ignatus' be given his own section?

[ddarko]

One thing I've learnt (God knows if it's true or not) is NOTHING is ever "due"

[marvin]

agree with turner and iggiv, his post lacks radical ideas and originality.


ignatus, big favor please... kindly put all your ideas in notepad or testing zone.
thanks!

[ignatus]

agree with turner and iggiv, his post lacks radical ideas and originality.


ignatus, big favor please... kindly put all your ideas in notepad or testing zone.
thanks!

Lack originality and radical ideas ey??? I *try* to keep my bad temper here, but wtf are you talking about?? ALL my strategies are in one way or another getting an advantage, the betselection and progression, all this combined, you say I lack "originality and radical ideas" ?? please man, stfu with your complaining. I say this again: -come up with something better yourself before complaining and thinking you're such a wiseass. Thank you.

[ignatus]

link:://blog.commlabindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/those-who-try-and-fail-300x300.jpg

[iggiv]

link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif

[ignatus]

link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif

haha.. xD

[Ralph]

link:://oedaday.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/rake.gif

Rake, house advantages, commissions takes more than we usually think. Turnover your bankroll many times it is eaten.


Backing banker in baccarat using negative progression, can end with a "net" which is less than the bank fee.


1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128  You won one unit and pay 6 in commissions.

[marvin]

Lack originality and radical ideas ey??? I *try* to keep my bad temper here, but wtf are you talking about?? ALL my strategies are in one way or another getting an advantage, the betselection and progression, all this combined, you say I lack "originality and radical ideas" ?? please man, stfu with your complaining. I say this again: -come up with something better yourself before complaining and thinking you're such a wiseass. Thank you.

YES! and i will say it again, IGNATUS' strategies lacks radical ideas and oribinality for it to merit a new section. you didnt listen and read old threads. oh and i already did come up something you. and it jus shows that you arent reading again

[TwoCatSam]

Hey Marv

Ever since this has been going on, I've been wondering about that pesky apostrophe!

I see you put it at the end of the "s", as in "Ignatus'".  I was thinking it would be "Ignatus's".  Thanks for clearing it up.

Sam

[Ralph]

Hey Marv

Ever since this has been going on, I've been wondering about that pesky apostrophe!

I see you put it at the end of the "s", as in "Ignatus'".  I was thinking it would be "Ignatus's".  Thanks for clearing it up.

Sam

The name is from Latin, in English I think it is OK to spell Ignatus' in his native language it is Ignatus as well, but it should be proper Ignati.

[Proofreaders2000]

Perhaps not his own section, but a 'Blog' thread maybe?

[Ralph]

Perhaps not his own section, but a 'Blog' thread maybe?

Yes! A very smart proposal!

[TwoCatSam]

Yes, a blog.  He could blogivate!!

[Chrisbis]

If U were describing an item that belongs to Ignatus, then that item would be said to be "Ignatus's" item.


Its HIS item..not a plural of the item, (or a number of people called Ignatus)

Like all those Ideas he has had recently...........they are all Ignatus's ideas..................and long may he sail in them..........

[Turner]

Yes, a blog.  He could blogivate!!

You are on form at the moment Samster.....Im still laughing at writing reminders on your fat belly and the wife making you take a shower.