(link:s://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/459264092679573504/5zYBsrj9_400x400.jpeg)
Thanks Willie for you dozen way...
I took the first 3 pages of zumma, about 125 spins....just to see how far the gaps were between the uniques
to see if columns were different then dozens
ONLY BETTING WHEN PREVIOUS 2 WERE UNIQUE
parentheses show where we hit a unique
Little bored tonight
Results: MAX LOSS in a row was 12, happened once. other then that the average was about 3 or 4 losses in a row after a trigger before a win. not bad for a 12 number bet
if a 12 in a row loss happens one time every 125 spins (which i do not think it does, further testing will determine) then a progression can combat that, 12 numbers is not a bad prog
L = column 1
M = column 2
R = column 3
L
R
L BET-LOSE
(M) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
R NB
(L) BET-WIN
R BET-LOSE
R BET-LOSE
R NB
R NB
R NB
R NB
R NB
M NB
R BET-LOSE
(L) BET-WIN
R BET-LOSE
(M) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
M NB
L NB
L BET-LOSE
M NB
(R) BET-WIN
R BET-LOSE
R NB
L NB
(M) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
R NB
(L) BET-WIN
(M) BET-WIN
(R) BET-WIN
0 BET-LOSE
L NB
M NB
M BET-LOSE
M NB
M NB
R NB
(L) BET-WIN
(M) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
L NB
(R) BET-WIN
R BET-LOSE
L NB
(M) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
R NB
M BET-LOSE
M BET-LOSE
M NB
M NB
R NB
R BET-LOSE
R NB
M NB
(L) BET-WIN
0 BET-LOSE
L NB
R NB
R BET-LOSE
R NB
M NB
R BET-LOSE
M BET-LOSE
M BET-LOSE
L NB
L BET-LOSE
L NB
M NB
L BET-LOSE
L BET-LOSE
R NB
L BET-LOSE
0 BET-LOSE
R NB
L NB
R BET-LOSE
L BET-LOSE
(M) BET-WIN
(R) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
(L) BET-WIN
(R) BET-WIN
L BET-LOSE
(M) BET-WIN
M BET-LOSE
L NB
(R) BET-WIN
L BET-LOSE
L BET-LOSE
L NB
R NB
L BET-LOSE
L BET-LOSE
L NB
R NB
R BET-LOSE
R NB
L NB
(M) BET-WIN
L BET-LOSE
L BET-LOSE
L NB
0 NB
M NB
M NB
L NB
M BET-LOSE
0 BET-LOSE
L NB
R NB
(M) BET-WIN
R BET-LOSE
M BET-LOSE
0 BET-LOSE
M NB
R NB
R BET-LOSE
R NB
M NB
(L) BET-WIN
outcome: I like this
Hey RG, I saw ken is attacking you too. Perhaps remind him not long ago he confided in me he wasn't doing well with roulette and wanted to buy a roulette computer. Meanwhile to everyone he acted like "top dogg" with his killer "method". In fact from what I know, he seems to have a gambling problem. Like I said before, he attacks people's strategies, but has nothing himself. He wants you to die so badly in a car crash (his own words). Now that's a guy with problems.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Oct 27, 08:49 PM 2016
outcome: I like this
Yes, I agree. Looks promising -- thanks for posting this.
Hi Rich
The 12 numbers are a static bet, (3 columns of static #'s) now 125 spins is short data set, but good enough to see if you could Hit and run as some like to call it.
Now would 12 random #'s behave any differently to 12 static #'s ?
Like your data set is tiny, so is the average document for Jackpot247.com, 300 games of watching how the non-hit, hit over, if possible 60 spins or more, i do not have control on the spins as its shown on TV, as the shows are of varying lengths, but of 293 recorded games, betting for the remaining 12 unique, non-hit, (0x), it has a max of 16 spins.
So is 16 L's going to show in the static 12 #'s ?
Quote from: Steve on Oct 27, 10:24 PM 2016
Hey RG, I saw ken is attacking you too. Perhaps remind him not long ago he confided in me he wasn't doing well with roulette and wanted to buy a roulette computer. Meanwhile to everyone he acted like "top dogg" with his killer "method". In fact from what I know, he seems to have a gambling problem. Like I said before, he attacks people's strategies, but has nothing himself. He wants you to die so badly in a car crash (his own words). Now that's a guy with problems.
What he is doing there now is for his own self gratification. Sigh.
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Oct 28, 12:22 AM 2016
Yes, I agree. Looks promising -- thanks for posting this.
Thanks
I will work on tweaking it
Proper (dirty word) - triggers
Quote from: nottophammer on Oct 28, 12:35 AM 2016
Hi Rich
The 12 numbers are a static bet, (3 columns of static #'s) now 125 spins is short data set, but good enough to see if you could Hit and run as some like to call it.
Now would 12 random #'s behave any differently to 12 static #'s ?
Like your data set is tiny, so is the average document for Jackpot247.com, 300 games of watching how the non-hit, hit over, if possible 60 spins or more, i do not have control on the spins as its shown on TV, as the shows are of varying lengths, but of 293 recorded games, betting for the remaining 12 unique, non-hit, (0x), it has a max of 16 spins.
So is 16 L's going to show in the static 12 #'s ?
Hmmmm. This is not static. Only when previous 2 are unique
12 numbers in my opinion will behave differently then a doz or col on the layout depending on wheel layout
On the american wheel the columns are layed out in chunks they behave different
I know its not static i was just trying to show how 12 random against 12 static could go. You already had 12, when will or if go 16?
Its like Grandpaa way betting 9 #'s on the mat, it is a static 9 and ive seen 9 on the mat misss for 34 spins where as betting for the last 9 non-hit only take 23 to date.
Its like that old dozen bet posted by a programmer when 1 of the doz's miss in 5 spins now bet for that doz to hit, again any 12 on the mat, doz/col has you in a set position on the wheel, me i'd rather get to the last 12 of the 37 non-hit and then go for that.
out of that 300 games on J247, betting to the 12th spin for the remaining 12 non-hit has won 292 out of 294 games, just betting 6 times has won 89.45% of the 294 games, just an obseravtion, good luck