Operation "ELEMINATION WITH PROFIT"

[VIP]

Ok here is the strategy that I engineered after the GLCs topic.
Itââ,¬â,,¢s a little difficult to explain it but I will do my best.

We are starting by betting 1 chip on an EC. (the strategy in on the ECs)
If we win we are starting again with the same(because we are +)
If we lose we are writing on our paper 1 and and the next bet is 2 .
If we win we starting again with 1 chip(because we are +)

Now lets look some losing stakes to see what this strategy is all about.

We bet 1 ââ,¬Â¦.lost
We have on the paper    : 1
We bet 2ââ,¬Â¦.we lost
We have on the paper    :  1,2
Our next bet will be again 2 because with our win we want to overcome the 1sr loss by1 chip.
So it will be like this : 1,2,2,
BUT when we have on the paper 4 losses we will then add the 2 first losses 1+2=3 so we will bet next 4 chips (because we want to eliminate the 2 losses but also make a profit from this elimination)

So it will be like this on the paper if we will lose the 4 chips bet spin:  
1,2,2,2,4    
Lest say that we won in the next spin so we delete the first 2 losses and we have this now:

2,2,4

Now we have 3 lossesââ,¬Â¦so the next bet will be 3 chipsââ,¬Â¦because we want to win 1 chip and eliminate (delete) the 1st lossââ,¬Â¦.

And it goes like thisââ,¬Â¦Ã¢â,¬Â¦

The rule is that when we have1-4 losses we bet the  1st loss(always to the left on the paper) and we add 1 more chip for the profit.
when we have 5-8 losses we add the first 2  losses and we add 1 more chip for the profit.
when we have 9-12 losses we add the first 3 losses and we add 1 more chip for the profit.

With this way we will not only win more chips from our wins according to the losses BUT we will have an advantage position when the Losses will be more then the Winsââ,¬Â¦..

The table of how many losses to add is :
LOSES:
1,2,3,4      = 1st   loss +1 chip
5,6,7,8      = 2    1st losses +1 chip
9,10,11,12= 3    1st losses +1 chip
Keep in mind that after eliminating 2 losses or 3 lossesââ,¬Â¦the losses will be less so we may have to move up in the ââ,¬Å"losses tableââ,¬Â
Thatââ,¬â,,¢s it.
If you like test it .

[Jointu]

Interesting mate,

A nice approach.   

I could contribute with the even bet selection.   
I recommend to play Red or Black in this way: "Bet last color that came".   

The only thing that will make you have more loses than winnings is when we have RBRBRBRB- basically on each spin a change o color.   

[VIP]

Thank you for the compliment BUT bet selections does NOT exist.

Bet Last decision
Bet decision before last
Bet  dis sision before Christmas..............Its all the same.

In 1 session the last decision may go Super...in an other one can ruin you...same is for all the decisions....decision before Winter or Summer or anything....

In every spin an EC has 50/50 to hit (excluding 0)

[Jointu]

True,
but in my opinion RNG or roulette is generating numbers and not colors.

And from my experience, it is unlikely to have each spin a change of color.

Also, with your system you need to keep the paper loses as low as possible ( these is done by having winnings); in other case you will bet higher amounts on 50/50 chances and lose your BR fast.

[superman]

And from my experience, it is unlikely to have each spin a change of color.

It's called a chop scenario, personally I have seen 26 chops, this did however include 3 zeros, but still its 23 alternating colours.

Be careful out there

[Jointu]

I agree.

And here it should come human intuition and stop until the storm passes.

Okey,

Now; in order to work we should have a good EB selection.

What do you recommend?

Thank's.

[VIP]

"""And here it should come human intuition and stop until the storm passes. """

My friend we do NOT know when the storm will come and when the storm will pass....this is 1 more of the reasons why there are no good or bad bet selections.

You are very new in roulette research and this is why you post those primary things...

I have posted a nice strategy here and it is a shame to have the Topic filled with things that doesn't make any sense....

so please no more imaginary bet selections fantasies here....if there will be any more I will just have to delete them...

Ps. Keep in mind that IF there were good bet selections we would NEVER need to have a progression....flat bet would be enough...

Thanks

[Jointu]

Okey VIP

I apologize.
No intention on that "outcome ".

Sorry again.

[VIP]

You are a nice guy...

[catalyst]

hi vip
bet selection is important in streamlining the losses. your system is indeed a interesting one. but without bet selection, we will be dumb donkey or duck from devonshire poultry.
i am testing it seems promising with DBL.
any contribution fron anyone? Hermes, buffalo, twisteruk-the great mind?
thanks
catalyst

[GLC]

VIP,

I like your bet method.  How come I never saw this topic before.  It's like it just appeared out of thin air and it was already a month old.

I keep trying to prove you wrong by trying as many different selection methods as I can.  So far your statement stands true that there's no such thing as bet selection improving your chances of winning.

Sometimes I think I have a real jewel because I'm doing very well with it and then, wake up call.  Just the sequence that kills it comes up with a vengeance.

I'm going to test your system and see if I can find an effective way to play it.

Cheers,

George

[catalyst]

hi glc
i think you need to rethink about your statement in bet selection. in my test, i found observing the pattern and changing bet selection from DBL to FTL according to pattern could make this system profitable. otherwise would be felt gravitational pull into blackhole. even 'VIP' would not be spared.
thanks

[GLC]

Hi glc
i think you need to rethink about your statement in bet selection. in my test, I found observing the pattern and changing bet selection from DBL to FTL according to pattern could make this system profitable. otherwise would be felt gravitational pull into blackhole. even 'VIP' would not be spared.
thanks

catalyst my friend.  I have tested this stuff until I'm blue in the face.  My favorite method of betting is just as you described.  The problem is no matter when you decide to switch from DBL to FTL and vice versa there are plenty of times when as soon as you switch, the sequences change also and you end up chasing the pattern.  You can easily lose 6-10 bets in a row.  Not often, but then how often do 6-10 colors show in a row?

Having said that, I still prefer the method you suggested over pick one color or the other.  I'm just not sure in the long run DBL/FTL wins more than pick-a-color.

Cheers

[catalyst]

hi GLC
in my test, i found DBL is better than the FTL if you dont want to change the bet selection. only in the case of doubles you need to be careful. doubles are event horizon near blackhole, you will fill gravitational pull.
thanks
catalyst