• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

DNA OF ROULETTE SYSTEM: Your opinions, please

Started by esoito, Sep 11, 07:52 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

malcop

Quote from: Nickmsi on Feb 01, 03:13 PM 2012
Thanks for the help . . . I think I am getting it.

Per attached, would you be betting on Dozen A & C?

Would you also be betting on Columns K & L?

Thanks . .  Nick
Yes based of what I can see your next bet would be AC & KL but because I can't see method C3 not 100% sure.


Look what is happening here is the three methods for DNA are being tracked at the same time by the software, based on the method that is performing well emerges as your potential selection.


All I call say is I'm doing well and Don is doing well, but then again you may try it and not do so well, so the more people that at least give it a fair trial and that means more than just a couple of trial sessions the better, I have been using Racetrack for nearly a month now, the key is how we are now using the information produced by the software that was the final breakthrough for Don and myself how we interpreted and used the date provided.


And we hope it works the same way for others also.


Thanks


Malcop

GARNabby

Quote from: Bayes on Feb 01, 12:44 PM 2012
You can find the pattern which generates consecutive losses by...
That should be the least-likely "killer sequence".  (I think Gizimoto was right the first time around.)

Bayes

Yes it's only the ECs which will give you a unique losing pattern. In the case of dozens/columns there is more than one killer sequence, but they are all equally likely. I admit I haven't studied this system in any depth.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

malcop

Hi All,


It's been quite a few months since we heard anything from Don, in fact I thought he had giving up on "DNA of Roulette", since February I have emailed Don to see if there was any update, but never received any reply, and then yesterday this email popped up in my inbox.

===================================

Dear Philip,

Dulan and I were hard at research throughout the year and we uploaded the best ever system just now. Please try it out and comment. The returns are the best we have achieved so far.

Best Regards

Don

==================================================


I have played a few sessions to see what has changed and quite a bit has, totally new software, I am not sure how the bets are being made, Don says it is explained in the manuals, but I'm not so sure would prefer some examples of a demo session or two.

I have only played around 4 sessions and have had sessions go as high as +44 and my last one of +70, even taking out sessions where the software tells you to reset I'm up +72 units, this of course is not a conclusive test.


Link to the software:
link:://:.neworiginalthinking.com/dna-of-roulette.html
The software to use is link:://:.neworiginalthinking.com/arc/rail/railtrack.html


This other email has some useful information:
====================================

It is so nice to hear from you. This is the best ever system we have developed so far and this time we decided to only provide a user guide without the system logic. If you refer to the user guide it will clearly give instructions on how to operate the system.

You need a minimum of 12 - 14 past records to operate the system. The system thereafter checks every spin and issues wagering instructions or throws a SHIFT command. When you press the shift button, it will roll the past outcomes by one position and then the system will check for the eligibility condition. Upon a wagering criteria is being met, the system will continue to direct and issue a RESET command, that terminates the session. Upon being instructed to RESET, enter the spin record number on the white box in between the SHIFT and RESET buttons and press the RESET button. It will start directing the next session. The number of chips required varies from 2 - 8. We will upload the visually guided version by this Sunday.

This time we have made it driven by a Joy Stick!
Best Regards

Don

===========================================

Please remember this is a tool, if you find yourself up say +40 don't go throwing it away trying to get a few more units and losing it all, for example one session I was up +40 and I thought I would push it, it went down to -1 back up to +19 then when it dropped back down to +10 I ended the session.

This new versions is not all flat-betting as before, you could be placing 1, 2 or 4 units on either Dozens or Columns.If you want to try this out play with the smallest stacks you can, and only increase your unit value, if you have confidence in this new version of DNA (I should not have to say this but I have)
Any questions just ask and I will try and answer them.

Thanks

malcop


marivo

I think its better then previous versions....or am I just lucky? Any way those 2 guys are persistent! :)

malcop

Quote from: marivo on Dec 05, 05:39 PM 2012
I think its better then previous versions....or am I just lucky? Any way those 2 guys are persistent! :)
Yes I think it is better than previous versions also, and maybe I was just lucky  :)


And yes they are persistent, having not heard from them for so long I thought they had given up on the idea.



GLC

Don, 

I, for one, am very glad to see that you didn't give up on this project.  You couldn't have a more solid supporter than Malcop.  I know that some of the members in the past have been a little harsh, but you have weathered the criticisms in a professional manner.  I hope we can be a more civil forum now than in the past.  Let each who wish to test your system come to their own conclusions as to it's effectiveness without feeling the need for personal attacks.

I have not been one of the faithful testers of your system because in the past I didn't appreciate the power of betting on dozens.  That has changed.  I have been gradually shifting from even chance bets to dozen bets over the last year.

I will, as time allows, test your system, if I can get up to speed on it and I think I can with Malcop's help.  I don't expect to win every time, but if your system stays ahead of losses enough to justify the time investment, that's all we can ask for.

Hoping for the best,
GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

vundarosa

Quote from: malcop on Dec 05, 06:47 PM 2012
Yes I think it is better than previous versions also, and maybe I was just lucky  :)


And yes they are persistent, having not heard from them for so long I thought they had given up on the idea.

----------------

Hi malcop, how's testing going on this one?

vundarosa

GLC

Sorry, I haven't been able to test this.  My computer died on me and I hate to work on the internet through my I-phone. :'( :'(
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

iggiv


malcop

Quote from: iggiv on Dec 19, 12:13 AM 2012
my opinion is that this is BS
iggiv,


You are entitled to your opinion, thank you for your valued input.


Thanks


malcop

malcop

Quote from: vundarosa on Dec 18, 08:32 PM 2012

----------------

Hi malcop, how's testing going on this one?

vundarosa
Hi Vundarosa,


Since my last post, Don has been busy trying to refine DNA of roulette, so those trying this out will have seen those changes, such as:


1) Visual indication of where to place your bets.
2) Visual indication of where to place inside numbers, if you so wish.(I'm keeping an eye on this new feature, so far it looks very interesting!)
3) The software telling you what you should be doing, such as HOLD, Wager, Reset, Shift.


I have not had much time to fully test this out, due to work commitments etc.  but what I have seen  dose not make me feel this is a total waste of time, like most systems it can at time seem like a grind, losing two or three sessions in a row of -9 to -15, then followed but one or two winning sessions with +20 or more, which recovers your losses and puts you ahead for the overall session.


Until I can uses this system at length which I hope to over the xmas period I can't give this the thumbs up, but as long as the winning sessions overall compensate for the losing ones then I will be happy.


Thanks


malcop

GLC

Quote from: iggiv on Dec 19, 12:13 AM 2012
my opinion is that this is BS

Iggiv,  Is your opinion based on actual testing or are all systems BS? 

If not, can you tell us which ones you consider worth playing?

I too am short of time and if you can help us cut to the chase, we'll all be endebted.

GLC
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

iggiv

GLC, as long as i can see a talk about "law of the third" and outside bets, i think this is BS.

Law of the third may work on single numbers, not on outside bets. I have even doubts about using it with streets and corners. But with columns and dozens? forget it.

I hope i answered your question without beating around the bush.


(also when they talk about the law of the third, they have to say something about hit-n-run, because it won't work otherwise)

that's my opinion. U guys can have yours and believe that such things can work.

jackoram

Paris is a starting point of this game. In the roulettergame player can choose variety of betting. In this game you will choose your number and when you get your number in playing condition then you will win.

-