Tight LW-Registry Even Money

[ego]

Hello

I test random agains't random.
Pick six random outcomes (could be any lenght)

Then i wait for one outcome to show.
If it is same as the first result of the random six i play oppisite.
If is is oppisite as the first result of the random six i play same.

Progression 1 1 1 2 3

WWLLWWWLLWLWLWLWWWWWLLWWLWWWLWLLWWWWLWWWLLWLWWWWWWLWW

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 Did not have to bet higher then 1

Todays random org file:

Code Select Expand


2
2
2
1
2
2

2
1 W

1
1
1
1
1
2

2
1 W

2
2
1
1
1
1

1
1 L
2 L
1 W

2
1
1
2
2
2

1
1 W

1
2
2
1
2
2

2
2 W

2
1
2
1
2
2

1
2 L
1 L
1 W

1
2
1
1
1
2

2
1 L
1 W

1
1
2
1
1
2

1
1 L
1 W

2
1
2
2
1
2

1
2 L
2 W

2
2
1
1
1
1

1
2 W

1
2
1
2
2
2

1
1 W

2
1
2
1
2
1

1
1 W

1
2
1
1
2
1

2
2 W

1
1
2
2
2
2

1
1 L
2 L
1 W

2
1
1
1
2
1

1
1 W

2
2
2
1
2
2

2
2 L
1 W

2
2
2
1
1
1

1
2 W

1
1
1
2
1
1

2
1 W

1
1
2
2
2
1

1
1 L
1 W

2
2
1
1
2
1

1
1 L
2 L
1 W

2
2
1
2
2
2

2
1 W

1
2
1
2
1
1

2
2 W

1
1
2
2
1
1

2
1 W

1
1
1
2
2
2

1
1 L
2 W

1
1
2
2
2
2

1
2 W

2
2
1
1
1
2

2
1 W

1
2
2
1
2
2

1
2 L
2 L
2 W

2
1
2
1
1
1

2
1 L
1 W

1
1
2
2
2
2

2
1 W

1
1
2
1
1
1

1
2 W

2
2
2
2
1
2

2
1 W

2
2
1
2
1
2

1
2 W

2
2
2
2
1
2

1
2 W

1
2
1
1
1
1

2
1 L
1 W

2
1
1
2
1
1

1
1 W

2
1




[buffalowizard]

Ego

So for example, if i was using Red and Blacks and my 6 random outcomes were:

R R B R B B

then the next outcome is the same as the first -

R

Do I now bet against the other 5?

Just a bit confused , please do a brief sample cheers

[ego]

Ego

So for example, if i was using Red and Blacks and my 6 random outcomes were:

R R B R B B

then the next outcome is the same as the first -

R

Do I now bet against the other 5?

Just a bit confused , please do a brief sample cheers

Yes and i will explain.

If you have R R B R B B then if next outcome is R then it start out to be the same pattern, thats why you bet oppisite.
If you have B then the pattern start to become oppisite and you bet same.

Just a way to reduce.

Cheers

[roulettefan]

2
2
1
1
1
1

1
1 L
2 L
1 W
hey patrick
can you please explain the second and third bet

have you make other test with this methodology

have you got the same results ?

[Tomla021]

I tested this and it did give a very tight LW  registry which is awesome because Losses in a Row kill ya  LIAR ---this I will test further
thanks

[TwoCatSam]

It IS loses in a row that kill ol' TwoCat.  Wins in a row never bothered me much.

[Dutchy]

Hi Ego,
          In the example given by roulettefan you lose the first two bets and win the third.If you are using the progression you give, you would be down 1 unit and moving on to the next 6 digit sequence.The progression was 1-1-1-2-3.I like the tight w-l ratio.

[hanshuckebein]

I tested this and it did give a very tight LW  registry which is awesome because Losses in a Row kill ya

I guess it depends on the progression someone is using. there are progressions where those "evil in between wins" do much more harm to the bankroll than a longer string of losses does. 

[Tomla021]

did it with 3 instead of 6----kinda fun

[Dutchy]

Tomla,
         I tried your idea using 3 on 3 baccarat shoes.I used a 1-2 progression because it lines up perfectly.I played 6 deck bac,it won all three shoes.+3,+2,+3.
                           
                                             16 first bet wins
                                             10 second bet wins
                                              6  outs
                                             32 total bets           

[Tomla021]

will check more  shoes bacc is my game

[probasah]

Yes and i will explain.

If you have R R B R B B then if next outcome is R then it start out to be the same pattern, thats why you bet oppisite.
If you have B then the pattern start to become opposite and you bet same.

Just a way to reduce.

Cheers

Hey ego,

This looks like an interesting method. Do you change the outcomes every time? (lets say after you get a win).
You say that you play with this progression  1 1 1 2 3
That means your attacks are 5 so therefore the sequence is of 6. Am i right?

Regards,
Alex

[probasah]

Let me give you an example.Random.org

2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2

So lets get this thing rolling.

2
1
1
2
1
1  --- first 6 numbers sequence 2 1 1 2 1 1 ...wait for a 2 (trigger) than bet from there the OPPOSITE of  11211 (i.e 22122 ) with the progression 1 1 1 2 3

2  Trigger! start betting 2 2 1 2 2 with the progression 1 1 1 2 3
1 L -1 (progression 1)
1 L -2 (progression 1)
1 W -1 (progression 1)
2 W +1 (progression 2) ---------------+1 progression ends here on a +1, next  6 outcomes will be our sequence

2
2
1
2
1
1     next 6 numbers sequence 2 2 1 2 1 1  ...wait for a 2 (trigger) than bet from there the OPPOSITE of  2 1 2 1 1 (i.e 1 2 1 2 2 ) with the progression 1 1 1 2 3

1 no bet
1 no bet
1 no bet
1 no bet
1 no bet
1 no bet
1 no bet
2 Trigger! Start betting  bet from there the OPPOSITE of  2 1 2 1 1 (i.e 1 2 1 2 2 ) with the progression 1 1 1 2 3
1 W +1 (progression 1) +1 RESET

2
2
2
2
2
2  NEXT 6 outcomes 2 2 2 2 2 2 will be our next sequence, repeat the steps as above....

2
1
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
2


Please let me know if that is what you mean with this method.

Regards,
ALex

[ewarwoowar]

Are we using the same generated 6 values against every session of 6 outcomes, or a different 6 against every different 6?

[TwoCatSam]

1  --- first 6 numbers sequence 2 1 1 2 1 1 ...wait for a 2 (trigger) than bet from there the OPPOSITE of  11211 (i.e 22122 ) with the progression 1 1 1 2 3


Probash

That's not the way I read it.  Refer to original post:

Then i wait for one outcome to show.
If it is same as the first result of the random six i play oppisite.
If is is oppisite as the first result of the random six i play same.


Sam