#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => General Discussion => Topic started by: kingmaq on Oct 02, 08:06 AM 2017

Title: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 02, 08:06 AM 2017
Hi guys

I have a system (betting on 25 numbers )
I have tested the system against a huge database and found out that it does lose up to max 7 in row.

Now I am facing a dilemma, should i wait for a trigger say 3 losses and then bet ?

Or should I bet every bet and stop at first loss ( So that i can exploit the winnings ).

If I decide to bet every bet untill a loss occurs, then I should figure out how to recover or better say how to resume the play.

Please advice
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 02, 08:29 AM 2017
Hi, i find 25 numbers to many numbers to bet on , but if i would bet ...then...
Wait one virtual W, and bet until first L...so on..over and over again, go for W streaks
Progression Leveller 1,2,4,8 stay on top until new high, or use same leveller but rise
bets only after W.
Cheers
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 02, 09:06 AM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 02, 08:29 AM 2017
Hi, i find 25 numbers to many numbers to bet on , but if i would bet ...then...
Wait one virtual W, and bet until first L...so on..over and over again, go for W streaks
Progression Leveller 1,2,4,8 stay on top until new high, or use same leveller but rise
bets only after W.
Cheers

Thx but being sure that only 7 loss can occur in a row, wouldn't it be better waiting for 3 L and then bet ?
I know the time is the problem but at least one can achieve consistent profit.

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: DoctorSudoku on Oct 02, 10:56 AM 2017
Quote from: kingmaq on Oct 02, 09:06 AM 2017
Thx but being sure that only 7 loss can occur in a row, wouldn't it be better waiting for 3 L and then bet ?
I know the time is the problem but at least one can achieve consistent profit.

The following may seem like a snarky comment on my part, but trust me when I say that I am making it in all seriousness:

Nowadays I  am increasingly reluctant to use the term "consistent profit" in conjunction with anything roulette-related.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: vladir on Oct 02, 11:08 AM 2017
And then there is that extreme case where it goes to 8 losses. Yes, it will happen whatever the system you playing :P
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 02, 03:41 PM 2017
Guys,

here are some tests (150 Live spins) ... max 3 L
and yes it does win flat bet!!!

    ID        NUM
------ ----------
     1         17
     2         18
     3          3  L
     4          0  W
     5         14  L
     6         31  W
     7          6  W
     8          4  W
     9         21  L
    10          4  W
    11         27  W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    12         25  W
    13          6  W
    14          1  W
    15          0  W
    16          8  L
    17         35  L
    18         17  W
    19         16  L
    20         31  W
    21          8  W
    22         24  L
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    23         13  L
    24          2  W
    25          1  L
    26          1  W
    27          6  L
    28         32  W
    29         12  W
    30         17  W
    31         22  L
    32          7  W
    33         18  W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    34         34 L
    35         30 W
    36         30 W
    37         25 W
    38         33 L
    39          2 L
    40          2 W
    41         28 L
    42          1 L
    43         14 W
    44         15 W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    45         18 L
    46         12 W
    47         31 W
    48         13 W
    49          4 W
    50          8 W
    51         25 L
    52         18 L
    53         31 W
    54         14 W
    55         25 W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    56         14 W
    57         10 W
    58         27 L
    59          2 W
    60          6 W
    61         23 L
    62          7 L
    63         34 W
    64          2 W
    65          8 W
    66         15 W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    67         27 W
    68         29 W
    69         17 W
    70         32 W
    71         10 W
    72         32 W
    73         21 W
    74          7 L
    75          9 W
    76          9 W
    77         28 W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    78         22 W
    79         15 L
    80          1 L
    81         26 W
    82          8 L
    83         17 W
    84         15 W
    85          7 W
    86         25 W
    87         34 W
    88         31 W
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
    89          9 W
    90         19 W
    91         36 W
    92         22 W
    93         31 W
    94         23 L
    95         15 W
    96         31 W
    97         27 W
    98          7 W
    99         23 L
                 
    ID        NUM
------ ----------
   100         19 W
                 
     ID        NUM
------- ----------
    101          8 L
    102         13 W
    103         29 W
    104          3 L
    105          2 W
    106         15 W
    107         14 W
    108         30 L
    109          4 W
    110         14 W
    111         25 W
                 
     ID        NUM
------- ----------
    112         35 W
    113         11 W
    114          2 W
    115         32 L
    116         34 W
    117          6 L
    118         17 W
    119         32 L
    120          9 W
    121         20 L
    122          5 W
                 
     ID        NUM
------- ----------
    123         29 W
    124         34 W
    125         35 W
    126         19 W
    127         24 W
    128         24 L
    129         25 L
    130         35 L
    131          7 W
    132          0 W
    133         33 W
                 
     ID        NUM
------- ----------
    134          4 L
    135         19 W
    136         16 W
    137         35 W
    138         27 W
    139         33 W
    140         15 W
    141         27 W
    142         19 W
    143         33 L
    144          2 L
                 
     ID        NUM
------- ----------
    145         16 L
    146          1 W
    147         10 W
    148         10 W
    149          4 W
    150         35 W

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 02, 03:49 PM 2017
Quote from: vladir on Oct 02, 11:08 AM 2017
And then there is that extreme case where it goes to 8 losses. Yes, it will happen whatever the system you playing :P

That can happen...everything can happen.
well, losing 1000 or 2000 won't hurt you much when you are +5000 at the end of the day.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 02, 05:25 PM 2017
more tests..

5  W
7  W
26 L
35 W
12 W
16 L
10 W
27 W
22 W
11 W
28 L
5  W
6  W
4  W
17 L
23 W
20 W
12 W
26 L
26 W
16 W
31 W
8  W
7  W
4  W
21 W
16 W
3  L
33 L
6  W
15 W
3  W
16 W
1  W
33 W
8  W
22 L
3  W
11 L
13 W
10 L
31 W
24 L
27 W
5  W
31 W
22 W
11 W
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 07:51 AM 2017
more tests..

30 L
12 W
24 W
27 W
7  L
16 W
27 W
23 L
35 W
9  L
19 W
14 W
26 W
28 W
14 W
0  W
25 W
18 L
0  W
16 W
8  L
34 W
11 W
31 W
6  L
20 W
18 W
2  W
24 L
13 L
36 W
32 W
3  W
25 W
16 L
10 W
31 W
15 W
5  W
14 W
13 W
4  L
8  W
18 W
4  W
29 W
10 W
24 W
22 W
9  L
11 L
1  L
4  W
35 W
9  L
24 W
33 L
25 L
14 W
4  W
8  W
13 L
16 W
20 W
9  W
36 W
0  W
9  L
30 W
1  W
18 W
14 L
8  W
15 W
7  W
33 L
28 W
25 W
10 L
11 W
0  W
34 L
32 W
16 W
35 L
12 W
28 W
29 L
34 L
25 L
28 W
2  W
32 L
11 L
30 L
27 W
24 L
28 L
34 W
23 L
26 W
12 W
0  W
18 W

20 L
9  W
30 W
8  W
24 W
36 L
4  L
36 W
2  L
31 W
36 W
15 W
26 W
25 W
16 L
10 W
6  W
12 W
36 W
0  W
26 L
6  W
10 L
30 L
35 W
3  W
36 W
2  W
21 W
33 W
10 L
27 W
2  L
3  W
23 W
21 W
7  W
36 L
22 L
17 W
9  W
23 L
16 L
36 W
6  W
30 L
16 W
12 W
15 W
35 L
25 W
31 L
31 W
12 W
25 L
8  L
25 L
36 W
19 L
36 L
27 W
23 W
34 W
24 W
22 W
20 W
33 W
32 L
13 W
32 W
1  W
5  L
20 W
6  W
13 L
15 W
24 W
21 L
11 W
10 W
12 W
8  L
25 W
27 W
4  L
16 W
8  W
16 W
9  W
8  W
5  W
26 W
4  L
5  W
27 L
7  L
2  W
34 W
30 L
30 L
21 W
22 L
32 W
10 W
32 W
27 W
34 W
23 W
10 W
31 L
1  W
6  L
29 L
27 W
21 W
10 L
22 W
5  L
16 L
9  W
32 L
28 W
23 W
26 W
2  L
28 L
9  L
4  W
3  W
2  W
13 W
21 W
16 W
29 L
8  L
24 L
15 W
15 L
17 W
28 W
18 L
33 W
9  W
35 W
0  W
33 W
0  W
1  L
16 W
26 W
10 W
19 L
29 W
26 W
1  L
7  W
33 L
27 L
26 W
32 W
28 W
35 W
18 L
32 L
21 W
36 W
6  W
31 W
29 W
1  L
15 L
25 W
1  W
35 W
10 L
20 L
4  W
3  L
8  W
14 W
4  W
7  W
22 W
13 W
12 W
26 W
15 W
11 L
31 W
24 W
2  W
33 W
11 W
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 03, 08:11 AM 2017
Quote from: kingmaq on Oct 02, 08:06 AM 2017
Hi guys

I have a system (betting on 25 numbers )
I have tested the system against a huge database and found out that it does lose up to max 7 in row.

Now I am facing a dilemma, should i wait for a trigger say 3 losses and then bet ?

Or should I bet every bet and stop at first loss ( So that i can exploit the winnings ).

If I decide to bet every bet untill a loss occurs, then I should figure out how to recover or better say how to resume the play.

Please advice
King how are the 25#'s picked
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: denzie on Oct 03, 08:16 AM 2017
25? I'm guessing you bet on 0 ?

Since you didn't answered my question yet...I'll try again here...

What's the difference in betting 2 dozens/columns vs 24 random inside straight  bets ? (Forget limits)
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 08:17 AM 2017
Quote from: nottophammer on Oct 03, 08:11 AM 2017
King how are the 25#'s picked

here the point, first of all none of the 25 numbers  are being picked randomly... so we let the randomness aside.
100k spins from one particular live wheel have been gathered and saved in a database.
I take the last two numbers to predict which sector of the wheel the next number is going to land on... once i locate the sector (12 numbers) i select it and then cover the two sides with 12 numbers 6 on every side and i cover the zero with 1 chip.

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 08:21 AM 2017
Quote from: denzie on Oct 03, 08:16 AM 2017
25? I'm guessing you bet on 0 ?

Since you didn't answered my question yet...I'll try again here...

What's the difference in betting 2 dozens/columns vs 24 random inside straight  bets ? (Forget limits)

Mate, the roulette can be exploited with physics + statitiscs.
your 24 numbers are not aligned in one  or two sector... no advantage in such a selection.
my 25 numbers represent one candidate sector plus 6 additional neighbour on every side plus the 0.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 08:43 AM 2017
a new test for 100 spins from live wheel :  max 4 L occured...



15 W
1  L
19 W
25 W
14 W
30 W
19 W
15 W
7  L
32 W
3  W
29 W
13 L
11 L
24 W
35 W
15 W
12 W
22 L
24 W
12 W
15 L
35 W
32 W
29 W
36 L
6  W
4  W
24 W
27 W
3  L
5  W
27 W
21 W
3  W
33 L
30 W
10 W
29 W
1  L
15 L
1  L
26 L
25 W
7  W
32 W
27 L
9  L
12 W
23 L
1  W
29 L
7  W
18 W
30 W
12 L
14 W
6  W
36 L
15 L
19 L
0  W
9  L
22 W
17 L
8  L
1  W
6  W
1  L
13 W
18 W
1  W
7  W
2  W
14 W
26 W
17 L
19 W
20 L
33 W
28 L
7  L
16 L
27 W
23 L
34 W
32 L
8  W
28 L
36 W
2  W
26 W
2  W
8  L
23 L
18 W
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: denzie on Oct 03, 08:46 AM 2017
Well obviously the answer was... There isnt any difference.

Unless you have accuracy of predictions.... But only IF you have that.

So you based your research on 100k spins from 1 wheel. So you gonna play only that wheel ?
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 08:54 AM 2017
Quote from: denzie on Oct 03, 08:46 AM 2017So you based your research on 100k spins. From 1 wheel or multiple wheels?

Mate, why you insisting that there's no difference! and yes it's all about accurate prediction..so why you contradict yourself.
how can you get accurate prediction based on the table layout... it's nonsense the table layout is made for the casino and not for us!

The data are from one particular wheel... the wheel where magic can happen.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: denzie on Oct 03, 08:59 AM 2017
Don't get me twisted.  Just was curious about your answer.  ;)

I couldn't care less about table layout. It's only there coz we can't place our chips on the wheel (for me).

Anyway best of luck for you.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 09:08 AM 2017
Quote from: denzie on Oct 03, 08:59 AM 2017Anyway best of luck for you.  :thumbsup:
Quote from: denzie on Oct 03, 08:59 AM 2017
Don't get me twisted.  Just was curious about your answer.  ;)

I couldn't care less about table layout. It's only there coz we can't place our chips on the wheel (for me).

Anyway best of luck for you.  :thumbsup:

why can't you place ships on the wheel?
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: denzie on Oct 03, 09:23 AM 2017
Quote from: kingmaq on Oct 03, 09:08 AM 2017
why can't you place ships on the wheel?

They keep falling when they spin it. Very annoying.  :lol:

Steve...This is in your alley. Go for it
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 09:33 AM 2017
My biggest problem is the progression... and that's the dilemma!
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 03, 09:39 AM 2017
King the 1st 60 spins from your live spins betting 25#'s avg to hit in 2 spins


(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/10/03/temp_827169.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/7lag)
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 09:47 AM 2017
Quote from: nottophammer on Oct 03, 09:39 AM 2017
King the 1st 60 spins from your live spins betting 25#'s avg to hit in 2 spins


(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/10/03/temp_827169.png) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/7lag)

Yes exactly!
this happen almost with some dealers who spin the ball consistenly with the same speed.
another thing i am sure about, the system has never yet failed with more than 4 L in a row... still the progression a big concern
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: denzie on Oct 03, 09:47 AM 2017
Quote from: kingmaq on Oct 03, 09:33 AM 2017
My biggest problem is the progression... and that's the dilemma!

There's the problem. Betting 25 numbers and progression. I'm afraid it's to much. I hope I'm wrong but ....I'm out  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 10:03 AM 2017
Quote from: denzie on Oct 03, 09:47 AM 2017
There's the problem. Betting 25 numbers and progression. I'm afraid it's to much. I hope I'm wrong but ....I'm out  :thumbsup:

I know that very well, that's why i am very careful with the progression.
there are two ways to approfit from this system:

Way1- bet every spin, stop at first Loss ... I don't know what the hell I'm gonna do next to recover.
Way2- wait for a trigger (2 or 3 L) and bet up to 4 Marti up.

Advantage/Disatvantage of Way1:
Quick and steady wins, less waiting BUT need to recover after first L!

Advantage/Disatvantage of Way2:
Less Risk BUT long waits and low profit
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 03, 04:51 PM 2017
I am now sure that only Luck can make you win in roulette, and there is no holy grail in roulette, there is holy shiiiiit instead.
i have seen tonight streak of loses 9 times L... unbelievable!

i wasted my time.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 03, 05:15 PM 2017
Quote from: kingmaq on Oct 03, 04:51 PM 2017
I am now sure that only Luck can make you win in roulette, and there is no holy grail in roulette, there is holy shiiiiit instead.
i have seen tonight streak of loses 9 times L... unbelievable!

i wasted my time.
Not really, you now know betting a random 25#'s, not the remaining 25 from the starting 37#'s gets caught. But now you've seen it miss 9 you need to redesign your method. Seen the remaining 25 miss for 6 spins and thats happened 3 times in 628 games
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 03:55 AM 2017
I told you better go for W streaks, chase the Ls is bad idea. Try that way i told you.
If you are lucky and not hit often LWLWLW... ., then you can win many times.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: denzie on Oct 04, 04:01 AM 2017
Or stop betting 25 numbers. Seriously! !!
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 05:43 AM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 03:55 AM 2017
I told you better go for W streaks, chase the Ls is bad idea. Try that way i told you.
If you are lucky and not hit often LWLWLW... ., then you can win many times.

Ok I want to take your advice, mate !
Can you tell me how do I resume the game after the first L I encounter ?

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 05:44 AM 2017
Quote from: denzie on Oct 04, 04:01 AM 2017
Or stop betting 25 numbers. Seriously! !!

Yeah!

what other strategy do you suggest ?
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 04, 07:27 AM 2017
King
over time like old Mr J says you learn whats shite. So lets upset a few forget outside bets. Just work with your starting 37 #'s, they all have to come, you need to find how.
So find each non-hits avg to hit, then the max they can take, never seen the remaining 25 take more than 6 spins, they avg to hit in 2, so if you see miss for 2 then there over due, so now consideration is given to the known max, like Winkel says if unsure dont bet.

Now i've just comeback from blood test stopped off in betfred, 20 minuets +40 units just watching my starting 37 #'s
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 07:42 AM 2017
Ok, here short example LW


L
L
W virtual, start, bet 1u
W, bet 1u
W, bet 1u
L. Stop
L virtual
L virt
W virt, bet 2u
W , bet 2 u
L stop
W virt, bet 4u
W bet 4 u
W bet 1u, so reset
W bet 1u
L stop
L virt
L virt
Lvirt
L virt
W virt, bet 1u
W bet 1u
L stop
W virt, bet 2u
L stop
W virt, bet 4u
L stop
W virt, bet 8u
W bet 8u
W bet 4 or 8u
W bet 1u reset
W bet 1u
L stop
W virt, bet 2u
W bet 2 u
W bet 1u
Lstop
...so on...

Your enemy with this Lw strategy is
this sequence LWLWLWL......
IRise bets only after virt W, and after real W
hopping that will catch W streak. Reset to
1u when new high or when close to your
last high, no strict rules, you decide

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 04, 08:00 AM 2017
King as Kats posted, heres the game from betfred(link:://:.pichost.org/images/2017/10/04/temp_645404.jpg) (link:://:.pichost.org/image/791f)

Remember up to 19th non-hit they avg to hit in 2 spins
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: nottophammer on Oct 04, 08:06 AM 2017
King even Den's hotties wins
1st 10 the 76% #9 repeat, now bet all R1's me with 2 units not 5 #1, now bet all R2's #13
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 08:10 AM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 07:42 AM 2017
Ok, here short example LW


L
L
W virtual, start, bet 1u
W, bet 1u
W, bet 1u
L. Stop
L virtual
L virt
W virt, bet 2u
W , bet 2 u
L stop
W virt, bet 4u
W bet 4 u
W bet 1u, so reset
W bet 1u
L stop
L virt
L virt
Lvirt
L virt
W virt, bet 1u
W bet 1u
L stop
W virt, bet 2u
L stop
W virt, bet 4u
L stop
W virt, bet 8u
W bet 8u
W bet 4 or 8u
W bet 1u reset
W bet 1u
L stop
W virt, bet 2u
W bet 2 u
W bet 1u
Lstop
...so on...

Your enemy with this Lw strategy is
this sequence LWLWLWL......
IRise bets only after virt W, and after real W
hopping that will catch W streak. Reset to
1u when new high or when close to your
last high, no strict rules, you decide

Cool, but why should i increase bet after W?
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 02:24 PM 2017
Because when you will have bad runs  will need a recovery plan, your decide
what to use negative progression after Ls, or possitive progression after W.
If you look at LW sequences , for sure will see more Ws than Ls.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 02:29 PM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 02:24 PM 2017
Because when you will have bad runs  will need a recovery plan, your decide
what to use negative progression after Ls, or possitive progression after W.
If you look at LW sequences , for sure will see more Ws than Ls.

Thx, how would you progress with such outcomes?


  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ko
   ko
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok











Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 03:21 PM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 02:24 PM 2017
Because when you will have bad runs  will need a recovery plan, your decide
what to use negative progression after Ls, or possitive progression after W.
If you look at LW sequences , for sure will see more Ws than Ls.

but raising your stake AFTER a win means you're more likely to lose any gain in the next spin. Anyone who has played positive progressions knows this.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: maestro on Oct 04, 03:24 PM 2017
QuoteThx, how would you progress with such outcomes?


  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ko
  ok
  ok
  ok
  ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ko
   ko
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok





like that...

blah
blah
blah
blah
fuck off
off fuck
get a life
life will get you
give up
stamp colecting
:xd: :xd: :xd: :xd: :xd:
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 03:25 PM 2017
There is an innovated technique called  "SQUARE ROOT Staking System"...
Basically, you increase you increase your stake after a WIN by the Square Root of your Profit, and you go back to your Basic stake after a Loss.

further Information found below in the URL link:://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/staking-plans/stakes/

what do you think about this?
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 03:35 PM 2017
  ok = W
  ko = L
  v= virtual
  r = real

Can use 1,2,4,8  ( 16, 32  optional)

  L/W      bet unit size

  ok  v        1u
  ko  r         stop
  ok  v        2u
  ko  r         stop
  ko  v               
  ok  v        4u         
  ok  r         4u           
  ok  r         1u, reset
  ko  r         stop
  ko  v
  ok  v         2u
  ok  r         2u
  ko  r         stop
  ok  v        4u
  ok  r         4u
  ok  r         4u
  ok  r         1u, reset
  ko  r         stop
  ok  v         2u
  ok  r         2u
  ok  r         1u, reset
  ok  r         1u
  ok  r         1u
  ko  r         stop
  ok  v         2u
  ok  r         2u
  ok  r         1u, reset
  ok  r         1u
  ok  r         1u
  ok  r         1u
  ok  r         1u
  ok  r         1u
  ok  r         1u
  ko  r         stop
  ok  v         2u
  ok  r          2u
  ko  r         stop
  ok  v         4u
  ok  r          4u
  ok  r          4u
  ok  r          1u, reset
  ok  r          1u
  ko  r          stop
  ok  v          2u
  ko  r          stop
  ok  v          4u
  ok  r          4u
  ko  r          stop
  ok  v          8u
  ko  r          stop
  ok  v          8u
  ko  r          stop ( bad run   >:D    )
  ok  v          16u   (can use 8u )
  ok  r           16u
  ok  r           16u
  ok  r           16u
   ok  r          1u, reset
   ok  r          1u
   ok  r          1u
   ok  r          1u
   ok  r          1u
   ok  r          1u
   ko  r         stop
   ok  v          2u
   ok  r           2u
   ok  r           1u,reset
   ko.....so on.....
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ko
   ko
   ko
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ok
   ko
   ok
   ok
   ok

Be ready sometimes for sessions from hell, use stop lose .
I still belive you bet to many numbers ( 25) , you must look at something
with less numbers / max 12 numbers to bet .

cheers

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 03:42 PM 2017
Quote from: kingmaq on Oct 04, 03:21 PM 2017
but raising your stake AFTER a win means you're more likely to lose any gain in the next spin. Anyone who has played positive progressions knows this.

You can  lose/win  with both, negative or possitive progression, more
IMPORTANT is the bet selection......
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 04:14 PM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 03:42 PM 2017
You can  lose/win  with both, negative or possitive progression, more
IMPORTANT is the bet selection......


Kattila... all Progressions lead to hell...
I tweaked the system and added some improvements so that flat bet became profitable.. below is test over 500 spins>


  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  L
  W
  L
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W 
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W 
  W
  W
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  L
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W 
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  W
  L
  L
  W
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  L
  L
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  L
  W
  L
  W
  L
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W 
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W 
  W
  W
  W
  W
  L
  W
  L
  W
  W
  W




W  369 
L  136

Profit= 4059 - 3400 =  659

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 04:32 PM 2017
Then go and make some cash.
You know 500 spins are nothing, try to simulate for long run.
I have systems that can survive flat bet  for xxx xxx spins.
The idea behind that LW strategys i posted is that one can try to
avoid some bad runs , the progression (or flat bet) is your choise.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 04:39 PM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 04:32 PM 2017
Then go and make some cash.
You know 500 spins are nothing, try to simulate for long run.
I have systems that can survive flat bet  for xxx xxx spins.
The idea behind that LW strategys i posted is that one can try to
avoid some bad runs , the progression (or flat bet) is your choise.

I totally agree with you, need further tests... but keep in mind flatbet requires a relative big Bankroll.
according to you how much tests are required to prove the correct functioning of a system?

Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 05:04 PM 2017
Many players will say need to test millions of spins .
I say at least 50 000 .......100 000 spins, we have only one life....
Let s say your first ( **longterm ** 50 000 ) test finish in positive (happy   ;D ) , the next (s)
sessions can end in negative,   sad but true (  :(  ). Same can happen with 500 000 spins  sessions.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 05:08 PM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 05:04 PM 2017
Many players will say need to test millions of spins .
I say at least 50 000 .......100 000 spins, we have only one life....
Let s say your first ( **longterm ** 50 000 ) test finish in positive (happy   ;D ) , the next (s)
sessions can end in negative,   sad but true (  :(  ). Same can happen with 500 000 spins  sessions.

Ok, but should we test against the whole 50k  spins ? or per chunk? ...
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 05:08 PM 2017

Ok, but should we test against the whole 50k  spins ? or per chunk? ...
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: Kattila on Oct 04, 05:16 PM 2017
It s the same ....whole 50k , or 10+10+10+10+10, or any other division.
Title: Re: Roulette's dilemma
Post by: kingmaq on Oct 04, 05:18 PM 2017
Quote from: Kattila on Oct 04, 05:16 PM 2017It s the same ....whole 50k , or 10+10+10+10+10, or any other division.

No it is not the same!  The outcome might differ...