Below are my three last Lw registries for a system I am testing. It is a 2/1 bet and I have been playing +1 on a loss/-1 on a win. This seems to be working alright but can become a bit of a grind, especially if a run of lwlwlw hits. I aim for 20 units won a session, 3 or 4 sessions a day (playing .50u so that is £10 a session)
As you can see there aren't any more than 2 losses in a row in the last three games (the most I have seen so far has been 3, but of course I know that could change anytime!) so would you use a more aggressive progression - maybe even the dreaded 1 3 9!? If three losses hit then maybe wait for a virtual win then use a recovery progression?
Or, as there are often at least 2 wins in a row then maybe a positive progression?
Anyway, just hoping for some advice/opinions on what might be a better MM with results like these and suggestions for a good progression (are you there GLC!? ;) )
Cheers
Roughy
Game 1: wlwwlwl:l::: - Good game!
Game 2: lwl::wllwwlwwl:l:
Game 3: wwlwwlwl:llwlwllwwl:wllwwllwwl:wlwl:l:l:wl:wlwlwwl:ww - a grind!
For a two dozen progression, how about up two/dozen on a loss
with a penthouse of six units per dozen & less one unit per dozen on a win?
(my two cents :) )
Is your bet 2-1 (single dozen) or 1-2 (two dozens)?
Big difference..
Hi maybe you try the Leveller for 2 Doz ,but with some LW rules....
see this by Hermes and Balint.
link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=16916.msg119899#msg119899 (link:://vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=16916.msg119899#msg119899)
--When you have a proved evenly balanced method of about 350 spins,and your aim
shouldn't be more then 20 units....then I suggest 2 up on a los 1 down on a win.
Thanks for the quick responses Guys :)
I had thought about the +2 on a loss, -1 on a win too so I'll test that and the Leveller and see which works best.
Sorry Sam, I thought 2-1 was used to signify a two dozen bet i.e. bet 2 units, win 1, hence 2/1
Cheers
Roughy
It's all good!