-
Now Brett Morton claims he wins four out of five session on regular basis.
One among hes method is to use a specific money management strategy that limit him from a sloppy and fuzzy game plan - the engine room.
To understand this topic you have to read the following two topics.
Topic 1
link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10151.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10151.0)
Topic 2
link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3760.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3760.0)
Now how is that possible winning four session out of five - i have no clue - but i am pretty good with even money bets - so i will give it a try - testing various of selections.
He even say that hes favorite staking plan is parlay - that is hard and cruel.
Because i find it being one of the most difficult staking plan to succeed with.
The challenge is to apply Brett Morton's money management strategy and using the staking plan parlay with is recommendation of bet selection.
He recommend to start to attack after a series of six.
Details ...
Brett Morton bet against the previous formation of six using a line flat betting for four attempts.
1 1 1 1
Now if he hit then he will follow the wheel and parlay hes way up to hes win target.
It is fuzzy and there exist no other explanation what i can remember.
So this mean he attack series of six not to become ten in a row - if i loss then only down 4 units.
That is a good sign.
But there exist ways to modify hes strategy's - as playing after a win and save 4 units - but that is a later question - first i will test and see if i can get half of hes claims to work out.
Well more to come ...
Now i pick today's random file from random org 2012 09 03
Will just let the parlay run with no money management strategy as i first want to see peaks and drawdowns to understand the variance or strike ratio ...
Three session during 300 trails.
Session 1.
W 1 +1
L 2 -1
W 1 +0
L 2 -2
W 1 -1
L 2 -3
L 1 -4
W 1 -3
W 2 -1
W 3 +2
W 4 +6
W 5 +11
W 6 +17
W 7 +24
W 8 +32
W 9 +41
L 10 +31
W 9 +40
L 10 +30
W 9 +39
L 10 +29
W 9 +38
W 10 +48
L 11 +37
W 10 +47
W 11 +58
L 12 +46
L 11 +35
W 10 +45
L 11 +34
L 10 +24
W 9 +33
W 10 +43
L 11 +32
L 10 +22
L 9 +13
L 8 +5
Session 2.
L 1 -1
L 1 -2
W 1 -1
W 2 +1
L 3 -2
W 2 +0
W 3 +3
L 4 -1
L 3 -4
W 2 -2
L 3 -5
W 2 -3
L 3 -6
W 2 -4
W 3 -1
W 4 +3
L 5 -2
W 4 +2
W 5 +7
L 6 +1
L 5 -4
W 4 +0
L 5 -5
W 4 -1
W 5 +4
W 6 +10
L 7 +3
W 6 +9
W 7 +16
L 8 +8
L 7 +1
W 6 +7
W 7 +14
W 8 +22
W 9 +31
W 10 +41
L 11 +30
L 10 +20
W 9 +29
W 10 +39
W 11 +50
W 12 +62
W 13 +75
W 14 +89
W 15 +104
L 16 +98
W 15 +113
L 16 +97
L 15 +82
L 14 +78
L 13 +65
Session 3.
W 1 +1
L 2 -1
L 1 -2
W 1 -1
W 2 +1
W 3 +4
W 4 +8
W 5 +13
L 6 +7
L 5 +2
W 4 +6
W 5 +11
W 6 +17
L 7 +10
W 6 +16
W 7 +23
W 8 +31
L 9 +22
L 8 +14
L 7 +7
W 6 +1
L 7 -6
L 6 -12
L 5 -17
L 4 -21
I can allready see that if i apply strict MM as Brett Morton describe it i would succeed winning three sessions in a row using hes selection based upon my knowledge.
I will test more and later set up working MM based upon the selection and variance.
Example MM Units.
80 Loss-Limit
10 Bottom-Line-Target
50 Happy-Point
70 Gold-Top
?? Jackpot
Aim for first win target and then push or fall into one safety net sound pretty cool.
On a strike push above Gold-Top and reach Jackpot territories.
Now i run next file from random org 2012 09 02
Session 4.
W 1 +1
W 2 +3
L 3 +0
W 2 +2
W 3 +5
W 4 +9
W 5 +14
W 6 +20
L 7 +13
L 6 +7
W 5 +12
L 6 +6
W 5 +11
L 6 +5
W 5 +10
W 6 +16
W 7 +23
W 8 +31
W 9 +40
L 10 +30
L 9 +21
L 8 +13
L 7 +6
This is pretty cool as this session lose - so what is the variance regarding bet selection and what is the variance for peaks and drawdowns to build the MM upon.
Session 5.
L 1 -1
L 1 -2
L 1 -3
W 1 -2
L 2 -4
W 1 -3
L 2 -5
L 1 -6
W 1 -7
L 2 -9
W 1 -8
L 2 -10
L 1 -11
L 1 -12
L 1 -13
Well so far 4 out of 5 ...
Now i test various of selections and it seems that you at least end up with 50 Euro in every session on regular basis or overall.
Have to test futher before i post suggestion for selections.
So Happy-Point should be 50 Euro - so far ...
That is the average hitting winning four sessions out of five - my opinion or what my testing show ...
Next is to find out how big drawdowns you get during does sessions you aim for a Happy-Point at 50 Euro to set a reasonable Loss-Limit.
So now the MM has empty spot at Loss-Limit values ...
? Loss-Limit
10 Bottom-Line-Target
50 Happy-Point
70 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
Thanks Ego for sharing this promising work.
I will stay tuned for sure.
Quote from: amk on Sep 03, 08:15 AM 2012
Thanks Ego for sharing this promising work.
I will stay tuned for sure.
I will has this as my main topic and update it regularly - but now i am of for work ...
I have test different bet selection based upon the previous six.
I have bet with and against using trails and formations.
Conclusion is that you can not win four out of five sessions on regular basis with some regularity.
I test it with the following MM based upon Brett Morton's way doing things.
10 Loss-Limit
3 Bottom-Line-Target
5 Happy-Point
7 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
The best hit ratio i succeed with is winning two session out of three with some regularity.
But i don't know how it performs in the long run.
Will also state that i don't like the staking plan "parlay" it is a hard and cruel staking plan to aim to hit winnings to chop or should i say find a winning bet selection for that purpose.
Quote from: ego on Sep 05, 03:21 AM 2012
I have test different bet selection based upon the previous six.
I have bet with and against using trails and formations.
Conclusion is that you can not win four out of five sessions on regular basis with some regularity.
I test it with the following MM based upon Brett Morton's way doing things.
10 Loss-Limit
3 Bottom-Line-Target
5 Happy-Point
7 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
The best hit ratio i succeed with is winning two session out of three with some regularity.
But i don't know how it performs in the long run.
Will also state that i don't like the staking plan "parlay" it is a hard and cruel staking plan to aim to hit winnings to chop or should i say find a winning bet selection for that purpose.
Would i say Brett Morton is a lie - no i would not as with some strategys you can hovering around four session out of five - i just don't know if you could do it with regularity.
This is how it could look like during 300 trails.
MM
5 Loss-Limit
1 Bottom-Line-Target
3 Happy-Point
5 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
Result:
+3 Reach Gold-Top at +5 but drop back to Happy-Point +3
+1 Reach Happy-Point at +3 but fall back to Bottom-Line-Target at +1 reaching for Gold-Top
+3 Reach Gold-Top at +5 but drop back to Happy-Point +3
-5 Did not reach Happy-Point and hit Loss-Limit
+5 Reach Gold-Top and 300 trails end so this session would end up with least Happy-Point +3
bravo Ego!
:thumbsup:
u always post here very interesting and creative stuff.
thanx man
iggiv
As long as you don't bring a logical argument against his ideas, your post will stand. Only those who say, "Hey, wait a minute!" are deleted.
Maybe logic and roulette are mutually exclusive! Then we're back to Voodoo!!
Having lots of time to do nothing but think while driving six hours a day. I may post some theories.
Sam
If somebody posts here that he can win 2 out of 3 or 4 out of 5 sessions on a regular basis then he is just an impostor and should be treated this way....
I am pretty sure that you can win 2 out of 3 on regular basis.
3 out of 4 or 4 out of 5 sure would be a hard core challange ...
Ego, I haven't gone back and re-read his book, but if my memory serves me right he includes a lot of subjective decisions in his sessions, like knowing some footprints of the dealers, etc...
It adds an unmeasurable element to his play. Makes it hard to pin him against the wall.
Quote from: GLC on Sep 05, 11:27 AM 2012
Ego, I haven't gone back and re-read his book, but if my memory serves me right he includes a lot of subjective decisions in his sessions, like knowing some footprints of the dealers, etc...
It adds an unmeasurable element to his play. Makes it hard to pin him against the wall.
Nothing more 2 add George. If you post something with clear cut rules here then everybody will jump on ya like a dog over a mailman. Be vague and you will be treated with some caution ;D
Quote from: GLC on Sep 05, 11:27 AM 2012
Ego, I haven't gone back and re-read his book, but if my memory serves me right he includes a lot of subjective decisions in his sessions, like knowing some footprints of the dealers, etc...
It adds an unmeasurable element to his play. Makes it hard to pin him against the wall.
-
True GLC ...
I did not apply educated guess work as you can not out guess 50/50 - my opinion.
What i did is that i apply the best tight attacks known for even money bets.
It did not cut it on regular basis.
But then i turn clustering patterns into the probability using a dice - then i won 4 out of 5 session.
Now the testing is to short to make any conclusion.
The question of winning 4 out of 5might not sound so illogical,l.
A bankroll for 3 sessions is divided equally into 3 , one for each session.The attempt is winning 2 out of 3 sessions.
The SAME identical bankroll can be equally divided into 5 , one for each session wth an attempt to win 4 out of 5 sessions.
Let it be known that I will NEVER claim or have ever claimed of having ALWAYS won 2 out of 3 sessions. That`s a pure phantasy by a certain poster who has the phobia that one who claims to be a winner is atleast a partner of the BELLAGIO or the WYNN.
.
Tamino!!!
Surely the win loss ratio of a cycle/game/session is not important, it is the amount lost and won per session that defines a winning ratio?
Woods
Quote from: woods101 on Sep 05, 07:04 PM 2012
Surely the win loss ratio of a cycle/game/session is not important, it is the amount lost and won per session that defines a winning ratio?
Woods
I would say both and that it also involve allot of psychology ...
Lets say that i always aim to hit Jackpot - then i will hit Bottom-Line-Target on regular basis at 1 or end up at Happy-Point at 3 ...
But if i skip the Jackpot territories i will gain more overall and maybe also Gold-Top.
When to push and when to hold profits is the question using MM.
MM
5 Loss-Limit
1 Bottom-Line-Target
3 Happy-Point
5 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
Result:
3 Reach Gold-Top at 5 but drop back to Happy-Point 3
1 Reach Happy-Point at 3 but fall back to Bottom-Line-Target at 1 reaching for Gold-Top
3 Reach Gold-Top at 5 but drop back to Happy-Point 3
-5 Did not reach Happy-Point and hit Loss-Limit
5 Reach Gold-Top and 300 trails end so this session would end up with least Happy-Point 3
That is a total of 10 won and 5 loss
5 Reach Gold-Top win target end session
1 Reach Happy-Point at 3 but fall back to Bottom-Line-Target at 1 reaching for Gold-Top
5 Reach Gold-Top win target end session
-5 Did not reach Happy-Point and hit Loss-Limit
5 Reach Gold-Top win target end session
Total 16 won and 5 loss ...
So cycles does matter with psychological state of mind - as if i only would aim for Jackpot territories if i won 4 session out of 5 and then allow me to drop back to lower win targets.
It is more complex if you think about it.
When to be satisfied and not push for Gold-Top or Jackpot and in the same time increase your overall success.
For me it seems that you push once for Gold-Top and skip Jackpot - but if you won four out of five session you could push for more and see if lady luck is on your side.
Quote from: ego on Sep 06, 01:18 AM 2012
I would say both and that it also involve allot of psychology ...
Lets say that i always aim to hit Jackpot - then i will hit Bottom-Line-Target on regular basis at 1 or end up at Happy-Point at 3 ...
But if i skip the Jackpot territories i will gain more overall and maybe also Gold-Top.
When to push and when to hold profits is the question using MM.
MM
5 Loss-Limit
1 Bottom-Line-Target
3 Happy-Point
5 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
Result:
3 Reach Gold-Top at 5 but drop back to Happy-Point 3
1 Reach Happy-Point at 3 but fall back to Bottom-Line-Target at 1 reaching for Gold-Top
3 Reach Gold-Top at 5 but drop back to Happy-Point 3
-5 Did not reach Happy-Point and hit Loss-Limit
5 Reach Gold-Top and 300 trails end so this session would end up with least Happy-Point 3
That is a total of 10 won and 5 loss
5 Reach Gold-Top win target end session
1 Reach Happy-Point at 3 but fall back to Bottom-Line-Target at 1 reaching for Gold-Top
5 Reach Gold-Top win target end session
-5 Did not reach Happy-Point and hit Loss-Limit
5 Reach Gold-Top win target end session
Total 16 won and 5 loss ...
So cycles does matter with psychological state of mind - as if i only would aim for Jackpot territories if i won 4 session out of 5 and then allow me to drop back to lower win targets.
It is more complex if you think about it.
When to be satisfied and not push for Gold-Top or Jackpot and in the same time increase your overall success.
For me it seems that you push once for Gold-Top and skip Jackpot - but if you won four out of five session you could push for more and see if lady luck is on your side.
Well i can use a sloppy footprint using clustering patterns with the probability using a dice and hit some very nice strike ratio using Brett Morton's Money Management Strategy ...
Testing a new set up.
MM units:
5 Loss-Limit
0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even-Point)
2 Happy-point
4 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
Stay and only push for Gold-Top and skip Jackpot.
+4 Session 1
+4 Session 2
+4 Session 3
- 5 Session 4
+4 Session 5
+4 Session 6
That is five session out of six ...
Quote from: ego on Sep 06, 02:25 AM 2012
Well i can use a sloppy footprint using clustering patterns with the probability using a dice and hit some very nice strike ratio using Brett Morton's Money Management Strategy ...
Testing a new set up.
MM units:
5 Loss-Limit
0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even-Point)
2 Happy-point
4 Gold-Top
? Jackpot
Stay and only push for Gold-Top and skip Jackpot.
+4 Session 1
+4 Session 2
+4 Session 3
- 5 Session 4
+4 Session 5
+4 Session 6
That is five session out of six ...
Now the losses :-) during 300 trails as above ...
- 5 Session 1
- 5 Session 2
- 5 Session 3
+0 Session 4
Every one should test to win 2 out of 3 or even with higher strike ratio using tight MM plan.
That show how difficult there is to win with tight MM rules.
Much better then using one bankroll and go all in to win a small % as noting is due to happen.
All in and you lose it all sooner or later.
(link:://i48.tinypic.com/w7lbwl.png)
I will from now on skip the staking plan "parlay" as i can't win using it.
It depends on getting chops of wins on regular basis - that is hard and cruel and very difficult.
I will change staking plan and test others also experiment with different set up with the MM.
I was thinking if you are up +1 then why would you continue.
When loses chop you try to hit first win target and if so puch to Gold-Top or hit Bottom-Line-Target at break even point.
I think that might increase the variance winning more sessions in a row.
MM Units
- 4 Loss-Limit
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+1 Happy-Point
+2 Gold-Top
+? Jackpot
I don't give up and still searching ...
Test the following MM ...
- 5 Loss-Limit
+0 Bottom-Line-Target
+2 Happy-Point
+4 Gold-Top
+? Jackpot
Test cycle's even money bets.
+5 Jackpot
+0 Bottom-Line-Target
+2 Happy-Point
- 3 Loss-Limit
- 3 Loss-Limit
+2 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target
300 Trails and seven sessions - 5 sessions won and 2 sessions lose.
Total 9 units win and 6 units loss.
Playing and push each session.
- - -
Now if i did not push for Jackpot and end at Gold-Top the result would be as follows.
+4 Gold-Top
+0 Bottom-Line-Target
+4 Gold-Top
- 3 Loss-Limit
- 3 Loss-Limit
+4 Gold-Top
+0 Bottom-Line-Target
Total won 12 units and lose 6 units.
Will test further using cycle's with the probability of a dice with clustering patterns.
That is the only way i can find some kind of footprint or signature following the flow.
It looks that it would not be impossible to win 2 out of 3 sessions - tests will show result on regular basis.
It just hard to rap your mind around how much you should push for each session - that make a big difference of the totals.
-
First i was thinking that Brett Morton's bet selection was naive using previous six events.
But i change my mind after making some heavy testing and find the bet selection being valid.
Lets say you clustering the distribution into patterns of three you will get eight possibility's.
Then you can treat each individual clustering pattern as one side with a dice with eight sides.
Now if one side repeat it self you get a similarity - same formation.
Can be RBRRBR or BBRBBR or RRRRRR and so on ...
It is in the same line of thinking as how Brett Morton describe a bet selection of six with similarity using formation.
Now a dice with eight sides looks as follows ...
(link:://i48.tinypic.com/5ob0oy.jpg)
(link:://i50.tinypic.com/2cypjxh.png)
-
Now i notice with my testing that you get several clustering patterns between before same side repeat again.
You can see it as you get 30 50 70 100 trails between or rolls or events to occur.
We could describe each clustering pattern as one roll with one dice with eight sides and you get plenty as the odds is 7 in 8 for each roll.
My conclusion is that a sequential game based upon that is valid or that Brett Morton is right to that point using a valid bet selection.
Issues do with Brett Morton is that he is using the staking plan Parlay.
That is based upon winning at least twice and more to succeed.
I have tested them all playing with and against the flow using colours and formations and there exist no way to Parlay with success winning four session out of five with that staking plan.
He claims using some kind of footprint and i find there is not such march.
With that point of view i can't see how Brett Morton' claim is true.
But i am pretty sure that you can win more session then you lose based upon this kind of bet selection.
Is just that using Brett Morton's money management does not allow a game with errors - so i have no clue yet what kind of staking plan some one should use to get a optimal game plan.
Cheers
Quote from: ego on Sep 09, 02:51 AM 2012
-
First i was thinking that Brett Morton's bet selection was naive using previous six events.
But i change my mind after making some heavy testing and find the bet selection being valid.
Lets say you clustering the distribution into patterns of three you will get eight possibility's.
Then you can treat each individual clustering pattern as one side with a dice with eight sides.
Now if one side repeat it self you get a similarity - same formation.
Can be RBRRBR or BBRBBR or RRRRRR and so on ...
It is in the same line of thinking as how Brett Morton describe a bet selection of six with similarity using formation.
Now a dice with eight sides looks as follows ...
(link:://i48.tinypic.com/5ob0oy.jpg)
(link:://i50.tinypic.com/2cypjxh.png)
-
Now i notice with my testing that you get several clustering patterns between before same side repeat again.
You can see it as you get 30 50 70 100 trails between or rolls or events to occur.
We could describe each clustering pattern as one roll with one dice with eight sides and you get plenty as the odds is 7 in 8 for each roll.
My conclusion is that a sequential game based upon that is valid or that Brett Morton is right to that point using a valid bet selection.
Issues do with Brett Morton is that he is using the staking plan Parlay.
That is based upon winning at least twice and more to succeed.
I have tested them all playing with and against the flow using colours and formations and there exist no way to Parlay with success winning four session out of five with that staking plan.
He claims using some kind of footprint and i find there is not such march.
With that point of view i can't see how Brett Morton' claim is true.
But i am pretty sure that you can win more session then you lose based upon this kind of bet selection.
Is just that using Brett Morton's money management does not allow a game with errors - so i have no clue yet what kind of staking plan some one should use to get a optimal game plan.
Cheers
Today's file from random org
2
2
2 ROLL 1
2
2
2 ROLL 2 - ONE FORMATION / REPEAT
1
2
2 ROLL 4 WON
2
2
2 ROLL 5 LOSS
2
1
2 ROLL 6 WON
1
2
2 ROLL 7 WON
2
2
1 ROLL 8 WON
2
1
1 ROLL 9 WON
1
2
1 ROLL 10 WON
2
1
1 ROLL 11 WON
2
1
1 ROLL 12 WON
1
2
1 ROLL 13 WON
2
2
1 ROLL 14 WON
1
2
1 ROLL 15 WON
1
2
2 ROLL 16 WON
2
2
2 ROLL 17 LOSS
2
1
1 ROLL 18 WON
2
1
1 ROLL 19 WON
2
2
1 ROLL 20 WON
2
2
2 ROLL 21 LOSS
1
2
1 ROLL 22 WON
1
1
1 ROLL 23 WON
2
2
2 ROLL 24 LOSS
2
2
2 ROLL 25 LOSS
-
Testing continues ...
Cheers
-
I change approach clustering patterns into two.
Using same selection as Brett Morton with previous six.
Only tweak i add is that i don't attack until a fictive win.
Staking plan "Parlay" ...
MM
-9 Loss-Limit
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point
+5 Gold-Top
+? Jackpot
I ONLY AIM FOR HAPPY-POINT TO TEST THE VARIANCE OR BREAK EVEN.
RESULTS DAY 1
300 Trails 2012 09 10 Random org
6 Session won out of 6 Session's
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point
RESULT DAY 2
300 Trails 2012 09 09 Random org
5 Session won out of 5 Session's
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
RESULT DAY 3
300 Trails 2012 09 08 Random org
4 Session won out of 4 Session's
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point
RESULT DAY 4
300 Trails 2012 09 07 Random org
6 Session won out of 6 Session's
+3 Happy-Point
+0 Bottom-Line-Target (Break Even Point)
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
18 Session won
3 Session break even
TOTALS
+54 Won 0 Loss
and against what are you exactly playing, because one of your links in your first post isnt working.
Stephan
RESULTS DAY 5
300 Trails 2012 09 06 Random org
5 Session won out of 5 Session's
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
+3 Happy-Point
-
23 Session won
3 Session break even
TOTALS
+69 Won 0 Loss
-
Quoteand against what are you exactly playing, because one of your links in your first post isnt working.
Stephan
What link ? what is not working ?
Can you be more specific ...
This link from your first post on the first page gives an error, i suppose it goes about the bet selection ?
link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10151.0 (link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10151.0)
Stephan
I test both links and they work - strange ...
Cheers
Hey ego!
don't stop, smart man!
i think i am not the only one watching
thanx!
An Error Has Occurred!
The topic or board you are looking for appears to be either missing or off limits to you.
thats what i get if i click the link :question:
Ego.
Please keep on testing,am following your thread with great interest !!!!
All the best.
Dino.
Ego, (hello me :) ) you said,
" i have no clue yet what kind of staking plan some one should use to get a optimal game plan."
I do not understand the method fully yet and just wanted to check an idea which could help.
Is there anyway to get two decent EC bets for this method?
With this I mean, after a trigger of one EC two will follow of the same, a "triple"
Can the clustering accommodate this somehow?
Quote from: amk on Sep 10, 08:28 PM 2012
Ego, (hello me :) ) you said,
" i have no clue yet what kind of staking plan some one should use to get a optimal game plan."
I do not understand the method fully yet and just wanted to check an idea which could help.
Is there anyway to get two decent EC bets for this method?
With this I mean, after a trigger of one EC two will follow of the same, a "triple"
Can the clustering accommodate this somehow?
The results above is using parlay - but with a twist.
I do only increase the bet once on a win then i go back lower the bet again.
As the MM with strict rules does not allow sloppy of fuzzy game plan.
If i would hunting long strings of winnings i would not succeed getting does results above.
Instead i been aiming for short chops of winnings - at least twice and capitalize upon does.
I find the bet selection being valid - but the issue is to find a good working march.
Will post some more results as sooner or later we will get strings of loses.
Results Day 6
300 Trails 2012 09 05 Random org
1 Session won out of 3 Session's
-9 Loss-Limit
-9 Loss-Limit
+3 Happy-Point