Timeframe and situational awareness - cycles - even money.
I use the probability of a dice with four degree of freedom.
Bet selection based upon that it will not alternating with one show for each side with out any repeat.
Conclusion - bet for present imbalance within eight attempts or betting against a present window with perfect balance.
One cycle is three loses.
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L One cycle with perfect balance
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
Well 42 people have read this post, and I can only assume that you all understand what Ego is doing, to get the W/L string.
But I don't understand and not affraid to ask.
Ego could you give some examples of play please?
Thanks
malcop
Hi Ego.
Looks very interesting,but having trouble to fully understand your concept !!
Can you show with actual spin-numbers please.
Best Regards,
Dino.
-
I find it fascinating that you can clustering outcomes into patterns and does get the same probability or freedom as a dice.
It can be a dice with four sides or eight sides or any combination we can think of.
One of the reason if also find it fascinating is that we can define one full complete cycle.
As in one dice repeating with one side or that the dice alternating with a show of each side.
So lets assume with this example you clustering pattens into two outcomes - then you get four possibility's or a dice with four sides.
11
12
22
21
Now if you pick two opposite formations after each other as trigger - then you can play against the dice to alternating and have each side with one show or with out any present repeat.
So if one formation begin with 1 and the other 2 you have two formation present.
1
1
2
1
Now next we wait for the next outcome - if 1 we play that 11 will appear and if 2 we will play that 21 will appear.
1
1
2
1
2
2 L
Now we place one bet and none of the previous sides or formation had any repeat.
Then next we would play that 2 will show as it is dominate with two shows.
1
1
2
1
2
2
1 L
Now we lose again and have our last bet to capture one repeat of one of the previous formations - that would be 11.
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
2 L
We lose and have one dice with four sides alternation with each side with one show - that is a total of three loses.
You following the distribution on rolling basis playing the march as i describe above.
Then you will get tight chops of winning strings and loop holes where one cycle alienating.
This is not a bet selection or method - for me it is observations.
Note:
The other way is to create a cycle is when one side repeats several times.
Then you wait for one side to break that cycle of repeats.
Now it chance is not so big that same side will fall back to back and repeat several times again.
After analysis of some baccarat shoes this is proving to be a good way to read random. It is a good way to see the game in the most basic form, 2 spins. I am going to look over some more baccarat shoes to see how the characteristics of this come together.
What are the odds of getting 6 or 9 losses in a row with this basic structure?
-
Advance:
Theoretical you could use one dice to alternating as one ending tail using a march based upon other principals.
There exist many different options.
Lets dictate that you would regard singles being chopping chaos.
Then you could play FTL and aim for one serie to follow by a new serie placing one bet.
If you then get a lose you have at least one singles outcome present and then you have two opposite formations present - like for example 11 21 and could aim for the ending tail not to alternating.
R
R
R W
B
B W
R
R W
B
B W
B
R
R W
R
B
R L
Now you would have RR BR and could aim for one repeat.
The down side is that you would have a string with four loses for each tail.
Selections could be that two alternating states would not follow each other after one fictive win.
I can think of many different ways to apply a trigger using a alternating dice.
And it exist other options to as playing FTL in the regular way or develop another march.