Tray this one as it is very quick earner.
Good luck...if it may be some errors just
fix it up......don't let this one escape.
Oh, my! Two Aunties! Hope he's got a little blue pill!
TCH
Always do TCS
Sorry Flat,
Little lost here, could you give us a little more detail?
Your thoughts on why this is effective, triggers etc. I can't see a consistent trigger. What is the logic of betting 1 unit on all A and C numbers and 2 units on all B numbers, why not just 1 unit on all B numbers etc.
Could you discuss this a little, would be interesting.
Thanks again.
Quote from: amk on Oct 26, 02:58 PM 2012
Sorry Flat,
Little lost here, could you give us a little more detail?
Your thoughts on why this is effective, triggers etc. I can't see a consistent trigger. What is the logic of betting 1 unit on all A and C numbers and 2 units on all B numbers, why not just 1 unit on all B numbers etc.
Could you discuss this a little, would be interesting.
Thanks again.
It's logic is that B column is your preference,and other 2 columns are covering each other.
No triggers here just continue play until you in satisfactory plus.Forgot to mention when you lose on zero,rise next bet for 3....you can continue from where I left,and tell us score..no stop L/W and
am sure you will take your 2 aunties to dinner after with the money you won....LoL
Nope!...havnt got the faintest, remotely slightest idea what this is about.
Completly baffled.
Turner
Quote from: Turner on Oct 26, 03:59 PM 2012
Nope!...havnt got the faintest, remotely slightest idea what this is about.
Completly baffled.
Turner
OK...Here it is........betting all 3 columns/inside numbers/
Starting column A and C with 1 un.on each number,while column B 2 un. on each number
rising 1 un. on each lose on column A and C while 2 un. on column B.
Very simple......but you can also play straight forward 2/1 bet directly 1 un col.A/B....1 un.col.B/C
Got it now with same rules......very strong winning bet,favorising column B.....also on dozens
favorising mid dozen.
Just to make clear to all.
col.A col. B col. C
16 2+ 2- 1- RISE 1 UN
33 2- 0- 4- 6- 4+ RISE 1 UN
12 3- 3- 6- 6+ RISE 1 UN.
35 4- 7- 16+ 4- RESTART FROM 1/B is always double/
...for me 1-3-1 works better.
Thanks
Quote from: ignatus on Oct 26, 06:31 PM 2012
...for me 1-3-1 works better.
Thanks
I am not sure I understand what is explained here.
But if we bet 1-3-1 and bet on all three cols, it is the very same as play 0-2-0 with one
exception and that is when zero hits.
If we win on the middle we get 4 plus in any of the two cases.
If the outer cols win we lose 2 units in any of the two cases.
In my opinion it is not easy to win, as the stakes eats from the winnings, when we get a streak on a col we reduce the bets on it, and raise it on the losing bets.
I do not know I may have misunderstand the rules, I understand it so we bet on all cols, and no diff in betting, so we are not reduce the lowest bet to zero and the other with the same amount.
I can not see it should not be better doing so.
Thanks Flatino,
Couldn't be simpler nor more effective. Easy to play. Can win a lot without having to play 6 or 8 hours. What more can we ask for.
I was going to post another system myself, but after trying this one for a test drive, I can't even remember what mine was about.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Oct 26, 04:57 PM 2012
Just to make clear to all.
col.A col. B col. C
16 2+ 2- 1- RISE 1 UN
33 2- 0- 4- 6- 4+ RISE 1 UN
12 3- 3- 6- 6+ RISE 1 UN.
35 4- 7- 16+ 4- RESTART FROM 1/B is always double/
this example result is +2?
---
Quote from: GLC on Oct 26, 07:14 PM 2012
Thanks F_LAT_INO,
Couldn't be simpler nor more effective. Easy to play. Can win a lot without having to play 6 or 8 hours. What more can we ask for.
I was going to post another system myself, but after trying this one for a test drive, I can't even remember what mine was about.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:
I may have spoken too soon here. I thought this was a little different bet method than it is. After some more testing I realize that all we're doing is betting on the middle dozen, or am I missing something?