#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => The Notepad => Topic started by: Turner on Nov 16, 06:07 PM 2012

Title: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 16, 06:07 PM 2012
suggestions welcome


We wait for an imbalance and play in that half.

This has hit well enough to scratch it out in notepad.

Ok.....when High or low hits 3 times...we have a noticable imbalance. Which ever numbers caused that imbalance, we play them. We add hits after but only from that High or low.

YOU MUST allways be playing the  last 3 dominant H/L numbers, if there are none, continue with the current selection

Up to now, the hit rate is very good. Early days. Zero is Low.

example

10 22 19 12 1 3 (bet 12 1 3) 14 (bet 12 1 3 14) 31(bet 12 1 3 14) 12 win 6 30 31 19 (bet 30 31 19) 2 (bet 30 31 19)  17 (bet 30 31 19)  1 ( bet 2 17 1) 36 ( bet 2 17 1) 2 win 25 3 29 29 22 (bet 29 22) 21(bet 29 22 21) 29 win

Ive run 5 sets with around 150 spins in each. No disasters. 2 sessions were insane...+300u

Early days...

Turner
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 16, 07:08 PM 2012
a random unplanned session
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 17, 08:21 AM 2012
Today...speilbank casino Airball ignore the fact the System is neighbours.....thats the current inactive program in RX

[attachimg=1]

Spielbank Wiesbaden Permanenzen

Eine Veröffentlichung oder Ver-
vielfältigung ohne schriftliche
Genehmigung dieser Daten ist
nicht gestattet.

Tisch:                       TBAS
Datum:               2012-11-16

********* Gewinnzahlen ********
N  Z  R
2       
33       
28       
      14 
33       
      32 
20       
      12 
      25 
      18 
       9 
      25 
      23 
      12 
17       
       9 
       7 
      25 
26       
8       
      21 
20       
2       
       7 
24       
29       
6       
17       
4       
15       
      14 
    0     
4       
28       
20       
      14 
20       
29       
      36 
17       
11       
8       
       9 
22       
6       
4       
29       
31       
      12 
10       
26       
      34 
15       
10       
       7 
      30 
4       
35       
      14 
      16 
      14 
      34 
      16 
28       
      34 
      25 
11       
26       
6       
8       
6       
      19 
      34 
      12 
13       
    0     
       5 
31       
    0     
35       
13       
17       
8       
      16 
      19 
17       
      36 
26       
20       
      32 
      21 
11       
      18 
4       
31       
2       
8       
      19 
11       
8       
26       
4       
      14 
      34 
35       
      25 
17       
17       
       9 
11       
      36 
       3 
       9 
15       
33       
       3 
2       
24       
8       
       3 
      36 
      19 
17       
       3 
      16 
2       
22       
      25 
26       
29       
       3 
28       
26       
4       
      19 
35       
      34 
29       
20       
      30 
11       
17       
       5 
20       
24       
11       
       3 
    0     
29       
      30 
33       
15       
      12 
      18 
6       
15       
       1 
10       
      23 
      34 
10       
22       
10       
35       
31       
      12 
       3 
      16 
      16 
      12 
6       
35       
6
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 17, 08:39 AM 2012
A short session from Willian Hill live dealer (Latvian Psudo Casino)
[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: buffalowizard on Nov 17, 09:51 AM 2012
Nice idea turner, an original twist - the initial results suggests this has may have legs!
Hope more jump aboard this

BW
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 17, 10:23 AM 2012
Quote from: buffalowizard on Nov 17, 09:51 AM 2012
Nice idea turner, an original twist - the initial results suggests this has may have legs!
Hope more jump aboard this

BW
Initial....is the key word Buff. Thats why its in notepad
I keep carping on about temporary imbalace so i thought i would put it to the test. Ive been critical of people spouting sound bites and posting nothing.
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Face on Nov 17, 04:33 PM 2012
Hi Turner!
dgt to share this file?
;)
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 17, 04:57 PM 2012
Quote from: Face on Nov 17, 04:33 PM 2012
Hi Turner!
dgt to share this file?
;)

Face....thanks for looking in. No, its not coded in RX. I can code in RX, but Im not a big fan of "survives 1,000,000 spins."
I like to test 3 hours in a casino = 180 spins.

Im just about to test other halfs.....Even/Odd. Same idea but not Hi Lo.
Keep looking in if you are interested in this idea.
Thanks
Turner
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Skakus on Nov 17, 09:19 PM 2012
You could track all 3 table layout EC's and bet any crossover numbers with higher value chips.

Like TCS's eclipse.  :)
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Nov 17, 11:29 PM 2012
when High or low hits 3 times...we have a noticable imbalance.--Turner

When high or low hits three times in a row? Or dominant three of five spins?
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Ralph on Nov 17, 11:43 PM 2012
I have coded a method using imbalance, but I do not go for them to even out. If we take a couple of 100 spins, we check the numbers of all EC, cont the zeros and add to the lowest kind, we very often see it is one EC which is dominant despite the zeros. In other words, if we have played the most frequent EC, we would have won a few chips.

The method is to play (flat) on three EC and favour the most frequent for the session. It use to hover around the starting bankroll, and we can allways break on plus of a few.

The game on the picture is not from an old better run, see the timestamp, I did it because this post.
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Ralph on Nov 18, 01:22 AM 2012
The same session after a few hundred more spins.  It is some drawdown in the range of 30 units.
It takes many spins to climb up to more than a few units.

Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: TwoCatSam on Nov 18, 11:40 AM 2012
Turner

My bankroll is just about shot to H, so I may try this as it's only 3 or 4 units per spin.  If I lose, I will certainly blame you!  How many units do you think I should risk?

This is so easy a monkey could do it.  (Why am I suddenly hungry for bananas?)

Sam
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Nov 18, 03:53 PM 2012
Turner it has to be the dominant three (or more) of the newest five spins (High/Low) so the bet is always three to five numbers.  (Just want to clear this up.)

Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Nov 18, 06:58 PM 2012
Test: BetPhoenix American Wheel 5:45pm November 18
+82
-----------------------------------------------------------
Test: Celtic American Wheel 6:18pm *Toughest Wheel Online in my opinion*
-75 (not one hit, stoploss used)
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 19, 04:49 AM 2012
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Nov 17, 11:29 PM 2012
when High or low hits 3 times...we have a noticable imbalance.--Turner

When high or low hits three times in a row? Or dominant three of five spins?
In a row proof
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 19, 04:52 AM 2012
Quote from: Skakus on Nov 17, 09:19 PM 2012
You could track all 3 table layout ECs and bet any crossover numbers with higher value chips.

Like TCS's eclipse.  :)
Skakus.....already thought of that....trying as we speak
Thanks
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 19, 04:59 AM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Nov 18, 11:40 AM 2012
Turner

My bankroll is just about shot to H, so I may try this as it's only 3 or 4 units per spin.  If I lose, I will certainly blame you!  How many units do you think I should risk?

This is so easy a monkey could do it.  (Why am I suddenly hungry for bananas?)

Sam
I personally wont play this yet. Proofs 3 in 5 may improve things or skakus "all e/c" idea and they arnt tested. Go get a bannana and ill come back to you :thumbsup:
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: TwoCatSam on Nov 19, 01:01 PM 2012
Well, I tried this at Dublin the same time I was trying Proofreader's idea.  It did not fare well for me at all.  Hits were few and far between

I did notice something very interesting, however! 

Sam
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 19, 02:19 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Nov 19, 01:01 PM 2012
Well, I tried this at Dublin the same time I was trying Proofreader's idea.  It did not fare well for me at all.  Hits were few and far between

I did notice something very interesting, however! 

Sam
Prey tell
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: TwoCatSam on Nov 19, 02:42 PM 2012
Not until someone helps me understand the FlAtMaN's new system.  OK, I'm being a meanie!  But it's good and Jl would love it!!

Gawd help me, it's HAR!!

Sam
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: TwoCatSam on Nov 23, 09:57 AM 2012
soggett helped me so here's what I saw.

This is not a system nor am I telling anyone to bet this way.  This was only a short-term observation.

While waiting for either 3 high numbers or 3 low numbers, I noticed this:

When two are preceded by one they will seldom go to three.

Yes, that even confused me!!

2 34 24.......will usually not be a high number.

34  1 7...will usually not be a low number.

I had to watch this a lot to get three in a row.

Now, when you do get three in a row it might go to nine.  So here was my thinking:

Either high or low is your trigger to be on alert.  When two opposite come after your "alert trigger" that is your bet trigger.  Bet one time only!  Then wait for another trigger.

This would have made ignatus money had I played it.  Thousands and thousands, I'm tellin' ya!!

Sam
Title: Re: dominant half
Post by: Turner on Nov 23, 01:13 PM 2012
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Nov 23, 09:57 AM 2012
soggett helped me so here's what I saw.

This is not a system nor am I telling anyone to bet this way.  This was only a short-term observation.

While waiting for either 3 high numbers or 3 low numbers, I noticed this:

When two are preceded by one they will seldom go to three.

Yes, that even confused me!!

2 34 24.......will usually not be a high number.

34  1 7...will usually not be a low number.

I had to watch this a lot to get three in a row.

Now, when you do get three in a row it might go to nine.  So here was my thinking:

Either high or low is your trigger to be on alert.  When two opposite come after your "alert trigger" that is your bet trigger.  Bet one time only!  Then wait for another trigger.

This would have made ignatus money had I played it.  Thousands and thousands, I'm tellin' ya!!

Sam

This is interesting Sam. Observation by accident....can lead to an improvement sometimes. You know when you obsess with an idea, i keep returning to this. Its not good enough. Any ideas are welcome.