This is horribly dissapointing to say the least. I began checking the sheets against the tracker and I'm sorry to say, most of them are wrong. Very wrong!
I am going to attach two sheets, L v F-7 by FlAtMan and the same by the tracker. As you can see, there is a very wide descrepancy in the two. I put the red line in as that's as far as I went.
I check about ten sheets and only two of them were what I'd call close enough to pass. None were on the money.
I need some help with this. Some other person needs to check these sheets and see if I'm making a mistake.
Sam
Sam, you don't make any mistakes :-)
i see mistakes in Flats sheet.
First one is at row 41,
He stays at bet 1 unit while the balance dropped from +9 to 0
So this should be bet 2 units.
And second mistake i saw is at row 62 and 63
These 2 are'nt wins but losses.
Also at the start he is wrong it should LFFFFLLLL and at his sheet its LFFLLLLLL
The next 3 9-cycles are the same and then the last cycle there are mistakes again.
I checked it good to be sure and saw that he makes mistakes with the fact that
if a split won from the furthest it becomes a last but you stay betting on the furthest till they loose.
Stef
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Nov 28, 10:03 PM 2012
This is horribly dissapointing to say the least. I began checking the sheets against the tracker and I'm sorry to say, most of them are wrong. Very wrong!
I am going to attach two sheets, L v F-7 by FlAtMan and the same by the tracker. As you can see, there is a very wide descrepancy in the two. I put the red line in as that's as far as I went.
I check about ten sheets and only two of them were what I'd call close enough to pass. None were on the money.
I need some help with this. Some other person needs to check these sheets and see if I'm making a mistake.
Sam
Sam,
I have mentioned at the very start that I'm doing it manually and thatthere is possibility of mistakes.
Another thing is those double numbers/that we both noticed in your last excel,where your had 4,4
while me only one 4.....as all those empty lines was deleting including those with numbers.
And here is LvF-9-7...ORIGINAL VERSION
you can see yellow lines with eventual double numbers....which I have deleted in
all my excels......And Sam sir you knew it as have told you it in other thread,didn't I,/replay 40 in
MY BEST GUESS AT TEST OF THE LvF-9
now you come with this,knewing apriori they wouldn't match.You are not Sam that you
used to be.
I checked it good to be sure and saw that he makes mistakes with the fact that
if a split won from the furthest it becomes a last but you stay betting on the furthest till they lose.
Stef
[/quote]
Stef,
I don't make mistakes beting double split,on furthest is a win,and repeater is a los as it is last 9 now.......after all it all stands in the rules........problem is these ROWS in Wiesbaden excels whic h
I have completely deleted as thought those numbers aren't in the play....after all these numbers
weren't in the same vertical line as others.
so if there is an empty spot in your excels then that means that it should be
the same number as above the empty cell?
Quote from: Stepkevh on Nov 29, 08:39 AM 2012
so if there is an empty spot in your excels then that means that it should be
the same number as above the empty cell?
THAT IS WHAT I DIDN'T KNOW UNTILL SPOTTED IT YESTERDAY DOUBLE 4 IN SAMS EXCEL AND ONLY
SINGLE 4 IN MY EXCEL...and that is the reason why my excels now don't match original excels Sam is
now recheking,and ofcourse possibility of manual typo,that's why we wana tracker to recheck it up.
I am done with this. Does anyone blame me?
No I don't Sam
Trebor
I'll attach something. You can see it. The -s are how far down and the +s is the final win.
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Dec 01, 02:52 PM 2012
I'll attach something. You can see it. The -s are how far down and the +s is the final win.
It looks like the one -1440 eats up all the other wins. Is that right?
obviusly you should set a decent stop loss in the sheet.
but i think that the numbers that sam mention on his files are the largest drawdowns.
Stef
Quote from: Stepkevh on Dec 01, 03:57 PM 2012
obviusly you should set a decent stop-loss in the sheet.
but i think that the numbers that sam mention on his files are the largest drawdowns.
Stef
It would be good if a stop-loss could prevent all the wins from going away. I notice the average draw-down is considerably larger than the average win. Is there a way to set a stop loss with the tracker? Whether there is or isn't, there should be a way in Excel to test various stop loss levels to see if there are any that keep all the wins from going away.
Yes, I could set a stop loss, but I like to run several tests and then look at the losses and wins and try to figure out a stop loss for the future. Yes, the 1440 would destroy you!
I am thinking a 400 u stop loss or maybe less.
Sam
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Dec 01, 04:36 PM 2012
Yes, I could set a stop-loss, but I like to run several tests and then look at the losses and wins and try to figure out a stop-loss for the future. Yes, the 1440 would destroy you!
I am thinking a 400 u stop-loss or maybe less.
Sam
I agree its better to collect data than to set a stop loss in tests. That way, various levels of stop loss can be tested...and hope it is not too retro-fit to a certain set of data. So that stop loss would have to be applied to another set of data and see if it works out.
Is the controversy about the rules settled?
As far as I'm concerned, the rules are etched in stone!