I was lucky to find this old ELMO method from 2009. It can challenge a dozen missing for 25-30 spins.
He did not create a thread for this method but was randomly posted within another thread.
I wanted to see what the opinions are and if anyone can figure out the progression.
UNIQUE ELMO METHOD
o.k. here we go!
Wait for the 7-12 or 25-30 to come out 4 times at least.
What must NOT come out is the 1-6 or 31-36.
If the 13-18 or 19-24 come out, just ignore them, so as an example.
11
13
19
7
14
20
25
13
30
o.k. there you have had 9 spins and the 7-12 and 25-30 have come out the required 4 times. The 1-6 and 31-36 have went missing which is excactly what we were looking for.
Now we will use an 8 step progression but in a unique way.
put 1 unit on the 1-3 street.
put 1 unit on the 4-6 street.
put 1 unit on the 13-18 double street.
put 1 unit on the 19-24 double street.
put 1 unit on the 31-33 street.
put 1 unit on the 34-36 street.
Now to make a profit, we are hoping the 1-3, 4-6, 31-33, or 34-36 street appears but if the 13-18 double street or 19-24 double street appear, we get returned our chips. So in effect we are either going to win 6 or draw even.
The only thing that can beat us is if the 7-12 double street or 25-30 double street appear, in which case we go to step 2 in the progression of a total of 8 steps.
This is a good way of playing because even if we don't hit our 1-3, 4-6, 31-33 or 34-36 street for a profit, we will many times just get our stake back and not have to move up 1 in the progression.
What this all means is that for us to lose completely, we are going to have to witness a dozen (which our 4 potential winning streets are) not coming out for something like over 20+ spins. Remember just for the qualifying in this instance, it took 9 spins and we saw no 1-3, 4-6, 31-33 or 34-36. And now we can play an 8 step progression where even if the 13-18 or 19-24 show up a lot, we are always going to be returned our chips and we do not have to move up 1 in the progression.
So it is possible you could go through 25-30 spins and still only be at level 3 or 4 in the progression when you hit your winner. It is fair to say that you will very seldom ever lose a game playing this way and you will build up some really nice profits.
amk
To my way of thinking, you would be waiting forever and a day for a bet. This could have a longer wait time than Jl's "Pattern Breaker". I assume when one of the "no-no's" appear, you start from scratch.
A bot working at BVNZ might have a chance, but I doubt it.
Sam
Thanks for your reply and friendly insights TwoCat.
Could we perhaps just wait for a dozen to repeat 4 times? lets say 3 times : )
or maybe the dozen missing most in 10, 15 or 20 spins. I think this will actually be very strong.
We could use this sort of bet selection to our advantage. Only very rarely are bets mentioned which include a no win or loss selection..
Hopefully someone might even see other applications.
Looking forward to insights.
Wow, just saw that mr.ore is on the thread.
Last post was in November 2011
Hello mr.ore, hope you might post some insights, would be great! :D
Hello, just looking what happened after all that time ;D . Seems nothing new here, I was just curious...
Regarding the method, a dozen CAN realistically be missing for 60 spins. I mean, if you simulate for long enough, it will happen...
Hello mr ore :D
Wow, a dozen missing 60 spins. Have you seen this?
Just focusing on the method, what do you think the progression might be?
Might be interesting to test.
I hope someone might see the usefulness of this method as I do.
The method should not be overlooked in my opinion.