Place 6 Streets: 1/3, 7/9, 13/15, 19/21, 25/27, 31/33.
When one street is hit, it's moved accordingly (always between these two);
1/3 <--> 4/6
7/9 <--> 10/12
13/15 <--> 16/18
19/21 <--> 22/24
25/27 <--> 28/30
31/33 <--> 34/36
So for an example if street 13/15 is hit it's moved to street 16/18... if street 16/18 hit it's moved back to 13/15 and so on.
+1 Negative progression for each loss until 2 hits in a row: then reset to minimum bet. (No progression when hit).
Simple but effective system.
Hey Ignatus. You could go twelve attempts flat-
bet and still break even by playing one street at a time.
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Mar 29, 10:03 AM 2013
Hey Ignatus. You could go twelve attempts flat-
bet and still break even by playing one street at a time.
Hmm alright, yes, I haven't tried that. Still i don't really understand how you mean "playing one street at a time" ? :S
Streetwise -=|Ghost Version|=-
Place 6 streets 1/3 ,7/9, 13/15, 16/18, 19/21, 25/27.
As each street hits it's removed, and +1 bet on all others. Negative progression +1 bet for each loss. One sessio End after 4 streets have been hit. (Each street hit is removed until only 3 streets remain) After last hit progression is reset and the streets are placed in reverse order:
4/6, 10/12, 16/18, 22/24, 28/30, 34/36.
Repeat.
After session is finished: Street is placed in reversed order again: 1/3 ,7/9, 13/15, 16/18, 19/21, 25/27.
I'm +371 SEK now (started with 200 SEK) playing live at Eurogrand. Real Money.
TCS<---------------hiding under bed after reading Ghost Version!
Quote from: ignatus on Mar 29, 02:41 PM 2013
Hmm alright, yes, I haven't tried that. Still i don't really understand how you mean "playing one street at a time" ? :S
Based on your original diagram, whenever one street hits to bet the street pointed to.
Example: if s1/3 hits <--> *play s4/6 (Is that right?)
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Mar 29, 06:29 PM 2013
Based on your original diagram, whenever one street hits to bet the street pointed to. Example: if s1/3 hits <--> *play s4/6 (Is that right?)
Ok, yes. Perhaps the first version works best ;)