link:://michaelsfranklin.com/msf_files/RetrocausalRouletteBriefSummary2012.pdf (link:://michaelsfranklin.com/msf_files/RetrocausalRouletteBriefSummary2012.pdf)
Experiment for according to random numbers and independent events. They try to predict from previous numbers using scientific acceptable methods.
I found it interesting, but still sceptic.
link:://:.michaelsfranklin.com/msf_files/Page484.htm (link:://:.michaelsfranklin.com/msf_files/Page484.htm)
Here is a test there you can check your ability to use retrocausation.
The most sceptic may check the calender!
Interesting test Ralph
p h
g + w
j a
Quote from: Chrisbis on Apr 01, 10:19 AM 2013
Interesting test Ralph
p h
g + w
j a
i havnt read this and wont do for a day or 2 seeing as its april fools day. The wifes already got me this morning :embarrassed:
Everyone has their own methods. Not all strategies work for everyone, for some reason. You have to try a few different ones until you figure out which one works best for you.
Quote from: Crapshooter on Dec 23, 05:50 AM 2015
Not all strategies work for everyone, for some reason.
Losing strategy doesnt work for anyone, winning strategy works for everyone ;) It is really that simple.
Happy holidays
Drazen
Quote from: Drazen on Dec 23, 06:34 AM 2015
Losing strategy doesnt work for anyone, winning strategy works for everyone ;) It is really that simple.
Happy holidays
Drazen
That's an excellent point, Drazen!
As for the paper, I have to agree with Ralph about being skeptical, although I always enjoy reading studies like this.
Nixie
Have you read the whole paper? Studied it? Just curious.
TwoCat
Well, it's colder'n a booger bear here, so I'll ramble a while. Sure would like some soul to join me in this thought experiment.
I wonder several things:
1. How long are the subjects allowed to study the four shapes before beginning?
2. How many subjects are there: two or twenty?
3. If there are twenty, are they grouped in two groups of ten and the coin flipped to see who is A and who is B.....OR
4. Is each of the twenty given their own personal coin flip..........AND
5. Would it matter?
6. While the actual viewing of the shape is happening, how long does one have to click? 1/2 second? Ten seconds?
7. What if the shapes were virtually identical? What if they were very different such as a horse, a knife, a piece of cake and a mountain?
Suppose we tested this for real. We would need four totally different shapes each time we played. Obviously we could not seek shape A or B as we would get very good at picking them and ruin the test. So how would we get four shapes?
Lastly for this post, if this was a hoax for April Fool's Day, it was an elaborate one. I am going to delve a bit deeper into this Franklin fellow and see if I can learn more.
Comments?
Samster
Good to know I still have the ability to stop a thread cold in its tracks!