OK, so I studied live wheel patterns, I tried one set of patterns, they didn't work. I studied some more live spins/patterns. Now this is what i found;
Live-Wheel Pattern (that works/seems to work)
Whenever column 1 & 3 hit; (8 numbers bet)
If column 3, doz 1 hit; Column 1 doz 2 & 3 numbers are bet.
If column 3, doz 2 hit; Column 1 doz 1 & 3 numbers are bet.
If column 3, doz 3 hit; Column 1 doz 1 & 2 numbers are bet.
If column 1, doz 1 hit; Column 3 doz 2 & 3 numbers are bet.
If column 1, doz 2 hit; Column 3 doz 1 & 3 numbers are bet.
If column 1, doz 3 hit; Column 3 doz 1 & 2 numbers are bet.
Progression: 8 numbers Negative progression 1.1.1.1.2.2.3.4.5.6.8.10.13.17.22
My first Live-session @ "castle casino" 10/10 games won.
1. W
2. LLW
3. LLLW
4. LLLLW
5. W
6. W
7. W
8. W
9. LLLLLW
10.LW
188U~
so if I got this right
| Num | Dozen | Column | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 30 | 3 | 3 | l |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | w |
| 33 | 3 | 3 | w |
| 27 | 3 | 3 | l |
| 15 | 2 | 3 | l |
| 21 | 2 | 3 | l |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | l |
| 26 | 3 | 2 | l |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | l |
| 35 | 3 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | l |
| 9 | 1 | 3 | l |
| 23 | 2 | 2 | l |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | w |
| 34 | 3 | 1 | l |
| 30 | 3 | 3 | l |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | l |
| 31 | 3 | 1 | |
| 26 | 3 | 2 | l |
| 22 | 2 | 1 | |
| 35 | 3 | 2 | l |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | l |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | l |
| 33 | 3 | 3 | l |
| 8 | 1 | 2 | l |
| 18 | 2 | 3 | |
| 24 | 2 | 3 | l |
| 29 | 3 | 2 | l |
| 8 | 1 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | 3 | l |
| 21 | 2 | 3 | l |
| 32 | 3 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | l |
| 24 | 2 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2 | 2 | l |
| 25 | 3 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | w |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | l |
| 34 | 3 | 1 | |
| 30 | 3 | 3 | l |
| 11 | 1 | 2 | l |
| 32 | 3 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | 1 | |
HMM.....yes......Was that real Live-spins, or invented numbers?.......
This is what i figure. (I've doublechecked both numbers and the W/L);
3
30 L
16 W
33 W
27 L
15 L
21 L
0 L
26
16
5 L
35
6
7 L
9
23 L
11
14
6
22 W
34 L
30 L
20 L
31
26
22
35 L
6
4 L
6 L
33 L
8 L
18
24
29 L
8
6
9 L
21 L
32 L
16
20 L
24
20 L
25
6 W
2 L
34
30 L
11
32
2
10
live spins, first session I picked, guess I'm not lucky today
Quote from: soggett on May 24, 11:20 AM 2013
live spins, first session I picked, guess I'm not lucky today
OK, well, ......I don't know what to say... I must have been very lucky then when I played my live-sessions....hmmm This need more testing, for sure. But stoploss is a good idea (as usual) now, how would you set stoploss for this kind of bet ??
Thanks soggett.
Did same thing as you, a random pick of Live-Spins; (not much better results?)
9
12 L
21 L
24
12 L
17 L
10
34
16 L
20 L
4
4 L
18 W
28 W
34 L
5 L
27
31 L
8 L
9
12 L
35 L
12
11 L
24
19
9 W
16 W
16 L
16 L
21 L
34 W
17
29
0
15 L
29
20
16
11 L
2
16
27 W
35 L
18
Quote from: ignatus on May 24, 11:33 AM 2013
OK, well, ......I don't know what to say... I must have been very lucky then when I played my live-sessions....hmmm This need more testing, for sure. But stoploss is a good idea (as usual) now, how would you set stoploss for this kind of bet ??
Thanks soggett.
no problem
I think the main problem here is that you are not betting the second column, only first and third
maybe implement different progression, like stop after 4 L's and wait for virtual win then +1 and so on, cyclic betting?
Quote from: ignatus on May 24, 11:44 AM 2013
Did same thing as you, a random pick of Live-Spins; (not much better results?)
9
12 L
21 L
24
12 L
17 L
10
34
16 L
20 L
4
4 L
18 W
28 W
34 L
5 L
27
31 L
8 L
9
12 L
35 L
12
11 L
24
19
9 W
16 W
16 L
16 L
21 L
34 W
17
29
0
15 L
29
20
16
11 L
2
16
27 W
35 L
18
theese are better
using 4L's then wait for trigger you would have gotten +64 units, max bet was 2
in my example we would be only betting 3 units per spot
I don't have the next numbers, it was a small sample
Quote from: soggett on May 24, 11:45 AM 2013
no problem
I think the main problem here is that you are not betting the second column, only first and third
maybe implement different progression, like stop after 4 L's and wait for virtual win then +1 and so on, cyclic betting?
I was thinking the same thing! Thanks.
Cyclic betting is good! -1/+1 (after 4 spins)
Well, betting for the whole column would be a 12 number bet ? ....
Quote from: ignatus on May 24, 11:50 AM 2013
I was thinking the same thing! Thanks.
Cyclic betting is good! -1/+1 (after 4 spins)
Well, betting for the whole column would be a 12 number bet ? ....
I didn't mean to bet the whole column
we are betting numbers only from coulmn 1 and 3 - that's the main problem - what if column 2 gets hot?
you should try to put it in our betting somehow ie, if "x" hits bet column 2 and dozen "y" and "z"
keep in mind that systems mechanical like that tend to fail (by mechanical I mean if this hits play that - you need to adopt to what is happening)
think your 6 numbers system might be better?
ok, well, I do a W/L over more numbers and we'll see ....
So, I did a longer session. This strategy is *definitly* a failure. Should have tested it before i posted it.
I am sorry.
***IGNORE THIS THREAD**** it's a Non-working strategy.
27
7 W
22 L
16
21 L
19 L
20 L
33
16 W
12 W
30 L
13 W
30 W
35 L
4
30 W
4 W
6 L
12 L
30 L
34 L
12 W
10 L
29 L
32
2
24
19 L
29 L
36
26 L
20
5
29
28
12 W
24 L
25 W
2 L
4
10 L
7 L
16 L
5 L
6
30 L
30 L
25 L
3 W
0 L
13
29 L
6
12 L
24 L
5
11
32
35
10
6 L
6 L
1 L
12 L
21 L
16 L
31 L
24 W
21 L
0 L
33
30 L
31 L
12 W
20 L
20
16
14 L
17 L
4 L
36 W
17 L
6
4 L
13 L
26
4 L
11
16
26 L
16
30 W
17
2
18
0 L
11
34
10 L
35 L
29 L
4
20 L
0
7 L
35
26
17
5
23
16
28 L
32
18
26 L
27
6
29
25 W
3
26 L
23
10
13 L
25 L
30 L
27 L
22 W
12 W
23 L
23
30
7 W
9 L
29 L
27
23 L
34