Hello friends,
Since some very interesting threads on this forum (started by Fripper), namely
How to play with a "labby" (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6451.msg60743#msg60743) and Beating roulette with math (link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=3280.0)
contain outdated links to my site (I'm constantly messing around with it ;-)), I'd like to update you to the correct links:
Johnsonn Progression (link:://main.x/forum/index.php?topic=9.0)
Beating roulette with math... (link:://main.x/forum/index.php?topic=8.0)
Thank you for your interest.
Thanks Kav.
It's really good to read about methods that are approaching beating this game 100% of the attacks. It reminds us that to win on a consistent basis we must have a decent bankroll and be willing to put some real time and effort into it.
GLC
Johnson Progression:
"Start with a series of 20 times 1 in a list. (this will be your win)
Play first+last term like a Labby. (first bet is 2)
When you win: cancel the two terms.
When you lose: distribute loss over the 20 terms from left to right in the series,
starting from the previous entry point."
I think my topic on "Static Number Labby" is worth looking at in relation to this topic since it's an almost identical concept.
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6963.msg64441#msg64441
Please note that anytime we have 5 wins in a row, we will finish the line when we start with 10 numbers. Or if we only have 6 numbers left, 3 wins in a row will eliminate the line.
As with all negative progressions, if we have a bad loss to win ratio at a late point in our progression, we will find ourselves in serious trouble which is why we must be willing to split the units sizes to reduce bet sizes and take longer to finish the line.
GLC
Hello GLC,
Indeed. Your approach is very similar and well worth studying.