well now, trying something new here...this has worked for me both on RNG and Live. but since i don't have rx, i can't make any graphs. more testing is needed...
This is a six splits bet, (or 12 numbers).
Track each column hit within each dozen. There are 3 columns within each dozen, there are 3 dozens, this gives us NINE individual lines to track. ok
Trigger: wait until 6 individual dozen/column lines have been hit, then bet the remaining 3 unhit lines.
progression: negative dozen progression (splits) 1 1 2 3 4 6 9 14 21 31 47 70
to make it easier i use notepad and for each new trigger i look at the history of spins:
write down 1,2,3 (these are the 3 columns) then a, b, c, this are the three dozens so it would look like this:
six hits, (the remaining 3 is bet):
1: a b (first and second dozen is hit within column 1) bet would be c: column 1, dozen 3
2: b (second dozen is hit within column 2) bet would be a & c: column 2, dozen 1 & 3
3: a b c (all dozens is hit within column 3) no bet.
..playing this on Dublinbet 2-3 hours now, not one trigger lost, profit ~200u.
Never went beyond 1 1 2 3 4 6 9 14 progression. Table limit for splits on db is 20.
...continue playing for less than an hour, won another 100u on DB.
Lucky or what? now playing on db I won SIX times in a row on the first spin... 8)
test 2, celtic live casino: +88u...
test 3 jackpot247 (airball machine) +150u playing with 5u bets...
Goodmorning! a new day, new tests of this strategy, it has been very successful so far.
test 4, dublinbet +100u (playing with 1u bets)
cheers
Hello Ignatus,
I am posting a reply so that this system will be brought to everyone`s notice. Up to now WOW. never had a loss and highest progression was 3. Not sure if I am playing it exactly like you state but who cares (I wait until 6 splits not hit and then bet them)
Was looking through back posts and liked the look of this - glad I did. I am sure that there are some other nuggets that have been overlooked.
I wait for a win then leave that table so that I can use history on another table to start again.
Keep up the good work Ignatus - you are a stalwart of this forum THX.
Regards and good luck, Brian
Ig is priceless!
Who knows what to expect from him in future...?
Brian...how many sessions did you play?
You have a money management suggestion?
Your hard work is often overlooked.
Some diamonds in the rough
I will try it after work
Hello Denzie,
About 30 sessions (each one individual just waiting for a win) I have also back checked some of my previous spins and it seems that wins come in the first of the progression 1 1 2 3 (lose 42 units - there are many wins to make up for 1 loss) Brave souls may want to continue on with the progression that Ignatus gives but I think that I will stop at the four steps. I did spot when back checking one RFH which would have wiped you out. Pleased I was not playing that. It shows the importance of using a stop loss. A different progression maybe better if you want to carry on.
Good luck,
Brian
Maybe I'm having a bad day, But I dont understand it :-[ Could somebody maybe explane the"for idiots" example
Thanks Guys
Thanks to both ignatus for devising this system and bleep for bringing it back to life. I will do some testing to see how it goes.
This must be the 9 groups (mini columns) each one have 2 splits.
When 6 groups hit , bet the 3 sleeper groups ( 3 x 2 splits = 12 numbers).
This is same as bet one sleeping dozen after 6 ( or more ) Ls.
--------------------------
Maybe not the best choise (bet the sleepers) in my opinion , better try also others combinations.
Can try also a possitive progression:
bet for max. 4 times after trigger , then W or L4 bet again after next trigger,
1,1,2,2/ 2,3,3,4/ 4,5,5,6/ 6,7,7,8/ 8,9,9,10 .
So + 1 after W ( in necesary only , if not then just flat) / down one level after L4 (never rise after L4)
reset to first level when new high , also reset when recovered from some DD (not necesary new high )
cheers
Quote from: sturrock on Feb 16, 11:15 AM 2016
Maybe I'm having a bad day, But I dont understand it :-[ Could somebody maybe explane the"for idiots" example
Thanks Guys
Don't worry I've just got it :)
I've been testing this on Celtic euro wheels for the past week (with my usual very low stakes) with excellent results - bank didn't bust (in fact never went past 5th progression during 30 sessions).
However I then decided to pick the six splits at random (over the same number of sessions) ignoring previous spin results and it performed better - never going past the fourth progression.
Conclusion:
Do we put this down to luck or maybe something that some seasoned forum members preach about and that is you cannot base a winning system on spin history - in which case do we say most of the strategies put forward on this forum are in fact just bet selectors that give us false confidence as they are selected using a fixed system.
I've done well with the Grassroots 123 strategy up until now which is again based on the spin history and probability, however my next test will be to select 2 x dozens at random each time and see how that pans out.
I'm not knocking or being negative against all the hard work and brain power than goes into this forum just an observation/realisation from a rookie - I'd be every interested in anyone's thoughts either way.
Nick
Thanks for testing Nick-the-Greek :) Glad you liked it, and that it worked good for you