#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Hi forum friends,

Just sharing something -  found this on LTW forum recently:

QuoteThe method is simple to play and uses a 1-2 bet , In the description it is like this, if you see a Player then you bet 1 unit player if win keep betting 1 unit player. If you lose to a Banker then you look at PB and now bet 2 units on Banker.
If this wins you stop bets and wait for another player.

So you will win on a PP and if you lose then win it will be PBB using a 1-2 bet.

Now if it goes PBP then you lose the 1-2 bet and return to 1 unit on P next time Player occurs.

If it wins you continue with 1 unit for player, and if win then another 1 unit on player until banker causes the player bet to lose.

The win goal is 4 units and buy in is 10 units.

This seems like a simple strategy and after playing a shoe I recorded last weekend won my 4 units.

It also says this can be played on the colors of roulette; It seem like such a low bet structure and low buy in. I was wondering if anyone took time to test the method out? If so what was the % shoes won with 4 units verses the loss of 10 units.

Example 50 random results played on roulette. Same r/b results used for both outcomes (triggers in bold)
Betting stopped if a 0 occurs during betting until next trigger.

Target = +4

If Playing RED Side:
============
b
b
b
0
r
r w+1              +1
b L-1               +0
b w+2              +2
b
r
r w+1              +3
r w+1              +4
r w+1              +5
r w+1              +6
b L-1               +5
b w+2             +7
b
r
r w+1              +8
r w+1              +9
r w+1              +10
b L-1               +9
r L-2                +7
b
r
b L-1               +6
0 L-2               +4
b
b
r                   
r w+1              +5
b L-1               +4
b w+2              +6
b   
b
b
b
r
b L-1                +5
b w+2               +7
b
r
b L-1               +6
r L-2                +4
b
r
r w+1              +5
b L-1               +4
r L-2                +2
r

End of 50 spins.

w = +18
L = -16
Profit = +2
High = +10


If Playing BLACK side:
=============
b
b  w+1      +1
b  w+1      +2
0  L-1       +1
r
r
b
b  w+1      +2
b  w+1      +3
r   L-1       +2
r  w+2       +4
r
r
r
b
b w+1        +5
b w+1        +6
r  L-1         +5
r  w+2        +7
r
r
b
r  L-1         +6
b L-2         +4
r
b
0 L-1          +3
b
b w+1         +4
r L-1           +3                     
r w+2          +5
b
b  w+1        +6
b  w+1        +7
b  w+1        +8
b  w+1        +9
b  w+1        +10
r  L-1          +9
b  L-2         +7       
b
b  w+1        +8
r  L-1          +7
b  L-2         +5
r
b
r  L-1          +4
r  w+2         +6
b
r  L-1          +5
r w+2         +7

End of 50 spins.

w = +23u
L = -16u
Profit = +7
High = +10


Doesn't look half too bad at all!   :smile:

Atlantis.

 :smile:

Here is an attached test1 with a modified rule:

Play it as a 1-1 bet instead of 1-2

Only play second stage of bet at 2u *if 3 or more wins in a row gained at stage 1 (betting chosen color) before a loss happens*

A.

Even with the modified test I don't think any advantage to be gained over the original possibly - and it's still a grind too!
Next two tests were quite negative -16 and -19 over 200 spins.
A.

Another bet selection for an EVENS flatbet stake system would be to follow the CHOP and/or bet that a STREAK of 2 will end.

For example:

R,B - bet for chop to continue eg: R

B, B - bet for streak to end eg: R

If  a sequence of 3 consecutive colours occurs eg: B, B, B - no bet until change of colour occurs where you will then bet on the CHOP ie. B in this instance.

A.

I posted after waking up and realized I was an idiot.  Lacking delete, I will just eat this crow right here and be none the wiser.

Welcome aboard Colbster.  We've all been there and done that. 

Where is that delete button when you need it?

I always know someone else has stepped in it when I see a post that's nothing but a period.

Occasionally I've had to ask a mod to delete a post for me to prevent looking like an idiot in perpetuity.



GLC