#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Bet selection => Topic started by: ignatus on Oct 31, 07:39 AM 2014

Title: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 07:39 AM 2014
Very good results so far.... i tried follow trend (that didn't work) so i tried the opposite, that did work.

it's a 12 numbers bet.

two last dozens hit are always bet.

flatbet

trigger: wait for a pattern (last 3 spins) then bet against it for the next two spins, straight up, 12 number bet (two last doz hit)

RBR, then bet R
BRB, then bet B
BBB, then bet R
RRR, then bet B

so for an example you get RBR, and two last dozen hit is 1 & 3. then all REDs are bet in dozen 1 & 3..... lets say dozen 2 black hits, and last two dozens hit is 3 & 2, then you have a RBRB Pattern, the second bet would be all blacks in dozen 3 & 2. STOP after 2 spins and look for the next trigger.
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 09:12 AM 2014
more spins...
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 10:27 AM 2014
4/4 games won.
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 03:44 PM 2014
5/5 games won....
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: falkor on Oct 31, 03:54 PM 2014
Looks good! What's the most successful system you've used to date? (not women)

I need to be more successful all-round so will give this a shot!
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 03:58 PM 2014
Quote from: falkor on Oct 31, 03:54 PM 2014
Looks good! What's the most successful system you've used to date? (not women)

I need to be more successful all-round so will give this a shot!

i have not failed with this system yet, 5 winning sessions in a row....but more testing is needed
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: falkor on Oct 31, 04:03 PM 2014
I'm with you all the way on this one!

If the last 2 dozens hit were the same is that not a valid trigger? Or do you look back at the past 3 or 4 spins until you see 2 different dozens?
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 04:07 PM 2014
Quote from: falkor on Oct 31, 04:03 PM 2014
I'm with you all the way on this one!

If the last 2 dozens hit were the same is that not a valid trigger?

thanks  :) yes its a valid trigger
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: falkor on Oct 31, 04:28 PM 2014
So does that mean you would bet 2 units on each of the 6 reds or black in the single dozen that previously hit twice in a row?
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 04:37 PM 2014
Quote from: falkor on Oct 31, 04:28 PM 2014
So does that mean you would bet 2 units on each of the 6 reds or black in the single dozen that previously hit twice in a row?

no, you always bet the last two dozens hit, flatbet. STOP after 2 losses and look for a new trigger... read first post
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: falkor on Oct 31, 05:12 PM 2014
I read the first post several times, but I'm still struggling to understand that particular situation:
you said it's a 12 number bet and you gave examples only of 2 different dozens.

But if you get RRR and dozen 2,2 how would you play the next 2 bets?
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 05:26 PM 2014
Quote from: falkor on Oct 31, 05:12 PM 2014
I read the first post several times, but I'm still struggling to understand that particular situation:
you said it's a 12 number bet and you gave examples only of 2 different dozens.

But if you get RRR and dozen 2,2 how would you play the next 2 bets?

if you have a RRR-trigger, and let's say last two dozens hit are 1, 2 next bet would be all BLACKs in doz 1,2. let's say dozen 1, RED  hits again, still the bet would be all blacks in dozen 1,2 then STOP (if one dozen repeat, still look for the last 2 doz hit)


btw, i had my first losing session now... (nothing is perfect) but i have still good hopes for this system....
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: RouletteGhost on Oct 31, 05:34 PM 2014
i think the number with 4 neighbors method had some merit. more testing needed on that. dont abandon system so quickly tweak it
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 05:43 PM 2014
6/7 games won...
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Oct 31, 05:46 PM 2014
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Oct 31, 05:34 PM 2014
i think the number with 4 neighbors method had some merit. more testing needed on that. dont abandon system so quickly tweak it

that one didn't work, the idea was good, but when i tested it failed pretty soon. i tested betting 3 neigbours (7 numbers, same bet) for 5 spins, i had better luck with that. (but this doesn't belong to this thread)...
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Nov 01, 07:11 AM 2014
7/8 games won....
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ozon on Nov 04, 04:22 PM 2014
What happened  with this one . Some new tests?
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Nov 04, 05:38 PM 2014
Quote from: ozon on Nov 04, 04:22 PM 2014
What happened  with this one . Some new tests?

no, just stop testing because of lack of interest i guess...
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ozon on Nov 06, 07:12 AM 2014
I play this strategy and  I think  that  bet  selection    is   very  stable ,  but to achieve  profit  target   you must  wait long  time.
We   can   add  mild  proggresion    1  1  1   1   1  ,   1.5  1.5  1.5 1.5  1.5  ,   2  2  2  2  2  2   2  ,   3   3   3   3   3   ... when   we  reach   3   we  stay   on  3  to  the   end.
Ex .  In dublinbet   we  take   base  1 unit  20c   ,   bankroll  we need   200E     ,profit  target   10%  per   session.
Title: Re: Anti-Trend
Post by: ignatus on Nov 06, 07:55 AM 2014
Quote from: ozon on Nov 06, 07:12 AM 2014
I play this strategy and  I think  that  bet  selection    is   very  stable ,  but to achieve  profit  target   you must  wait long  time.
We   can   add  mild  proggresion    1  1  1   1   1  ,   1.5  1.5  1.5 1.5  1.5  ,   2  2  2  2  2  2   2  ,   3   3   3   3   3   ... when   we  reach   3   we  stay   on  3  to  the   end.
Ex .  In dublinbet   we  take   base  1 unit  20c   ,   bankroll  we need   200E     ,profit  target   10%  per   session.

alright  :)