#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Testing zone => Topic started by: RouletteGhost on Mar 23, 09:44 PM 2015

Title: european cover the wheel strategy
Post by: RouletteGhost on Mar 23, 09:44 PM 2015
I saw this strategy on another forum. I have copied and pasted it. If you are here and upset i have shared it let me know. Lots of experts here i want to know what you think:

30 BLACK
30 HIGH
30 ODD
20 1st DOZEN
40 1st COLUMN
40 3rd COLUMN
10 STREET 16,17,18
2.5 SPLITS 2/5 5/8 20/23 23/26
5 STRAIGHT 32
7.5 STRAIGHT on 0 and 14

Total: 230

Let's see now what happens when each and every number appears:

0 = +40
1 = +10
2 =  -20
3 = +10
4 = +10
5 = +70
6 = +10
7 = +10
8 =  -20
9 = +10
10=+10
11= -50
12= -50
13=+10
14=+40
15=+10
16=+10
17=+10
18=+10
19=+10
20= -20
21=+10
22=+10
23=+70
24=+10
25=+10
26= -20
27=+10
28=+10
29= -50
30= -50
31=+70
32=+10
33=+70
34= -50
35= -50
36= -50

Betting summary:

20 numbers x 10 = +200
4 numbers x 70 = +280
2 numbers x 40 = +80
7 numbers x 50 = -350
4 numbers x 20 = -80
(200+280+80)-(350+80)= 560 - 430 = 130 NET PROFIT.
Title: Re: european cover the wheel strategy
Post by: RouletteGhost on Mar 23, 09:53 PM 2015
I think it is no good....
Title: Re: european cover the wheel strategy
Post by: TwoCatSam on Mar 23, 09:58 PM 2015
Being the big ol' dummy I am, I'll look at it.
Title: Re: european cover the wheel strategy
Post by: RouletteGhost on Mar 23, 10:00 PM 2015
Thats what the forums all about!
Title: Re: european cover the wheel strategy
Post by: TwoCatSam on Mar 23, 11:04 PM 2015
OK, the 0 and 1 check out but the 2 has me puzzled.  I get -65.

Check me out on this:  The splits at 2.5...that would be 17x2.5=42.5.  Then you minus the three losing splits at 2.5 each and that is 7.5 for a net win on the split bet of 35.

What does anyone else get..

Sam
Title: Re: european cover the wheel strategy
Post by: TwoCatSam on Mar 23, 11:41 PM 2015
I think the problem is he is counting the splits as having 2.5 units on each number instead of splitting the numbers.  I ran the 20 and it is not right either.