Am going to test drive this some more, because unlike many of my other systems, I think this one has some real legs! Here we go with some random spins. Any questions, just shoot because I'm just going to put a W or a L next to each relevant column and the column number that it won or lost on.
2 2 3
2 5 3
1 6 6
3 4 2
6 2 2
1 4 3
3 5 2
6 5 5 W3
2 2 1
6 1 4
6 2 2
2 2 6 L1
3 2 2 W1, L2
1 6 5 W2
2 2 5 L2
6 5 2 W2
4 4 3 W3
1 1 6
1 1 5
6 4 5
2 2 4 W2
6 2 5
4 2 4 L3
4 2 5 L2, L3
4 1 4 W1, L3
5 2 5 W1, L2, L3
5 5 4 L1, W2, L3 <<PERFECT example of where the wins in different columns can bail you out of a nasty run
4 1 1 L1, W3
6 1 2 W1
5 1 5
2 4 2 W2
4 4 3 L2
4 2 1 W2
A real stiff test that session, but still no more than 3 losses in a row
I like the looks of this one Buff.
:thumbsup:
Let's go again! Some new spins
2 3 5
2 1 4
3 3 6
2 1 1
3 5 6 L1, W2
2 3 1 L1
3 3 3 L1, W3 <<again a faltering column (1) is bailed out by another (3)
1 3 5 W1
6 2 2 W2
1 2 6 L2
1 5 3 W2
3 5 5 W1
4 5 3 L2
1 4 2 W2
6 6 1
1 4 1
6 3 4
1 1 4 L1
4 6 1 W1, L3
4 6 2 W3
1 2 4
2 1 6 W1
2 2 3
3 2 5
6 6 4 W2
6 2 6
2 2 4 L2
1 3 6 W2
5 3 5 W3
4 6 5 W2
6 1 1
3 2 1
5 3 5 L3
A much more typical session that with only the one lot of 2 losses showing. Still not sure on progressions etc, but I don't believe in waiting for virtual losses so martingale is outta the question with this one - perhaps just up one each time.
Cheers Sam, yes I'm gonna be testing this one pretty good from now on and see where it takes me
a slower session this one - you get this sometimes when the double streets are moving all over the place. Still, no dangers here ...so far!
3 4 3
4 5 2
2 4 2
5 3 6
5 5 3
3 6 5
1 2 2
3 2 5
1 5 2
2 2 1 W1, W3
1 6 3 W2
1 3 3
2 3 2 L1
2 2 4 L1
5 5 5 W1
1 2 4
3 1 2
6 2 6
6 6 5
6 3 3
1 2 4 W1
3 6 5 W1
4 1 2
6 6 2
4 4 4
3 4 2
3 4 5 W3
2 5 4 W2
5 3 4 W2
3 5 2
5 3 6
5 2 6 W2
Another set of spins, 1 three loss only
6 3 1
5 3 3
4 2 2
4 3 6
4 4 4 W2
2 1 1 W1
2 6 5 L1
4 6 2 L1
2 6 5 L1
6 5 3 W1, W2
2 5 3 L2
6 4 6 W2
6 3 6 L1
3 3 2 W1, W3
4 1 4
5 2 5
4 2 6
5 1 4
1 2 3 W1, L2
2 3 2 W2
1 3 2
3 3 6
2 4 5 W2
4 6 1 W2
4 2 4
5 6 5
6 5 2
2 1 1
5 1 6
1 2 6
4 5 2
1 2 1
6 2 1
So far in all those sessions a max of 3L.
I might just try this one out and see how it goes.
So basically if I understand it correctly we note down numbers like this
1 3 3
2 2 1
2 1 2
1 2 3
And once we see 2 double streets in a row of 4 that's a signal to bet against those 2 DS right?
That's right Sam, let us know how you go and even better, post up your session here! Cheers
Not giving up on such a strong method! This was an exemplary session with just the single loss.
5 6 3
6 1 6
2 5 2
5 4 5
3 4 3
5 6 2
3 1 4
5 4 1 L1
1 2 4 W1
6 4 4
2 2 5 W3
6 1 2 W2
5 3 1
2 5 5
6 4 3
1 3 2
6 4 3
4 4 2
5 6 1 W2, W3
1 2 4
5 5 4
4 5 3
4 3 3
1 2 1 W3
4 3 6
6 1 4 W1
5 4 6
4 5 6
4 3 5 W3
3 4 2
4 3 6
6 5 2 W1
2 3 2
6 6 3
2 2 5
5 3 3
2 5 4
5 5 1
3 2 6 W1
5 6 6
6 3 2
2 3 6
4 3 1
4 3 3
6 5 5
4 2 1
5 1 5
1 3 3
3 3 1
2 4 2
3 4 3
4 5 5 W2
1 3 2
2 5 1
3 6 2
2 4 4
6 5 4
6 1 5
6 5 1
5 1 4
1 1 2 L2
5 2 1 W2
6 5 6
6 6 1
1 5 3
6 1 3
I think I've done it right.
Can you confirm Buff?
Hi Sam, you're getting there, just a matter of tuning your eyes into it! You missed some betting opportunities however:
Quote from: SamNL on Apr 10, 05:24 AM 2015
2 3 2
6 6 3
2 2 5
5 3 3
2 5 4
5 5 1
3 2 6 W1
5 6 6
6 3 2
2 3 6
4 3 1 W3
4 3 3 L2
6 5 5 W2
4 2 1
5 1 5 W1
1 3 3
3 3 1
2 4 2
3 4 3
4 5 5 W2
1 3 2
2 5 1
3 6 2
2 4 4
6 5 4
6 1 5
6 5 1
5 1 4
1 1 2 W1, L2
5 2 1 W2
6 5 6
6 6 1
1 5 3
6 1 3
I think I've done it right.
Can you confirm Buff?
Quote from: buffalowizard on Apr 10, 07:36 AM 2015
Hi Sam, you're getting there, just a matter of tuning your eyes into it! You missed some betting opportunities however:
Thx Buff,
I understand it now.
More spins later today.
Anyone else tested this? Ok, well here's another try
2 3 6
2 5 6
3 3 4
2 3 4
6 3 5 W1, L2, W3
1 2 1 W2
5 3 4 L2
1 4 6 W2
6 2 2
3 1 4
2 4 4
4 3 5
4 6 1
3 1 3
6 2 6
1 2 5
1 6 5
6 2 1
6 2 4 L1, L2
5 4 3 W1, W2
2 3 6
4 4 1
2 5 5
4 4 1
1 4 6 W1
3 1 3 W2
6 4 5
4 2 4 W2
2 5 4
4 6 3
5 5 1
6 2 5
6 6 4
Another winning session, still looks good
Buff, This looks good but are you saying we should be prepared to play for up to 4 or 5 losses. It gets 3 losses pretty regularly so 4 and even 5 are just around the corner. A 4 Line marty gets pretty steep awfully fast. Help us with your idea of a progression please.
GLC
George
That's the brutal truth of 24 number systems - I don't know if I would use a Marty?
Most times, the wins more than double outweigh the losses so something just a little more than a flat bet would do the trick here.
I believe that the first couple of sessions I plucked were really horror runs and the last few Are more 'standard' Of course, you could wait 1 or 2 virtual losses, but its negligible as to how much difference it makes - other than waiting longer to play!
But then there's not a 24 number system anywhere in this forum that won't get 5,6,7 losses in a row.
If it almost wins with a flatbet, then that's about the right odds against us. Here's what I'm afraid of. No matter how many steps in a marty you're willing to risk, there's always a string of losses that you could run into that are 1 loss beyond your maximum bet. If you go for more wins to recover losses, there's always a section of spins that have so few wins vs losses that you just gradually go deeper and deeper in the hole until you finally end up at the same place you did with the marty.
Given both scenarios, a little luck and neither one of the extremes may happen to you or else either one could happen the first time you sit down to play. Pick your poison.
I lean toward the D'Alembert concept over the Martingale concept. With the D'Alembert, if you can stay in the game long enough there's a chance you can come back from a deep hole.
That's why I like the Full TrioPlay concept because if things start going to far in the hole, we start adjusting our bets to mitigate our losses and we always have a stop loss to keep from total disaster.
GLC
Hey Buff,
I haven't forgotten about The Triple Threat idea.
Have been busy with lots of other things lately.
I might be doing some tests with this again and see how it goes.