Wanted to see what this looks like (there's been some success with this)
Pick any ec: Progression: 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5 (stop)
If a win reduce by one unit and start at the beginning of that leg
example: 1,1,2,2,3 (win)
Start at the first 2 leg of the progression.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Same with dozens/columns:
Pick any dozen/column: Progression: 1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4,4,4,5,5,5
If win reduce by one uint and start at the beginning of that leg.
example: 1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,4 (win)
Start at the first leg of 3 and resume.
hey proof,
i havent thoroughly tested it as i am on phone right now. initial check is if u when on 2nd & 3rd bet u are break even?
prog - BR on W/L
1 - +1/-1
1 - 0/-2
2 - 0/-4
2 - -2/-6
which means u need to win on your first bet?
correct me if i am wrng
Hi Proof
Proof with all the methods you've posted, have you ever taken a piece of one and used with another. Do you find certain parts work then fail, so would it be poss to morph different ones to make in to the one you and all us are hopeing to find.
Cheers NTH
which means u need to win on your first bet?-Marvin
You keep playing until in profit, then stop.
Do you find certain parts work then fail, so would it be poss to morph different ones to make in to the one you and all us are hoping to find.-NTH
Correct. I try different triggers on the same group of numbers. Then same trigger on different groups, sometimes playing more than one system when I test (which may become a system)
Thanks Proof, good hunting
Going in the vein of NTH............
What if we took that matrix thing Atlantis posted and used this progression? Not that the thing Atlantis posted is bad or ineffective. Just thinking.
Thanks, Proof.
Sam