You only bet after w-w sequences have formed and play the opposite of the 2nd penultimate outcome.
Might also be used for baccarat.
Examples
========
p
p
p-w(same as two back)
p-w(same as two back ) = trigger to bet AGAINST two back ie: bet on b
b-won+1 Begin tracking again looking for new w-w pattern.
b
p
b-w(same as two back)
p-w(same as two back) = trigger to bet AGAINST two back ie: bet on p
p-won+1 Begin tracking again for new w-w pattern.
b
b
p-L
p-L
p-w
p-w(two ww - trigger to bet AGAINST 2nd penultimate ie: bet on b
b-lost-1 Begin tracking again for new w-w pattern.
b
b
p-L
p-L
p-w
p-w(two ww - trigger to bet AGAINST 2nd penultimate ie: bet on b
p-lost-1 Begin tracking again for new w-w pattern.
r
b
r-w
b-w
b-won+1
r
b
b-L
r-L
r-L
b-L
b-L
b-w
b-w
b-lost-1
b
b
r-L
b-w
r-w
r-won+1
b
r
r-L
b-L
r-w
b-w
r-lost-1
Dutchy advocated using the "penthouse" progression.
A.
Hi Atlantis,
Just did a test of 555 decisions playing as you noted, 285 winners for 51.4%.Just where I thought it would be.Still it is amazing just how long some losing streaks last.Guess that's what they mean when they say "you need a adequate bankroll" .I should add this test was done on 6-deck baccarat shoes. >:D
slow but it looks like a great baccarat bet
Hi!
To do it faster, just play after 2 losses or after 2 wins.
After to losses play for a win.
After 2 wins play for a loss.
It works great!!
Agesta
@Tomla,
Tom, you are right it is very slow,it's like the slow moving tortoise who has decided to" stay on" and get the 26 miles. ;)@Agesta,this looks good and it compliments the regular bet perfectly.I haven't tested it yet but am encouraged by your results.Thanks for your efforts and input. :thumbsup:
yes the dutchie combined with the reverse might be a good thought