I don't know who invented this progression or if it has a name at all. but this it:
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 etc.
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 etc
1 1,5 2 2,5 3 etc.
you could play this in different ways.
a. one step further on a loss and if you win stay there until your next loss
b. further on a loss and continue with the different steps until your in profit again.
maybe this could also be used as some sort of up-as-you-win-progression?
cheers
hans
Thought that before, then realised it can only be done on tables with low values, like
0.50 units or even 0.10units/0.25units.
But, yes it does give U the variance to slow the progression right down
to its absolute lowest/safest values, such that Ur always covering the
Bankroll without too much exposure.
Good post Hans. :thumbsup:
Don't be fooled by numbers. This progression is equal to:
2-3-4-5-6....
Any one who attempt to play even money bet shold never increase the first three bets 1 1 1 after that is a matter if you are going to be agressive or not or use different stages of attacks.
Quote from: ego on Nov 26, 11:18 AM 2010
Any one who attempt to play even money bet shold never increase the first three bets 1 1 1 .
Why you say that?
Quote from: Kav on Nov 30, 06:49 PM 2010
Why you say that?
For exampel when you run a even money bet wich pass 500 000 you will notice there is no need to increase the first three bets to gain a win.
Quote from: ego on Dec 01, 12:55 AM 2010
For example when you run a even money bet wich pass 500 000 you will notice there is no need to increase the first three bets to gain a win.
I don't understand what you mean by "no need". By the same thinking there is "no need" to use a positive progression in the first place. You could just flat bet.
Positive progressions have specific advantages and disadvantages. I still can't see why, if one chose to use a positive progression approach, one should not increase the first 3 bets.
Quote from: Kav on Dec 01, 01:29 PM 2010
I don't understand what you mean by "no need". By the same thinking there is "no need" to use a positive progression in the first place. You could just flat bet.
Positive progressions have specific advantages and disadvantages. I still can't see why, if one chose to use a positive progression approach, one should not increase the first 3 bets.
The why is simpel and I am not sure what you say or state - my experience passing 800 000 trails using even money position and end up with a positive gain is to get as many attempts as possibal to coup with bad swings and recoup.
I find using a humbel progression at levels or a long not agressive progression does not fail as quick as others do - wich all my testing in the past indicates.
Sure you can have a different experience or other opinion - but that is what I find out.
And regarding flat-betting so am i the only one on public internet wich have explain easy simpel rules with simulation software and show the public how to reach 3 std flat-betting with sampels of 10 000 wich no one else has done.
Many pepole use the word flat-betting and have no knowledge about it at all.
Cheers