This system is for those who like flatbet most.
Step 1
Start betting on the last high or low for 2 spins(Don't switch bet if you lose until the cycle is done). If you hit anytime move on to step 2. If you lose both spins, move on to step 2.
Step 2
Start betting the last hit dozen for three spins(Don't switch bet if you lose until the cycle is done). If you hit anytime move on to step 3. If you lose all three bets, move on to step 3
Step 3
Start betting on the last two double lines for 3 spins(Don't switch bet if you lose until the cycle is done). If you hit anytime, move on to step 4. If you lose all three bets, move on to step 4
Step 4
Start betting the column that hit last for three spins(Don't switch bet if you lose until the cycle is done). If you hit anytime, startover at step 1. If you lose all three bets, startover at step 1.
Here is an example:
Bankroll
6 Bet low next spin 0
24 Lost, bet low again -1
18 won, move to step 2, bet middle dozen 0
36 lost, bet middle dozen again, -1
21 won, move to step 3, bet line 31-36 and line 19-24 +1
5 lost, bet line 31-36 and line 19-24 again -1
22 won, move to step 4, bet column B +3
32 lost, bet column B again +2
15, lost, startover at step 1 +1
I have tested it in RX with 1000 RNG spins and it ended positive.
OBS, this test was without zero.
I will do testing with live spins soon.
Thanks for sharing your Cycle approach with us dear Fripper.
Keep us posted on your live spins tests on it :thumbsup:
Yes I too look forward to your Live Spins Test Fripper :thumbsup:
I tried this method at ladbrokes rng , I managed to get into profit a few times but soon so the losses come. Once the balance gets down the amount of time needed to recover can be massive. My opinion is that this is without doubt no good for the player who wants to win..
I lost a Ã,£200 bankroll in about 15 minutes playing with Ã,£5 chips .
Quote from: Kingspin on Oct 08, 06:21 AM 2010
I tried this method at ladbrokes rng , I managed to get into profit a few times but soon so the losses come. Once the balance gets down the amount of time needed to recover can be massive. My opinion is that this is without doubt no good for the player who wants to win..
I lost a Ã,£200 bankroll in about 15 minutes playing with Ã,£5 chips .
As you can see in the graf I attached, the down periods is sometimes around 100 spins and my test was without a zero. Consider that.
this is a little tip for anyone playing rng which i don,t reccomend but if you do only play on the flash casino.download mozerlla firefox and then get the add on for better privacy.every time you win a small amount log out then go on the firefox and click on better privacy in tools then press the remove ALL LSO,s button.this way the onboard software of the casino your playing on doesn,t remember your betting stlye.this only works in flash casino not downloaded software and does help a lot.it also remove all flash cookies etc from sites you,ve been to thats how they remember you.it could be most of you know about this but it might help some who don,t.your cycle bet is interesting
Quote from: Kingspin on Oct 08, 06:21 AM 2010
I tried this method at ladbrokes rng , I managed to get into profit a few times but soon so the losses come. Once the balance gets down the amount of time needed to recover can be massive. My opinion is that this is without doubt no good for the player who wants to win..
I lost a Ã,£200 bankroll in about 15 minutes playing with Ã,£5 chips .
Kingspin, as you may know, if you flatbet it goes up and down. It's like every other system, the thing is that you want to find something that goes up more then down.
Thanks for your interest and advice dear commonsense1968. For the record I am open-minded about RNG and Live wheels. I don't prefer any of them anymore, I play at the table I feel like that time.
I just tested 8st 100 spin sessions. Live spins without zero.
The results:
1st = -65 units (very bad session)
2e = +17 units
3e = +6 units
4e = +28 units
5e = -20 units
6e = +6 units
7e = +3 units
8e = -24 units
So far have RNG results been much better. Will continue with some more testing, feel free to test and put results here.
Can someone please tell me why I get these results in RX? :smile:
A harder session.. :o