I found an anomaly that has not lost
Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method
-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further
I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this
Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right
Example
311
Next 3 we have
232
Next 3 we have
113
So
311
232
113
Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll
Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again
This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back
It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random
Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me
No long wait time
We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins
Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.
Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.
I will post tests ive done tomorrow
rg i have been looking at this way back around the 60th page of grass roots it does show promise but be careful using a progression it will BITE YOU
clever way of interpreting it ,i will check some spins
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 16, 08:50 PM 2016
I found an anomaly that has not lost
Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method
Hi! I beleave it was a mistake posting it here if it works. Should have kept it for yourself. But, hey, thanks for sharing. I find it very interesting and will try it after I am finished testing my own tweak.
Simon.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 16, 08:50 PM 2016
I found an anomaly that has not lost
Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method
-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further
I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this
Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right
Example
311
Next 3 we have
232
Next 3 we have
113
So
311
232
113
Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll
Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again
This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back
It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random
Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me
No long wait time
We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins
Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.
Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.
I will post tests ive done tomorrow
I think that the magic, or the value in any of this line of thinking or technique has to do
with things running in trends. Like uniques, repeats, whatever you're trapping on.
So the concept of shuffling the deck, or using information that is back a bit in the
results, gets you out of, or in a transition from what trends were just happening.
I think that's the value of it. We never seem to be able to identify what is actually happening
at the moment, so why not let the results work it out on their own.
Not sure that this is the perfect solution. But I feel stronger in the structure of what I
just said, the more I think about it.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 16, 08:50 PM 2016
I found an anomaly that has not lost
Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method
-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further
I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this
Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right
Example
311
Next 3 we have
232
Next 3 we have
113
So
311
232
113
Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll
Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again
This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back
It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random
Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me
No long wait time
We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins
Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.
Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.
I will post tests ive done tomorrow
I have one question.
Pg 231 in zumma (just for an example)
3 1 2
2 1 1
2 3 3
Next 3 play against 3 2 2.
2 3 0 is the next 3. Do you only use the 1st row to play?
Since you have 2 3 0, do you take the 1st row and play against 2 2 2?
Thanks
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Jan 16, 08:50 PM 2016
I found an anomaly that has not lost
Been testing it for a few weeks. Didnt wanna post it cause i didnt wanna deal with BS. Lately posting ideas here is an uphill battle, but i digress. But i do have a fan club privately through PM so here is the method
-If you do not belive in 24 number bets read no further
-if you do not believe in matrixes read no further
-if you do not believe in waiting read no further
I was scanning my grassroots tests and developed this
Write the dozens as they show in rows of 3 as they come.....left to right
Example
311
Next 3 we have
232
Next 3 we have
113
So
311
232
113
Each column is its own game. We bet vertically......each column separate bankroll
Column 1 we bet 321 wont happen again
Column 2 we bet 131 wont happen again
Column 3 we bet 123 wont happen again
This is no where near a rollin basis. This is against 9 spins back
It works and i dont know why. Well i assume its because the wheel wont spit out an identical pattern every 9 spins, its random
Havent had a loss yet with 139. Im a risk taker i like 139, sue me
No long wait time
We can bet right away if we go by past 9 spins
Any negativity just shut up, dont want to hear it, just move on blissfully to another thread. This is the notepad im sharing an idea, period.
Actually i take that back. I welcome negativity. Requirements for negativity in this thread: 1) post a test 2) provide actual spins of that test. This way we have a basis for the negative remarks.
I will post tests ive done tomorrow
Sorry. I get it.
write dozens as they show left to right in rows of 3, each columns is own game
columns A rows 1, 2, and 3. we have:
1
2
3
so in columns A we bet for 123 not to repeat
1
2
2
has occured, no repeat.....needs MM
essentially this is against 9 back
if playing with 1 3 9 progression stop that series on a win in that column
if flat betting: bet against the dozen 9 back and stop at +5 units. at +5 units switch tables or stop before the house edge catches up
Quote from: SimonZed1 on Jan 17, 12:14 AM 2016
Hi! I beleave it was a mistake posting it here if it works. Should have kept it for yourself. But, hey, thanks for sharing. I find it very interesting and will try it after I am finished testing my own tweak.
Simon.
Why are you here if you feel this way!!!
-Celtic