This one came about me playing and testing some random bets and to my suprise it worked better than i thought...it's 15 numbers bet, Flatbet. (For live-wheels only!)
Procedure: Use the function that all roulette tables have to bet one number and it's two neighbours-- Bet the last 3 numbers and it's two neighbours from the history of spins (NOT the current number hit, but starting with the second newest number hit)... 5+5+5 numbers bet. if any one number is already covered by a bet, bet the next oldest from the history of spins, (until 15 numbers bet) Do two spins, then STOP, then begin anew.
First test was played with 1u bets, (wingoal +100u, stoploss -100u)
7/10 Games won
(and that is good stats being FLATBET imo)
Yep, very good!
Try 2 times - it will come or it will not...
No progression to take you in wrong direction!
Thanks Ig!
Quote from: nextyear on Mar 15, 02:01 PM 2016
Yep, very good!
Try 2 times - it will come or it will not...
No progression to take you in wrong direction!
Thanks Ig!
Thanks ;) you mean no progression will take you to the
right direction?? ;D
Hopefully, yes!
But surely we'll be more in control.
Just drive safely!
While you are on the road, it is more likely to arrive where you're heading.
Just had a strange idea........
What if you could build an Ignatus Martingale?
How it works :
- Play a method for 10 games max
- If lose, then double next bankroll with different method
- If win, then play another 10 games with different method
Quote from: thelaw on Mar 15, 04:29 PM 2016
Just had a strange idea........
What if you could build an Ignatus Martingale?
How it works :
- Play a method for 10 games max
- If lose, then double next bankroll with different method
- If win, then play another 10 games with different method
Yes, that may be a good idea, if you have the bankroll required, but then I don't play for real just yet!
Playing for fun now @dublinbet...more testing is needed
about the progression, i don't think martingale is a good idea, nowadays i like flatbet or positive progression more or else +1/-1 progression
im testing this one with positive progression right now
Quote from: ignatus on Mar 15, 04:39 PM 2016
Yes, that may be a good idea, if you have the bankroll required, but then I don't play for real just yet!
Playing for fun now @dublinbet...more testing is needed
about the progression, i don't think martingale is a good idea, nowadays i like flatbet or positive progression more or else +1/-1 progression
im testing this one with positive progression right now
I agree about the Marty........might work flat.......or perhaps a parlay.
I like a progression for bankroll management instead of using it in the method. So if you lost your 1000unit bank after 10 games, then you move to a progression for the entire bankroll. I call it a nested progression.........eventually stacking enough of them will win. :thumbsup:
Just had 3 losses in a row playing live @dublinbet, so perhaps this was not such a good idea...sry :-[