Poll
Question:
,
Option 1: ,
votes: 0
Option 2: .
votes: 1
link:://winningatroulette2.blogspot.co.uk/
and it uses maths
good find
What do you think of his method were you spin for 37 spins, record the unseen numbers and then play all of the unseen numbers for another 37spins?
this one should work-----
Like how Tomla? go for one hit with a progression? then track the next 37 spins and bet the unhits?
i would go for 2-3 early hits then retrack
flat or +1/-1?
They will hit like he said, its law of the third.. when they will hit/repeat is another matter!
Interesting, but not fool proof I think. Snake oil salesman.
Quote from: button on May 03, 04:06 AM 2016Snake oil salesman.
Not necessarily.
If you look at KTF sheets most games have 60 spins, at the bottom of box 51-60 i mark how many non-hit have hit. Some time ago we added a lot of the 60 spin value of non-hit and it showed an aveerage of 30.5 non-hit, i personally drop the .5 so gives 30 non-hit in 60 spins.
So at spin 40 we usually see 15 non-hit plus the non-hit in spins 1-10. Lets use the perfect bubble world,that does not happen, but lets use the 24 non-hit in 37 cycle, but KTF uses 40 spins but 24 non-hit in 40 spins happens.
With 24 non-hit by spin 40, what do we usually see at spin 60, 30 non-hit.
If the example of 24 is accepted that would mean potentially we could see half the remaining 13 non-hit by 60th spin.
Just from observing info from the sheets. Its all there to see, no math just good old pen and paper.
Not working because of repeated numbers, to say again "repeated numbers" every spin is first spin, no past spins, no future spins it is always one spin and every spin is first spin.
Quote from: MumboJumbo on May 03, 08:00 AM 2016
Not working because of repeated numbers, to say again "repeated numbers" every spin is first spin, no past spins, no future spins it is always one spin and every spin is first spin.
(link:://sustainablejill.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Ostrich-with-head-in-sand-illustration.jpg)
eh..
Well there's no such thing as using 'past spins'. Present and future spins ? Good idea !
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well there's no such thing as using 'past spins'. Present and future spins ? Good idea !
Well. Its all the same crap. There is no such thing as using present and future. Show me a good proof that it works. I can post a graph in my signature and say this is what past spins can do to your bank roll. Very nice proof.
Quote from: Foolwise on May 03, 08:26 AM 2016I can post a graph in my signature and say this is what past spins can do to your bank roll. Very nice proof.
I didn't post it in my signature as a proof - Hmm. I wonder what the appropriate 'proof' would be ?
Maybe a Fields Medal ? No wait, I'm over 40. Maybe I could just make the TurboGenius Medal and award it to myself. :)
Quote from: Foolwise on May 03, 08:26 AM 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Well there's no such thing as using 'past spins'. Present and future spins ? Good idea !
Well. Its all the same crap. There is no such thing as using present and future. Show me a good proof that it works. I can post a graph in my signature and say this is what past spins can do to your bank roll. Very nice proof.
Show me your face on rouletteplayers.org, where are you? You are nowhere, like past and future spins you not exist in roulette world. I am the proof.
TURBOGENIUS
There are 37 nunbers on a euro roulette wheel, Do you think that there has ever been 37 unique numbers in 37 spins?
Or even 24 unique numbers in 24 spins?
Really doubtful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Show me your face on rouletteplayers.org, where are you? You are nowhere, like past and future spins you not exist in roulette world. I am the proof.
I can only laugh at the proof. Play some more spins my friend. Let me see where your 0.1% profit after 1000 odd spins take you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>No wait, I'm over 40. Maybe I could just make the TurboGenius Medal and award it to myself.
Sure the 40 years have taught you how to dodge questions. If the question is not clear, let me ask you again. Where is the proof that playing based on present and future spins work. You can all day play with words on present, future and math beat math etc, but you will always end up where the house edge catches you.
100 spins, 1000 spins, 10 000 spins, 100 000 spins, 1000 000 spins, I will always be in profit, so I am the proof. But you are nowhere a proof of not existence.
Quote from: JSG240592 on May 03, 09:30 AM 2016
TURBOGENIUS
There are 37 nunbers on a euro roulette wheel, Do you think that there has ever been 37 unique numbers in 37 spins?
Or even 24 unique numbers in 24 spins?
Really doubtful.
25! My system is based on trying to exploit this.
Quote from: JSG240592 on May 03, 09:30 AM 2016
TURBOGENIUS
There are 37 nunbers on a euro roulette wheel, Do you think that there has ever been 37 unique numbers in 37 spins?
Or even 24 unique numbers in 24 spins?
Really doubtful.
25 different numbers after 25 Spins in 6 different 37-spins-group out of 1,040,000 Groups
26 after 26 spins in 2 groups
27 after 27 spins in 1 group
Quote from: winkel on May 03, 10:59 AM 201625 different numbers after 25 Spins in 6 different 37-spins-group out of 1,040,000 Groups
26 after 26 spins in 2 groups
27 after 27 spins in 1 group
See just ask the Guvnor, hes been there an done it.
Long live Professor!
Quote from: JSG240592 on May 03, 09:30 AM 2016
TURBOGENIUS
There are 37 nunbers on a euro roulette wheel, Do you think that there has ever been 37 unique numbers in 37 spins?
Or even 24 unique numbers in 24 spins?
Really doubtful.
I'm pretty sure we agree here.
No, there won't be 37 unique numbers in 37 spins - and no -
there won't be 1 number that repeats 37 times.
Hence - random has limits and works within a set of it's own rules making it predictable - math beats a math game..... it's that simple.
Quote from: TurboGenius on May 03, 02:42 PM 2016I'm pretty sure we agree here.
No, there won't be 37 unique numbers in 37 spins - and no -
there won't be 1 number that repeats 37 times.
funny,the human mind
My mother (bless her, I always use her in a "even my mum would get it" example) would not bat an eyelid if 37 numbers came out in 37 spins, but even she would think number 12 hitting 37 times looked wrong. But they have no chance of happening.
Mr Gaussian says so