User CommonSense1969 has been banned, he -disrespectfully to his followers and readers- wiped his section clean and removed all the interactions.
Obviously he doesn't want to take part of the forum's sharing dynamics hence his section has been de-listed and his account banned.
As a final point to "turn this page", if readers want it, I can try to rebuild the thread by merging the deleted posts one by one in a topic where I am the moderator (all the posts are still in our forum's recycle bin).
Kind regards.
Victor
Goodo.
I picked him as undesirable a while back when he had the gall to refer to some of his readers as 'donkeys'.
And he played tease-but-not-tell far too well. A pity so many were sucked in by him!
At this point I believe the community is pretty much "stuffed" with hinters
(always behaving a la Charles, they all have the mythical consistent winning bet and want to "prepare us" and give us hint to more hints and clues to more clues to death... please!).
Thanks for your message.
Personally I would like you to rebuild the thread if that is what you are suggesting but do others agree?
I try to keep an open mind and am always grateful for help if it can be proven to be constructive. Also I am interested in work that overlaps with my research on what is a fabulously exciting subject.
Over to you for any judgements though - you have seen much more of this than me and I think your Forum is currently a very stimulating and exciting vehicle for worthwhile research.
Cheers
XXVV
Just clearing, I still think you are genuine in your quest and if you wish to genuinely re-take the bets our forum's pages are open :)
Whatever the user CommonSense did is only to be accounted to him, you and his readers/followers have nothing to do with it and our sharing place is still open for further (open) debate on the techniques.
Victor
P.S: topic is going to be rebuilt to the Gambling & framework section.
Cheers!
Quote from: VLS on Oct 09, 10:10 PM 2010
At this point I believe the community is pretty much "stuffed" with hinters
(always behaving a la Charles, they all have the mythical consistent winning bet and want to "prepare us" and give us hint to more hints and clues to more clues to death... please!).
Always fairly easy to see through them.There is always a certain pattern that they follow. .I suppose though you have to give them the benefit of the doubt.But sooner or later they tend to trip themselves up.I always feel sorrow for the people that they lead into their little games.
Kudos to you though Victor for keeping this forum clean. You always do a tremendous job :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
Good job Victor, I think you made the right decision. :thumbsup:
You know what's common sense? That if you want your roulette system to be peer-reviewed and want to obtain feedback on it, you simply post it and get your feedback right away as we are an open forum for Roulette Systems.
No need to hint for long periods of time nor play games with people.
On the other hand, if you don't want people to know, just don't post about it at all.
That's just common sense.
Couldn't be simpler, really :)
Topic merged and restored here:
link:://rouletteforum.cc/roulette-and-gambling-framework/common-sense-betting/ (link:://rouletteforum.cc/roulette-and-gambling-framework/common-sense-betting/)
...When the person behind the common sense nick realizes all the posts he has taken the time to remove are merged back, he isn't going to be very happy. He actually took the time to manually hit the 'remove post' button over 150 times to destroy the thread in full (talk about intent).
Good thing is admins can batch-merge posts to rebuild a topic easier :)
Make as you wish from the new rebuilt topic!
Regards.
Quote from: VLS on Oct 10, 05:15 AM 2010
You know what's common sense? That if you want your roulette system to be peer-reviewed and want to obtain feedback on it, you simply post it and get your feedback right away as we are an open forum for Roulette Systems.
No need to hint for long periods of time nor play games with people.
On the other hand, if you don't want people to know, just don't post about it at all.
That's just common sense.
Couldn't be simpler, really :)
Exactly how I see it. There will always be delusional people out there though. Speaking of delusional... I just watched the movie: Who is Clark Rockefeller? Now that guy is delusional.
Sorry gone off topic here. A must see though...lol ;D
lol :D
Nice one Vic !
Thanks for restoring this material. I will continue with my exciting train of research and update from time to time with results and progress.
As I stated earlier I am grateful for what has already been presented and discussed on this thread.
My attitude is always to accentuate the positives and results speak for themselves.
Really appreciate the efforts by Victor.
Cheers
XXVV
Quote from: XXVV on Oct 10, 11:54 AM 2010
My attitude is always to accentuate the positives and results speak for themselves.
That's the attitude! May your efforts bring something good for you and fellow readers/members.
Quote from: XXVV on Oct 10, 11:54 AM 2010
Really appreciate the efforts
Thanks and your sharing efforts are appreciated too.
Cheers!
Yes thanx Victor for bring a correct state of flux with regard to this matter.
One Q, are u able to assertain from ur admin info, where abouts the said commonsense2010 monolith came from, location wise??
UK, or US, real email address or public entity??
C
i believe in testing
I am surprised and disappointed that private information has been published in the public domain. Too much information.
Why this witch hunt with regard to this CS identity and why refer to this individual who clearly has considerable knowledge as a 'monolith'.
Why is there such negativity toward any views or ideas that originate from or are compatible with Win3million.com on this Forum - I bet you delete the reference here.
Or any reference to the valuable methods and ideas published by CEH - again I expect a deletion here.
Would you like to publish my name and location? I am sure no one is interested but why this attitude toward CS?
I have no particular agenda but am really disturbed that in my view you have breached a privacy principle.
For those who are prepared to work with an open mind the thread initiated by CS has fantastic potential, and for those who have made any effort, and even followed some of the added thoughts by other posters on that thread including my own, this will be apparent.
Worthwhile total answers will never be presented by anyone
'on a plate' ready to consume. Life just doesn't work like that.
Hello XXVV, When someone makes faults to be banned any "honor contract" or any "trust expectation" is broken ipso-facto.
"Abide by law so that law abides along with you."
Any tacit contract is weighted 50/50 equally on both sides.
Sort of me going to your house, peeing on your furniture and later demand and expect your utmost respect towards myself.
The minute I pissed inside your house, the very minute I lost all my respects rights.
Believe me, nobody is going to go to his house because I published he's from UK.
Yet I have chosen to remove the ISP's location, just to please any "too close" suspicion, although I very much doubt he's the only person with internet access in his city to be identified just for that.
Kind of:
- Where's ken from?
- Milwaukee
- Damn it! that's the single guy in town with the ethernet cable and PC! :D
...You know what I mean.
Kind regards.
Quote from: VLS on Oct 27, 04:24 PM 2010
Hello XXVV, When someone makes faults to be banned any "honor contract" or any "trust expectation" is broken ipso-facto.
"Abide by law so that law abides along with you."
Any tacit contract is weighted 50/50 equally on both sides.
Sort of me going to your house, peeing on your furniture and later demand and expect your utmost respect towards myself.
The minute I pissed inside your house, the very minute I lost all my respects rights.
Believe me, nobody is going to go to his house because I published he's from UK.
Yet I have chosen to remove the ISP's location, just to please any "too close" suspicion, although I very much doubt he's the only person with internet access in his city to be identified just for that.
Kind of:
- Where's ken from?
- Milwaukee
- Damn it! that's the single guy in town with the ethernet cable and PC! :D
...You know what I mean.
Kind regards.
Beautifully written Vic :thumbsup:
Thanks
Of course I appreciate that.
Someone needed to comment nevertheless.
Cheers
XXVV
Quote from: chrisbis on Oct 10, 02:45 PM 2010
Yes thanks Victor for bring a correct state of flux with regard to this matter.
One Q, are you able to assertain from your admin info, where abouts the said commonsense2010 monolith came from, location wise??
UK, or US, real email address or public entity??
C
U know, after i wrote this text, i did wonder how it would be received by the community.
I was genuinely surprised that i had a response from the forum admin.
Now i'll tell u Y i asked the question.
Im new to the forum, but not new to forums per-say.
When u have been in a forum for a while, u get to know the various persomalities of each member.
(continued on next post, as i can't type any more at this moment in time, must Pm Victor about the problem i am having with the text page of the posts.
Quote from: XXVV
Of course I appreciate that.
I'm glad to hear that.
Quote from: chrisbis on Oct 27, 04:52 PM 2010
must Pm Victor about the problem I am having with the text page of the posts.
Fire away, and include your web browser's name and version + operative system.
I'm always willing to assist in whatever I can.
Regards.
I asked the 'location, country and Internet connection, because usually when someone comes along,
has 'amazing ideas', posts in writing that not easily read, and seems to hide behind the corrosive attitude towards others posters, and gets banned, they have a hidden agenda!
I was curious to see where this person came from for reference reasons,
and to see if this was more akin to a incendiary device been planted in the forum, and it was bound to go off in the forums virtual face.
I was away when the bomb went off, so i had a lot of catching up to do, in understanding the 'what, the where, and most definitely the why'
I wasn't to witch hunt, to search out, or get the right of reply,
I was just curious.
A fellow UK....................With those attributes......... Definitely a monolith