This is not an insult but as usual...cry me a river.
We all (including AP) should advance over the years with roulette. Knowing more year after year...trial and error etc.
I see Denzie has jumped into "better" (dont know what word to use?) ideas as of late. The fact that Denzie and I dont get along is irrelevant at best...I give credit where its due.
Anyways, I see your thread today regarding law of the third (a waste of time BTW). Question being, we'll say over the last THREE years, what type of method were you interested in 3 years ago COMPARED to now?
If you are at "law of the third " today....what do you feel was a dumb idea 3 years ago?
Honest question.
Ken
Trying ideas posted by you
Quote from: nottophammer on Sep 10, 07:58 PM 2016
Trying ideas posted by you
You know what they say about comedy? Its a last resort.
Ken
Just got to friends
Gonna eat. Be back later
Ken
I have no shame
When i started roulette it was because of a BIG win
Well for me it was big
I was with friends in vegas. Had $25 on 9 and it hit
Luggage in hand. Havent checked in yet
Amazing feeling
After that i researched systems
I began playing the "james bond" method. Did well.
Silly method. Yes
I have no shame. I have always been interested in betting systems because i hate random betting
-Never money i cant afford to lose
-Never take it too seriously
This game is negative expectation
You can call it hot numbers, a method, a system, a flap jack, it doesnt matter. No matter how the chips got on the table they are at the mercy of random ( :thumbsup:)
As of late i test different ideas i have against real spins. Looking for "rarer" events
Anyone can tell me its a waste of time. But who are they to tell me that? Its my time. Its my money. And its a GAME
Theres no right or wrong way to play a casino game
I play systems. I use progressions. But most importantly i play for fun.
I like the scene. I like the atmosphere. I like casinos.
I like the law of the 3rd idea and will try to use it
To answer your question
3 years ago i didnt think any idea was dumb
I love reading old methods on this forum
I like the strive people have
Utmost respect for proof and ignatus
Keep em coming
If the forum was centered around ideas it would be better
AP players could post their ideas
System players can post their ideas
Method players can post their ideas O0
Without attacking eachother
AP players should respect system players. If thats how they want to play.
When i look back a few years
I see a method from you
Which escalated to betting 36 numbers at once
Six double streeets
Your method
I can link if you want
Was not a good method
But i liked that ken. One of the crowd. Not a caleb puppet
(link:s://media.giphy.com/media/U7IaMMFoVwo7u/giphy.gif)
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 10, 09:38 PM 2016
Six double streeets
Your method
You're making MY POINT, I hope you dont? I dont test that today (I never did play it, I can provide link if you wish?) If I'm not testing it today, why?
You said >>
I began playing the "james bond" method. So in those three years, you have *PROGRESSED* from the James Bond method, now to the law of the third, correct?
My point, there is NOT MUCH in between there in terms of ADVANCING.
Ken
Quote from: MrJ on Sep 11, 10:29 AM 2016
You're making MY POINT, I hope you dont? I dont test that today (I never did play it, I can provide link if you wish?) If I'm not testing it today, why?
You said >>
I began playing the "james bond" method. So in those three years, you have *PROGRESSED* from the James Bond method, now to the law of the third, correct?
My point, there is NOT MUCH in between there in terms of ADVANCING.
Ken
Glad we got that ironed out
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 11, 10:41 AM 2016
You are very helpful
He's not being helpful, IMHO he's being a smart arse.
Steve recently publicly accused me of being a smart arse on this forum, (I can link it if you want) then withheld my response through moderation because I'm a newb.
Let's see if he witholds this too.. says a lot to me if he does.
Quote from: Taotie on Sep 12, 07:58 AM 2016
He's not being helpful, IMHO he's being a smart arse.
Steve recently publicly accused me of being a smart arse on this forum, (I can link it if you want) then withheld my response through moderation because I'm a newb.
Let's see if he witholds this too.. says a lot to me if he does.
It was me who withheld it because you said that you like being a smart arse in the post and you are on moderate because its a good bet you are Skakus and here to stir shit
A bit like your above post :o
Quote from: Taotie on Sep 12, 07:58 AM 2016
He's not being helpful, IMHO he's being a smart arse.
Steve recently publicly accused me of being a smart arse on this forum, (I can link it if you want) then withheld my response through moderation because I'm a newb.
Let's see if he witholds this too.. says a lot to me if he does.
I know hes being a smart alec
My "you are very helpful" response was sarcasm
The belittling/condescending atitude that MrJ adopted from sister Caleb is a passive aggresive personality trait