Tried something new, that seems to work pretty well. It's an EC bet, played with a positive progression.
First i'll explain the concept of "Tripleknots"
A tripleknot, what i call, a series of TWO switches between R/B, after a series of RR.. or BB..(see pic) Why they are special imo is because a RR or BB are already TWO. but a RB is only ONE that is; RRRB
A RR and BB can never be ONE, but BBBR can be ONE.
so, this is the trigger A formation of a Tripleknot; after a series (two or more) of RR.. or BB.. a switch of color, then bet ONCE that a TripleKnot will be formed, then STOP (and wait for a new trigger)
Progression: Positive. After a WIN bet 2u,(for the Next trigger) after a LOSS back to 1u.
Moneymanagement: 20% (or less) Wingoal, Stoploss -20% of bankroll.
Playing with 1u bets, minimum bankroll 100u, wingoal +20u stoploss -20u
Playing with 5u bets, minimum bankroll 500u, wingoal +100u stoploss -100u
Playing with 25u bets, minimum bankroll 2500u, wingoal +500u stoploss -500u
==================================
First test played with 25u bets.
3/3 Games won
Quote from: ignatus on Sep 16, 02:14 PM 2016
Tried something new, that seems to work pretty well. It's an EC bet, played with a positive progression.
First i'll explain the concept of "Tripleknots"
A tripleknot, what i call, a series of TWO switches between R/B, after a series of RR.. or BB..(see pic) Why they are special imo is because a RR or BB are already TWO. but a RB is only ONE that is; RRRB
A RR and BB can never be ONE, but BBBR can be ONE.
so, this is the trigger A formation of a Tripleknot; after a series (two or more) of RR.. or BB.. a switch of color, then bet ONCE that a TripleKnot will be formed, then STOP (and wait for a new trigger)
Progression: Positive. After a WIN bet 2u,(for the Next trigger) after a LOSS back to 1u.
Moneymanagement: 20% (or less) Wingoal, Stoploss -20% of bankroll.
Playing with 1u bets, minimum bankroll 100u, wingoal +20u stoploss -20u
Playing with 5u bets, minimum bankroll 500u, wingoal +100u stoploss -100u
Playing with 25u bets, minimum bankroll 2500u, wingoal +500u stoploss -500u
==================================
First test played with 25u bets.
3/3 Games won
So you're looking for a "single" after any amount of repeats?
Like RRRBR (you het for red at the end, making B a single"?)
If so, this is my extension of the NLE (nice little earner), looking for
the singles rather than the double/triples.
Am I right?
Quote from: mogul397 on Sep 16, 02:39 PM 2016
So you're looking for a "single" after any amount of repeats?
Like RRRBR (you het for red at the end, making B a single"?)
If so, this is my extension of the NLE (nice little earner), looking for
the singles rather than the double/triples.
Am I right?
"Like RRRBR (you het for red at the end, making B a single"?)"
YES, but i only bet ONCE then STOP. (That's the difference). These "TripleKnots" as i call them are very common, and i had good results so far,
Well that is what I'm talking about.
I am finding this, as with most methods that they come out about
equal. Same with the NLE with doubles and triples. Comes out about
even, sometimes one better than the other and some times long
runs of one or the other.
People (bleep being the author) claims that he plays and wins all the
time. Now he and most people use the D'alenbert. I like that method,
but it scares me. It leaves you hanging out to dry.
Thoughts?