Hello everybody, I'm new on the forum.
I would like to explain my last way of playing roulette.
It's a simple system and its giving me nice results, but before i loss all my BR i will ask your help to test this system.
I started with 200u BR and play the following sequence without stop, if loss i use a martingale (1,2,4,8,16,32….) if hit reset to 1u.
The sequence is: RBRRNN. if win or loss always continue without stop it.
My BR from 200u is now at 750u. I never been more than 64u bet, usually its hit less than 4 loss in a row.
Awaiting for your good opinions. ;)
Omar.
You need to explain your method in more detail. How do you bet for the NN?
You are playing martingale on colors
Very dangerous
I know the good feeling though. I went an entire month making over $100 a day using martingale. Hit and run
Until one day i lost all my profit. Luckily it was casino money and not my money.
Unless by grace of god the bet selection you are using will suffice
If you are playing this way use disposable money......
What is thr NN in your sequence?
RG, you actually played Martingale for real? :twisted: :lol: :sad2:
Quote from: falkor2k15 on Sep 19, 07:37 AM 2016
RG, you actually played Martingale for real? :twisted: :lol: :sad2:
For an entire month on baccarat
When i was a newbie
Thought i was going to be rich. Till that one day. I cut my losses and walked away even.
I have a lot of silver (i collect silver bullion)
Cashed some in to go play and the little bit i cashed in went far lol
I have a bellagio one ounce silver round. Its sweet
I think all newbies start with marty. I dont judge
Sorry for the type mistake.
The sequence is RBRRBB without stopping, even if Zero comes… Continue with that sequence and double your bet if loss until you win. Even if you win continue with your sequence.
Till now, i reach incredible results.
I know that martingale is very dangerous thats why I'm asking your help to test before they cut my legs.
Now my BR in 1127u (initially was 200u).
On my last session max. exposure has been 31u.
I also tried it with a D'alembert and looks very powerful.
Obviously we need to test more.
Omar
Omar don't you think people tried that? What do you think was the result?
Heed the warning
One day it will lose
However
I wish you the best. When it bust i hope you are still in the plus
Good luck
If you enjoy it then keep on
With disposable money please
Quote from: Omarcox on Sep 19, 09:39 AM 2016Obviously we need to test more.
form an orderly queue :o
Quote from: Turner on Sep 19, 04:51 PM 2016
form an orderly queue :o
(link:s://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTKLvJXZClSksIpqKyLXar5TjRG4HB3RQo3164hEGPuwTwbA1iw)
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 19, 07:39 AM 2016I have a bellagio one ounce silver round. Its sweet
DAMN! We were looking why we had a shortage on silver. Guess I shouldn't have fired the staff... O well...
Now I know who's gonna face charges!
PS: On the main topic... please listen to all the members here telling you not to play simple marty. You can check it out on your own on testing sites like testmystrategy or at RX Roulette.
Lol
The bellagio has the best buffet
Been a dozen times
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 19, 07:39 AM 2016
For an entire month on baccarat
When i was a newbie
Thought i was going to be rich. Till that one day. I cut my losses and walked away even.
I have a lot of silver (i collect silver bullion)
Cashed some in to go play and the little bit i cashed in went far lol
I have a bellagio one ounce silver round. Its sweet
I think all newbies start with marty. I dont judge
So your loss was greater than your entire win?
I have been dabbling looking at a 5 step party with the NLE
sequences. Depends on how far you chase it.
Also, one of the things that seems to be the worst is to play
a repetitive sequence. Of course it's going to come out.
it was a long time ago, mogul
I did not lose any money i do not believe...... i had a stop loss, but it went south
i have no problem admitting then when i was a newbie i played martingale
it was on baccarat....after 3 B or P in a row i bet the other side....
after a bad run i never looked back
you know, at my local casino the organic baccart machine often has B runs of over 12.....I see people cash in big
I am a believer in play as you wish...learn lessons your own way....as long as it is disposable money and will not hurt you, do what you will
if i lose, i will still be going out to dinner friday night
original poster:
how long have you been playing this way?
what is your unit size?
real wheel or airball?
online or brick and morter building?
if you begin at 1 unit bets, and started at 200u, and now have over 1000 units, then I would say you are an incredibly lucky man....luck
(link:s://media4.giphy.com/media/IUjaKjjPPbGaQ/200w.gif)
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 19, 06:40 PM 2016
it was a long time ago, mogul
I did not lose any money i do not believe...... i had a stop loss, but it went south
i have no problem admitting then when i was a newbie i played martingale
it was on baccarat....after 3 B or P in a row i bet the other side....
after a bad run i never looked back
you know, at my local casino the organic baccart machine often has B runs of over 12.....I see people cash in big
I am a believer in play as you wish...learn lessons your own way....as long as it is disposable money and will not hurt you, do what you will
if i lose, i will still be going out to dinner friday night
I understand. But I see a few things.
Your paradigm of play was a "no loss" paradigm. So the "going south" just
meant that it violated that one rule.
Also, it's funny. Not that it has to matter. But I was looking at
roulette with the "doubles" scenario and playing a 5 step marty
for a REPEAT. Opposite of the traditional.
I once watched, real wheel, real play, two women chase a marty.
Black was repeating and they were chasing red. I was all over it.
Routing for them, and watching reality unfold feeling great shock.
But the truth almost seems to be that the scenario always quoted
is the one where the run continues and someone bets against it.
Just pointing out some details.
So just to point out (if it is true). That you let
go of your hope based on one loss.
Not exactly a characteristic expectation.
Quote from: Omarcox on Sep 19, 09:39 AM 2016
Sorry for the type mistake.
The sequence is RBRRBB without stopping, even if Zero comes… Continue with that sequence and double your bet if loss until you win. Even if you win continue with your sequence.
Till now, i reach incredible results.
I know that martingale is very dangerous thats why I'm asking your help to test before they cut my legs.
Now my BR in 1127u (initially was 200u).
On my last session max. exposure has been 31u.
I also tried it with a D'alembert and looks very powerful.
Obviously we need to test more.
Omar
Aside of anything else I said, 1127 units is crazy.
I play at a $5 table. A 5 step labby is only 32 units.
Didn't really let go of hopes
I just ended up knowing better
A marty after a streak of 4 will lose....
Might win for awhile
And i guess if luck is on your side for a long time
Most baccarat players i see win by riding streaks
Quote from: mogul397 on Sep 19, 09:34 PM 2016
Aside of anything else I said, 1127 units is crazy.
I play at a $5 table. A 5 step labby is only 32 units.
I know you fancy zumma
See how long a 6, 7, or even 8 step marty wins betting RBRRBB. Reset to 1 unit on a win
I bet it finds a devestating loss within 4 pages
Hi
I'm not Marty fan, but the sequence which plays RBRRBB is certainly better like chasing sleepers, more action, the probability same.
Stop lose 64 units, 32 units profit target .
Same system as most on this forum.
Haha, yesterday played this strategy for fun, using the minimum bets in WillHill, before the moment I logs in there and they ban my possibility of playing live casino.
Quote from: ozon on Sep 20, 01:50 AM 2016the moment I logs in there and they ban my possibility of playing live casino
That's because:
1. They know live roulette is vulnerable
2. You did something that just might be related to advantage play
William Hill do this to lots of accounts for live roulette. It never happens with RNG, because they dont lose with RNG except when the player gets lucky.
I have more and more problems with online casinos,
I have very good strategy for Rng, but I trust almost only betvoyager, after winning a few% of bankroll, they began to disconnect me .
Playtech casinos is riged to the max.I dont trust them.Dublin bet Disconnect me.
I do not know where I can play.
Be wary of celtic casino
I play with fun money and sometimes it freezes or disconnects
Better off live casino or airball in casino shop....
Even better chose a CLASS III casino if available .
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 19, 09:37 PM 2016
I know you fancy zumma
See how long a 6, 7, or even 8 step marty wins betting RBRRBB. Reset to 1 unit on a win
I bet it finds a devestating loss within 4 pages
Probably true. It's also sadly true that while sifting through pages of actual data I will
grab zumma occasionally as a comparison.
I was going to make this added comment to my other comments.
If you were going to try to figure an unlikely event, you would string
results together, figuring that the longer the string, the less likely.
I honestly don't remember almost any strings of 5 wins in a row. But by
the same rules, strings of 5 losses seem to fall out of the sky. There's something
backwards.
I have been thinking, in various directions, of making an up as you win method.
Not by conventional thinking. But by jumping on the wagon train that spits out
strings of 5 or whatever.
Hes hoping for 1 win by betting that sequence
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 20, 04:27 PM 2016
Hes hoping for 1 win by betting that sequence
I know that. I thought what you were saying was that in a small number
of pages you would find marty losses easily with that pattern.
And I was saying that, while it always seems easy to find 5 or 6 losses
in a row, I NEVER seem to find even 4-5 wins.
Quote from: ozon on Sep 20, 10:02 AM 2016I have very good strategy for Rng
what system you play for RNG? Is it proftiable so far in your long run?
Quote from: ozon on Sep 20, 01:27 AM 2016
Hi
I'm not Marty fan, but the sequence which plays RBRRBB is certainly better like chasing sleepers, more action, the probability same.
Stop lose 64 units, 32 units profit target .
Same system as most on this forum.
The problem or question that I have in using that is this. Are you using it
on a rolling basis? The reason I ask is because whenever I think of
trying something that way, you end up with a win somewhere in the series
and then start off again, giving opportunity to a series match.
In other words, if you play RBRRBB. You may play RBR. Win. And start with
RBRRBB again, and that is an opportunity for that sequence to happen. As opposed
to playing RBRRBB RBRRBB RBRRBB RBRRBB , and if you win somewhere
early you wait til it ends.
I can't figure out if that matters. But other times it seems to.
I just grabbed a paper from today when I went and gathered data. Here is
some of the data.
RRBRBBRR
Using the RBRRBB template here is what happens......
R win
R win
B loss
R loss
B loss
B loss
R loss
R loss
After 2 wins, I got an EXACT series of 6 for a loss...........
(And I didn't even need zumma)
Quote from: mogul397 on Sep 21, 05:38 PM 2016
I just grabbed a paper from today when I went and gathered data. Here is
some of the data.
RRBRBBRR
Using the RBRRBB template here is what happens......
R win
R win
B loss
R loss
B loss
B loss
R loss
R loss
After 2 wins, I got an EXACT series of 6 for a loss...........
(And I didn't even need zumma)
So to reiterate what I was saying before about the pattern of 6 and
how it aligns, If I had applied the pattern " RBRRBB " in the beginning,
and stopped applying it for the rest of the 6 spins and began again, I would
have won and continued. The point being that I "missed" the hitting
the patter, spin for spin, and began a new search.
Does it matter? Will I align with it right after that? Or did I dodge a bullet?
That sequence will inevitably hit whether betting on a rolling basis or restarting after a win. We´ll never know when, so neither strategy is better than the other. What we know is the probability of any 6 step EC sequence to complete is 1/64 (zeros not accounted).
How many chances are there in an EC? Two (Red or Black).
How many steps is the sequence? Six. So it will be 2*2*2*2*2*2=64.
Let´s say you use RBRRBB continuously:
R= 1/2 or One in two chances to win the first bet.
B = 1/(2*2) = 1/4 or One in four chances to win the first and second bets.
R = 1/(2*2*2) = 1/8 or One in 64 chances to win all bets.One in eight chances to win the first, second and third bets.
R = 1/(2*2*2*2) = 1/16
B = 1/(2*2*2*2*2) = 1/32
B = 1/(2*2*2*2*2*2) = 1/64 or One in 64 chances to win all bets.
Notice how the divisors are always doubling up. A clue to how and why the Martingale works (to a certain point).
As your chances of losing keep doubling up, a crazy but fun system would be thinking of any EC sequence and betting against it.