This idea is so new, I checked it a bit, but I thought of it last night.
So I was thinking about betting double dozens. Normally we pick some
data set as our selection. Like betting the last 2 dozen.
My idea is to bet the data set that came out in the last two spins.
Here is a random example.
3
1
1
00
3
1 This number was the "next to last".
2 This number was the "third to last".
3 So we bet here next to last (1), and third to last (3).
And continue that picking pattern every spin. So as the tendency
changes, we move with that change. Try it a bit and offer feedback
about if it's just the same old, same old...
Alan,
I have experimented with many double dozen methods over the last few years, but in the end I always face the inevitable situation of having to use a negative progression to recoup losses.
Flat betting does not work with double dozen methods (at least not consistently) and the usual 1 3 9 27 negative progression is a pure bankroll killer.
I think you will face the same eventuality with this particular bet selection method also. I have not found one single double dozen method that wins consistently with flat betting.
Double Dozens ( 0/00 wheel) one of my favorite winning methods. NO sweat !
If you are foolish enough to back two dozens for the same spin then the bank has an 8% advantage over you.
For if you back one dozen the bank only bets you 2/1 that 25 numbers will beat 12, whereas the proper odds are 2.08/1
And in the same way, if you back two dozens, the bank makes you lay 2/1 that 24 numbers will beat 13, whereas the proper odds are only 1.84/1 and you consequently have a disadvantage of 8% in the odds.
ND says double dozen = no sweat
He gets "excellent contribution" from Mr J
If i said that i would have gotten the finger smite and been told its too many numbers and goofy
Talk about wild swings of opinion.
Know what you're saying RG, but you have +52. Howz that?
I can't bring the two opinions together except that tamino is betting flat and
waiting for the simple swing in his direction for profit. You may get hit for
2 units, but there will be better winning streaks.
I think that chasing the loss is the problem. Can you add to this tamino? Cause
my feeling is that this may be the case, and chasing the loss becomes the problem.
I also feel/wonder that there is something about chasing the immediate loss is the
problem with any negative progression. The problem is that you can and will get
times where there is a string of losses. If you waited for that spell to pass, and recoup
at a better time, or if you adapt your bet selection, then one of those two would be a longer
term solution.
Comments on how you play tamino? What is your start and stop?
Quote from: mogul397 on Sep 27, 09:31 AM 2016
Know what you're saying RG, but you have +52. Howz that?
(link:s://media2.giphy.com/media/mn1cym1jiJOUg/giphy.gif)
RouletteGhost,
I have never ever revealed my method of how I am playing any 2 dozen bet selection. I am not a system churner like some posters with 3-4 Holy Grail per week.
HAPPY WINNINGS !!!
Quote from: Tamino on Sep 27, 11:43 AM 2016
RouletteGhost,
I have never ever revealed my method of how I am playing any 2 dozen bet selection. I am not a system churner like some posters with 3-4 Holy Grail per week.
HAPPY WINNINGS !!!
My post was in regards to the J double standard
It was not meant to agitate you
OK. No further comment.
ND.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 27, 08:19 AM 2016
ND says double dozen = no sweat
He gets "excellent contribution" from Mr J
If i said that i would have gotten the finger smite and been told its too many numbers and goofy
Rich,
You have always been one of the smite board leaders -- how in the world did you end up with +52 ?
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Sep 27, 01:45 PM 2016
Rich,
You have always been one of the smite board leaders -- how in the world did you end up with +52 ?
Caleb was the one who smited me so much. He cant anymore
What happened to The General?
Turner really banned him?
He isnt banned
He just has a problem with authority and he dislikes turner
So he is being a grown man baby
Drsudoku out of curiousity how do you know my name?
I am not expevting you to answer. But figured I'd try
Oh stupid me. It was my old usernmane. Lol
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Sep 27, 01:53 PM 2016Turner really banned him?
lol....Im like the bogey man. An urban myth. Turner will get you in the night lol
I didnt ban Caleb. I didnt put him on moderated.
Quote from: Tamino on Sep 27, 11:43 AM 2016
RouletteGhost,
I have never ever revealed my method of how I am playing any 2 dozen bet selection. I am not a system churner like some posters with 3-4 Holy Grail per week.
HAPPY WINNINGS !!!
Well for one, no one has 3-4 holy grails A YEAR!!!!.
But aside from that I suggest that the moderator ban comments from people
about "winning methods" that they refuse to discuss. It's not system churning.
It's discussion. Or disclosure, if you like.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 27, 03:11 PM 2016
Oh stupid me. It was my old usernmane. Lol
Yes, richbailey86 -- I have seen it in so many different forums.
Quote from: Turner on Sep 27, 03:29 PM 2016
lol....Im like the bogey man. An urban myth. Turner will get you in the night lol
I didnt ban Caleb. I didnt put him on moderated.
Turner,
If it were not for you and Iggiv coming here and checking things everyday, this place would be much more uncivilized than what it is right now. So both of you should get some credit for keeping things under control and tolerable.
Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Sep 27, 07:43 PM 2016
Turner,
If it were not for you and Iggiv coming here and checking things everyday, this place would be much more uncivilized than what it is right now. So both of you should get some credit for keeping things under control and tolerable.
Agreed